HR Versus RFA for Early Stage HCC

NCT ID: NCT02169765

Last Updated: 2020-07-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-08-01

Study Completion Date

2022-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading death cancer in the world. It is important to explore a safe and effective therapy for early-stage HCC. Previous studies reported that radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has higher efficacy and is associated with fewer complications and shorter hospital stays than hepatic resection (HR) for early-stage HCC. However, meta-analysis and systematic review found that RFA is associated with higher recurrence rate and lower long-term overall survival.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Liver Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hepatic resection

Indications for HR were the presence of appropriate residual liver volume determined by volumetric computed tomography and lack of hepatic encephalopathy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hepatic resection

Intervention Type OTHER

Adequate remnant liver volume was 30% for HCC patients without cirrhosis, and \>50% for HCC patients with chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, or severe fatty liver.

Radiofrequency ablation

Radiofrequency ablation is performed in less than one week after clinical diagnosis.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Radiofrequency ablation

Intervention Type OTHER

Radiofrequency ablation is performed in less than one week after clinical diagnosis.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hepatic resection

Adequate remnant liver volume was 30% for HCC patients without cirrhosis, and \>50% for HCC patients with chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, or severe fatty liver.

Intervention Type OTHER

Radiofrequency ablation

Radiofrequency ablation is performed in less than one week after clinical diagnosis.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18-75 years
* Clinical diagnosis of HCC was confirmed by histopathological examination of surgical samples in all patients
* Tumor stage fitted into Milan Criteria
* Patients have Child-Pugh A liver function
* No previous neoadjuvant treatment
* No evidence of metastasis to the lymph nodes and/or distant metastases on the basis of preoperative imaging results and perioperative findings
* No malignancy other than HCC for 5 years prior to the initial HCC treatment
* No history of encephalopathy, ascites refractory to diuretics or variceal bleeding

Exclusion Criteria

* History of cardiac disease:

* Congestive heart failure \> New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2; active coronary artery disease (myocardial infarction more than 6 months prior to study entry is permitted);
* Cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy other than beta blockers, calcium channel blocker or digoxin; or
* Uncontrolled hypertension (failure of diastolic blood pressure to fall below 90 mmHg, despite the use of 3 antihypertensive drugs).
* Active clinically serious infections ( \> grade 2 National Cancer Institute \[NCI\]-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0)
* Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
* Known Central Nervous System tumors including metastatic brain disease
* Patients with clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry
* History of organ allograft
* Substance abuse, medical, psychological or social conditions that may interfere with the patient's participation in the study or evaluation of the study results
* Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agent or any agent given in association with this trial
* Any condition that is unstable or which could jeopardize the safety of the patient and his/her compliance in the study
* Pregnant or breast-feeding patients. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test performed within seven days prior to the start of study drug. Both men and women enrolled in this trial must use adequate barrier birth control measures during the course of the trial.
* Excluded therapies and medications, previous and concomitant:

* Autologous bone marrow transplant or stem cell rescue within four months of start of study drug
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Guangxi Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jian-Hong Zhong

Affiliated Tumor Hospital

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Hepatobilliary Surgery, Affiliated Tumor of Guangxi University

Nanning, Guangxi, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jian-Hong Zhong, MD

Role: CONTACT

86-771-5330855

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jian-Hong Zhong, MD

Role: primary

86-771-5330855

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cho YK, Rhim H, Noh S. Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection as primary treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma meeting the Milan criteria: a systematic review. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Sep;26(9):1354-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06812.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21679247 (View on PubMed)

Cucchetti A, Piscaglia F, Cescon M, Colecchia A, Ercolani G, Bolondi L, Pinna AD. Cost-effectiveness of hepatic resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for early hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2013 Aug;59(2):300-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23603669 (View on PubMed)

Duan C, Liu M, Zhang Z, Ma K, Bie P. Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for the treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma meeting Milan criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug 13;11(1):190. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-190.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23941614 (View on PubMed)

Wang Y, Luo Q, Li Y, Deng S, Wei S, Li X. Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinomas: a meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 3;9(1):e84484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084484. eCollection 2014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24404166 (View on PubMed)

Cho YK, Kim JK, Kim WT, Chung JW. Hepatic resection versus radiofrequency ablation for very early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a Markov model analysis. Hepatology. 2010 Apr;51(4):1284-90. doi: 10.1002/hep.23466.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20099299 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HRRFA-HCC

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

HRRFA-HCC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

RFA Versus SBRT for Recurrent Small HCC
NCT04047173 COMPLETED PHASE3