RFA+Highly-purified CTL vs. RFA Alone for Recurrent HCC

NCT ID: NCT02678013

Last Updated: 2016-02-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

210 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-29

Study Completion Date

2022-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Recurrence of tumor within the liver remnant is common, with a reported 5-year recurrence rate of 70%. Repeat hepatectomy is an effective treatment for intrahepatic HCC but with a small proportion of resection rate because of the poor functional liver reserve and postoperative complications. Radiofrequency ablation(RFA) is becoming the main effective treatment for small HCC (≤5.0cm). The efficacy of RFA for recurrent HCC has been reported to be comparable to those achieved by surgery with minimal, but higher local recurrence rate after RFA. It has been reported that immunotherapy in patients who underwent curative treatment for HCC, adjuvant immunotherapy with activated CIK cells increased recurrence-free and overall survival. But there is little evidence for adjuvant immunotherapy of recurrence HCC. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes(CTL), a kind of effective T cells that specific recognizing and killing antigen targeted cells through cloning amplification after receiving antigen information from antigen presented cell and playing key role to clear cancerous cells. So our hypothesis is that RFA combined with immunotherapy (Highly-purified CTL) is superior to RFA for recurrent HCC. The aim of this prospective study is to compare the outcome of RFA combined with immunotherapy (Highly-purified CTL) with RFA for small recurrent HCC after partial hepatectomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Radiofrequency ablation(RFA)

RFA was performed according to the Guidelines of Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy for Liver Cancer: Chinese Expert Consensus Statement issued by the Chinese Society of Liver Cancer and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology RFA was performed under real-time ultrasound guidance. RFA was performed by using a commercially available Cool-tipTM RFA system (Valleylab, Boulder, CO, USA), or a RF 2000 system (Radio-Therapeutics Mountain View, CA). Grounding was achieved by attaching 2 pads to the patient's back or legs.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

RFA

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Radiofrequency ablation(RFA)for small recurrent HCC

RFA+CTL

RFA was performed the same as RFA Arm.Peripheral blood (20-30mL) for manufacturing the individualized highly-purified CTL agent was collected from the respective patients who were randomized to the immunotherapy group before starting treatment. The highly-purified CTL agent was prepared at a central manufacturing facility. Patients in the immunotherapy group received 5\*10E9 of the highly-purified CTL agent intravenously over 60 minutes without any premedication and then were observed for at least 30 minutes. They were scheduled to receive highly-purified CTL: 4-6 treatments at a frequency of once two-week during 6 months after receiving RFA, followed by 6-9 treatments during 6 months to 2 years after receiving RFA.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

RFA+highly-purified CTL

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Radiofrequency ablation(RFA) plus highly-purified CTL for small recurrent HCC

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

RFA

Radiofrequency ablation(RFA)for small recurrent HCC

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

RFA+highly-purified CTL

Radiofrequency ablation(RFA) plus highly-purified CTL for small recurrent HCC

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. age 18-75 years;
2. recurrence of HCC 12 months after initial hepatectomy;
3. no other treatment received except for the initial hepatectomy;
4. single tumor≤5.0cm in diameter; or 2-3 lesions each≤3.0cm;
5. lesions visible on ultrasound and with an acceptable and safe path between the lesion and the skin as shown on ultrasound;
6. no severe coagulation disorders (prothrombin activity\<40% or a platelet count\<40,000/mm3);
7. Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group performance(ECOG) status 0-1.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Pregnant women, breastfeeding women or plan pregnancy for the future 2 years;
2. The presence of vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread onimaging;
3. Usage of strong immunosuppressive agents such as corticosteroids, cyclosporine A within six months or longer;
4. HIV antibody or HCV antibody positive;
5. Immunodeficiency diseases or autoimmune diseases (such as rheumatoid arthritis, Buerger's disease, multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes);
6. Suffering with cancers (except skin cancer, prostate cancer or cervical carcinoma in situ) at the enrolling time or 5 years before;
7. Suffering with other organ failure;
8. Suffering with severe mental illness;
9. Drug addiction (including alcohol) for 1 year before the enrolling time;
10. Participate in other Clinical trials within three months prior to 3 months before the enrolling time;
11. Other researchers believe that the patient is not fit for inclusion.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ming Kuang

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ming Kuang

Ph.D.,M.D.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ming Kuang, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Zhen-Wei Peng

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bruix J, Sherman M; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology. 2011 Mar;53(3):1020-2. doi: 10.1002/hep.24199. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21374666 (View on PubMed)

Lee JH, Lee Y, Lee M, Heo MK, Song JS, Kim KH, Lee H, Yi NJ, Lee KW, Suh KS, Bae YS, Kim YJ. A phase I/IIa study of adjuvant immunotherapy with tumour antigen-pulsed dendritic cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2015 Dec 22;113(12):1666-76. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.430. Epub 2015 Dec 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26657650 (View on PubMed)

Harding JJ, El Dika I, Abou-Alfa GK. Immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: Primed to make a difference? Cancer. 2016 Feb 1;122(3):367-77. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29769. Epub 2015 Nov 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26540029 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HCC 004

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.