TACE+RFA Versus TACE Alone for Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma

NCT ID: NCT02435953

Last Updated: 2025-12-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

242 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-28

Study Completion Date

2025-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The current standard treatment for intermediate-stage HCC (BCLC stage B) is transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone. The combination of TACE with RFA has also reported to be an effective treatment for HCC. Some prospective studies have shown that TACE combined with RFA have better efficacy than any of them alone for early stage HCC (single tumor ≤5 cm). However, to the investigators' knowledge, there have not been any prospective studies to assess whether TACE combined sequentially with RFA is more effective than TACE alone for the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC. The investigators hypothesized that the combination of TACE and RFA might result in better patient survival than TACE alone. Thus, the purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the effects of sequential TACE-RFA with TACE alone for the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC. Intermediate-stage HCC in this study was defined as 2-3 intrahepatic lessions, largest tumor size 3-7 cm or 4-10 intrahepatic lessions, largest tumor size ≤7 cm; ECOG-PS 0; Child-pugh A or B7; no tumor thrombus or extrahepatic metastases.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Chemoembolization, Therapeutic Ablation Techniques, RFA

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma,TACE,Chemoembolization, RFA,Intermediate-stage

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TACE-RFA

RFA follows TACE when achieving ablation eligibility criteria defined in this study, with no more than four sessions of TACE.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TACE

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A catheter (or a microcatheter for cases where small vessels and branches cannot be accessed with a standard angiographic catheter) will be advanced selectively or superselectively into the right or left hepatic artery or the feeding arteries directly supplying the tumor. Depending on tumor size, location, blood supply, and liver function, the interventional radiologist administers a cytotoxic agent and lipiodol emulsion (30 mg lobaplatin, 30 mg pirarubicin, and \< 15 mL lipiodol) through the catheter. Following drug infusion, embolization of the tumor vessels will be routinely performed using gelatin sponge particles.

RFA

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Commercial electrode systems are used and the ablation therapy is to be performed according to manufacturer's standard recommendations. All lesions are targeted with CT images during the RFA procedure.

TACE alone

On-demand TACE.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TACE

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A catheter (or a microcatheter for cases where small vessels and branches cannot be accessed with a standard angiographic catheter) will be advanced selectively or superselectively into the right or left hepatic artery or the feeding arteries directly supplying the tumor. Depending on tumor size, location, blood supply, and liver function, the interventional radiologist administers a cytotoxic agent and lipiodol emulsion (30 mg lobaplatin, 30 mg pirarubicin, and \< 15 mL lipiodol) through the catheter. Following drug infusion, embolization of the tumor vessels will be routinely performed using gelatin sponge particles.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TACE

A catheter (or a microcatheter for cases where small vessels and branches cannot be accessed with a standard angiographic catheter) will be advanced selectively or superselectively into the right or left hepatic artery or the feeding arteries directly supplying the tumor. Depending on tumor size, location, blood supply, and liver function, the interventional radiologist administers a cytotoxic agent and lipiodol emulsion (30 mg lobaplatin, 30 mg pirarubicin, and \< 15 mL lipiodol) through the catheter. Following drug infusion, embolization of the tumor vessels will be routinely performed using gelatin sponge particles.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

RFA

Commercial electrode systems are used and the ablation therapy is to be performed according to manufacturer's standard recommendations. All lesions are targeted with CT images during the RFA procedure.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Multiple HCC (2-3 lesions), largest lesion 3-7 cm in diameter, or multiple HCC (4-10 lesions), each ≤ 7 cm in diameter
* No vascular invasion or etrahepatic metastases
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0
* Child-Pugh Stage A or B7
* Screening laboratory values must meet the following criteria and should be obtained within 14 days prior to procedure:

I.Adequate hematologic function:

1. WBC ≥ 4.0 x 109/L (stable, off any growth factor within 4 weeks of study drug administration)
2. Neutrophils ≥ 1.5 x 109/L (stable, off any growth factor within 4 weeks of study drug administration)
3. Platelets ≥ 60 x 109/L (transfusion to achieve this level is not permitted)
4. Hemoglobin ≥ 100 g/L (may be transfused to meet this requirement)

II.Adequate hepatic function:

1. Serum Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) ≤ 5×ULN
2. Serum Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 5×ULN
3. Serum total bilirubin ≤ 51.3 μmol/L
4. Serum albumin ≥ 2.8 g/dL

III.Adequate coagulation function:

a)prothrombin activity ≥ 40%

IV.Adequate renal function:

a)Serum creatinine \< 110 μmol/L

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous local therapy completed less than 4 weeks prior to the dosing and, if present any related acute toxicity \> grade 1
* Any contraindications for TACE/RFA procedure:

I.Impaired clotting test (platelet count \< 60000/mm3, prothrombin activity \< 40%) II.Renal failure / insufficiency requiring hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. III.Known severe atheromatosis IV.Known uncontrolled blood hypertension (\> 160/100 mmHg) V.Patients with known active bleeding (e.g. from GI ulcers, esophageal varices) within 2 months prior to baseline/screening visit or with history or evidence of inherited bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy VI.Clinically significant third space fluid accumulation (i.e., ascites requiring tapping despite use of diuretic or pleural effusion that either required tapping or is associated with shortness of breath)

* Evidence of hepatic discompensation (i.e., refractory ascites, esophageal or gastric variceal bleeding, or hepatic encephalophathy)
* Patients with any other malignancies within the last 3 years before study start
* History of HCC tumor rupture
* Clinically significant (CTC grade 3 or 4) venous or arterial thrombotic disease within past 6 months
* History of abdominal fistula, GI perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess within past 6 months prior to study treatment
* Pregnant women or lactating women
* Be allergic to pirarubicin, lobaplatin and iodized oil
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ming Zhao

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ming Zhao

Sun Yat-sen University

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ming Zhao, doctor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigator, Clinical Professor

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Medical Imaging Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center,

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014-FXY-089

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id