Computer-Assisted Navigation for Intramedullary Nail Fixation of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures
NCT ID: NCT02190435
Last Updated: 2017-05-24
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
65 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-07-31
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
While advancements in intramedullary nail fixation have made it a relatively efficient procedure, the placement of the lag screw into the femoral head still remains a challenging step in the procedure. Inaccurate placement can lead to screw cut-out, one of the most commonly reported complications with IM nail fixation. Previous work has shown that the lag screw position is an important factor in reducing screw cut-out. This step of the procedure can be time demanding and often requires several intraoperative radiographs for accurate placement. Recently developed computer-assisted navigation systems provide surgeons with the ability to track screw placement in real-time. This could allow for improved screw placement and potentially reduce radiation exposure to the patient and surgeon. To date, the potential advantages of computer-assisted navigation have not been examined.
The primary objective of this study is to examine whether the use of Stryker's ADAPT computer-assisted navigation for Gamma nail fixation can result in improved lag screw placement. The secondary objective is to examine whether the use of the ADAPT for Gamma nail fixation can reduce intraoperative radiation exposure.Our hypothesis is that there is a difference in the lag screw placement (i.e. tip to apex distance measurement) between procedures using the ADAPT system versus the conventional technique for Gamma nail fixation. Additionally, we hypothesize that there is a difference in radiation exposure (i.e. fluoroscopy time) between procedures using the ADAPT system versus the conventional technique for Gamma nail fixation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Randomized Comparison of 2 Fixation Techniques for Unstable Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures
NCT00597779
Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture Fixation Trial
NCT02627040
Helical Blade vs Lag Screw Fixation for Cephalomedullary Nailing of Low Energy Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures
NCT04306198
Comparison of Sliding Hip Screw to Intra Medullary Nailing in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture
NCT03906032
InterTAN IM Nail Versus Sliding Hip Screw in Geriatric Fractures
NCT00664950
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ADAPT
Patients that receive intramedullary nail fixation with use of the Stryker ADAPT computer-assisted navigation system
Stryker ADAPT computer-assisted navigation
Adaptive Positioning Technology for Gamma 3
Control
Patients that receive conventional technique intramedullary nail fixation without use of the Stryker ADAPT computer-assisted navigation system
Conventional technique
Conventional Technique
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Stryker ADAPT computer-assisted navigation
Adaptive Positioning Technology for Gamma 3
Conventional technique
Conventional Technique
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of an intertrochanteric femur fracture (AO Classification 31-A1,A2)
* Low energy mechanism of injury (i.e. fall, twist)
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant
* Have a high energy mechanism of injury (e.g. motor vehicle accident, fall from height)
* Have an open fracture (i.e. the skin is broken at the fracture site), or
* Present with multiple injuries to the ipsilateral lower extremity
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Stryker Orthopaedics
INDUSTRY
William Beaumont Hospitals
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kevin Grant, MD
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kevin Grant, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
William Beaumont Hospitals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Jul;77(7):1058-64. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199507000-00012.
Lobo-Escolar A, Joven E, Iglesias D, Herrera A. Predictive factors for cutting-out in femoral intramedullary nailing. Injury. 2010 Dec;41(12):1312-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.009. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
Geller JA, Saifi C, Morrison TA, Macaulay W. Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures. Int Orthop. 2010 Jun;34(5):719-22. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0837-7. Epub 2009 Jul 18.
De Bruijn K, den Hartog D, Tuinebreijer W, Roukema G. Reliability of predictors for screw cutout in intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 18;94(14):1266-72. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00357.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014-111
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.