Computer-Assisted Navigation for Intramedullary Nail Fixation of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures

NCT ID: NCT02190435

Last Updated: 2017-05-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

65 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-07-31

Study Completion Date

2016-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There are approximately 250,000 hip fractures in the US every year, and intertrochanteric (IT) fractures (fractures that occur just below the femoral head) account for nearly half of these fractures. The use of intramedullary (IM) nails for fixation of IT femur fractures has become a well-accepted and increasingly more common procedure among orthopaedic traumatologists, and is standard of care at our institution.

While advancements in intramedullary nail fixation have made it a relatively efficient procedure, the placement of the lag screw into the femoral head still remains a challenging step in the procedure. Inaccurate placement can lead to screw cut-out, one of the most commonly reported complications with IM nail fixation. Previous work has shown that the lag screw position is an important factor in reducing screw cut-out. This step of the procedure can be time demanding and often requires several intraoperative radiographs for accurate placement. Recently developed computer-assisted navigation systems provide surgeons with the ability to track screw placement in real-time. This could allow for improved screw placement and potentially reduce radiation exposure to the patient and surgeon. To date, the potential advantages of computer-assisted navigation have not been examined.

The primary objective of this study is to examine whether the use of Stryker's ADAPT computer-assisted navigation for Gamma nail fixation can result in improved lag screw placement. The secondary objective is to examine whether the use of the ADAPT for Gamma nail fixation can reduce intraoperative radiation exposure.Our hypothesis is that there is a difference in the lag screw placement (i.e. tip to apex distance measurement) between procedures using the ADAPT system versus the conventional technique for Gamma nail fixation. Additionally, we hypothesize that there is a difference in radiation exposure (i.e. fluoroscopy time) between procedures using the ADAPT system versus the conventional technique for Gamma nail fixation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ADAPT

Patients that receive intramedullary nail fixation with use of the Stryker ADAPT computer-assisted navigation system

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Stryker ADAPT computer-assisted navigation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Adaptive Positioning Technology for Gamma 3

Control

Patients that receive conventional technique intramedullary nail fixation without use of the Stryker ADAPT computer-assisted navigation system

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional technique

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional Technique

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stryker ADAPT computer-assisted navigation

Adaptive Positioning Technology for Gamma 3

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional technique

Conventional Technique

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing hip fracture fixation with a Gamma Nail by one of four orthopaedic trauma surgeons at William Beaumont Hospital Royal Oak
* Diagnosis of an intertrochanteric femur fracture (AO Classification 31-A1,A2)
* Low energy mechanism of injury (i.e. fall, twist)

Exclusion Criteria

* Minors (less than 18 years)
* Pregnant
* Have a high energy mechanism of injury (e.g. motor vehicle accident, fall from height)
* Have an open fracture (i.e. the skin is broken at the fracture site), or
* Present with multiple injuries to the ipsilateral lower extremity
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stryker Orthopaedics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

William Beaumont Hospitals

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kevin Grant, MD

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kevin Grant, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

William Beaumont Hospitals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

William Beaumont Hospital

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Jul;77(7):1058-64. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199507000-00012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7608228 (View on PubMed)

Lobo-Escolar A, Joven E, Iglesias D, Herrera A. Predictive factors for cutting-out in femoral intramedullary nailing. Injury. 2010 Dec;41(12):1312-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.009. Epub 2010 Sep 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20832795 (View on PubMed)

Geller JA, Saifi C, Morrison TA, Macaulay W. Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures. Int Orthop. 2010 Jun;34(5):719-22. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0837-7. Epub 2009 Jul 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19618186 (View on PubMed)

De Bruijn K, den Hartog D, Tuinebreijer W, Roukema G. Reliability of predictors for screw cutout in intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 18;94(14):1266-72. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00357.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22810396 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014-111

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.