Comparison Between Radiofrequency Ablation and Hypofractionated Proton Beam Radiation for Recurrent/Residual HCC

NCT ID: NCT01963429

Last Updated: 2020-10-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

144 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-30

Study Completion Date

2020-01-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This phase 3 study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the comparison between radiofrequency ablation and hypofractionated proton beam radiation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The sample size for this study was based on a non-inferiority design. Primary objective: estimate local progression-free survival (LPFS) rate in two treatments Primary endpoint: 2-year LPFS rate Expected 2-year LPFS rate in the RFA: 85% Accural time and follow up time: 24 months and 24 months, respectively. Precision for 2-year LPFS rate estimation: Allowing a difference of 15% as the non-inferiority margin, with a power of 80% and a type I error level of 5%, evaluable 68 patients are required.

Considering 5% of follow-up loss, we need 72 patients in each arm, so a total of 144 patients will be enrolled.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Recurrent Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Residual Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A(radiofrequency ablation )

radiofrequency ablation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

radiofrequency ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

\* RFA(radiofrequency ablation )

* RFA electrode: Cool-tip RF ablation system (Covidien plc, 20 Lower Hatch Street Dublin 2, Ireland) and Well-Point RF Electrode (STARmed, Koea)
* performed using either the manufacturer's standard algorithm or an interactive algorithm, with the latter being used when the impedance did not begin to increase at the midinterval of the standard algorithm
* the duration of a single RFA session was 10 min to 15 min.

B(Proton)

hypofractionated proton beam therapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Proton beam therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

\* Proton

66 GyE /10 fx, 6.6 GyE fraction dose, 5 days/week, for HCC free from the alimentary tract (i.e., stomach, duodenum, esophagus, small and large bowel) (more than 2cm from clinical target volume),TLV30\<40%,and/orRLV30\<30%)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

radiofrequency ablation

\* RFA(radiofrequency ablation )

* RFA electrode: Cool-tip RF ablation system (Covidien plc, 20 Lower Hatch Street Dublin 2, Ireland) and Well-Point RF Electrode (STARmed, Koea)
* performed using either the manufacturer's standard algorithm or an interactive algorithm, with the latter being used when the impedance did not begin to increase at the midinterval of the standard algorithm
* the duration of a single RFA session was 10 min to 15 min.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Proton beam therapy

\* Proton

66 GyE /10 fx, 6.6 GyE fraction dose, 5 days/week, for HCC free from the alimentary tract (i.e., stomach, duodenum, esophagus, small and large bowel) (more than 2cm from clinical target volume),TLV30\<40%,and/orRLV30\<30%)

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* HCC diagnosed as (i) the presence of risk factors including hepatitis B or C virus and liver cirrhosis, a serum a-fetoprotein (AFP) level greater than 200 IU/ml and a radiologically compatible feature with HCC in one or more CT/MRI/angiograms, or (ii) the presence of risk factors including hepatitis B or C virus and liver cirrhosis, a serum a-fetoprotein (AFP) level less than 200 IU/ml, and a radiologically compatible feature with HCC in two or more CT/MRI/angiograms or (iii) histological confirmation
* HCC patients who had recurrent or residual tumor after other treatments
* without evidence of extrahepatic metastasis
* the largest diameter of tumor should be less than 3cm, and the number of tumor ≤2
* no previous treatment to target tumors by other forms of RT
* liver function of Child-Pugh class A or B7 (Child-Pugh score of ≤7)
* Age of ≥18 years
* performance status of 0 to 2 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score
* WBC count ≥ 2,000/mm3; hemoglobin level ≥ 7.5 g/dL; platelet count ≥ 50,000/mm3; and adequate hepatic function (total bilirubin ≤ 3.0 mg/dL; AST and ALT \< 5.0× upper limit of normal; no ascites)
* no serious comorbidities other than liver cirrhosis
* written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* evidence of extrahepatic metastasis
* age \< 18 years
* liver function of Child-Pugh class B8-9 and C (Child-Pugh score of \>7) or uncontrolled cases of active chronic hepatitis B
* previous history of other forms of RT adjacent to target tumors
* poor performance status of 3 to 4 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score
* pregnant or breast feeding status
* previous history uncontrolled other malignancies within 2 years
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Center, Korea

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Joong-Won Park

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joong Won Park, Ph.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Cancer Center, Korea

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Cancer Center, Korea

Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kim TH, Koh YH, Kim BH, Kim MJ, Lee JH, Park B, Park JW. Proton beam radiotherapy vs. radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized phase III trial. J Hepatol. 2021 Mar;74(3):603-612. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.09.026. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33031846 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCCCTS 13-695

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

HR Versus RFA for Early Stage HCC
NCT02169765 UNKNOWN PHASE3
RFA Versus SBRT for Recurrent Small HCC
NCT04047173 COMPLETED PHASE3