Boiled Peanut Oral Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Peanut Allergy: a Pilot Study
NCT ID: NCT02149719
Last Updated: 2024-03-29
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
47 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-05-31
2022-05-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Pilot data suggests that boiled peanut is less immunogenic than roasted peanut, and may therefore provide a safer way of inducing desensitisation in patients who are allergic to roasted peanut, by first inducing tolerance to boiled peanut.
Study hypothesis: Increasing doses of boiled peanut can induce desensitisation to roasted peanut, in peanut-allergic individuals.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Boiled Peanut Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Peanut Allergy
NCT03937726
The Peanut Oral Immunotherapy Study: Safety, Efficacy and Discovery
NCT02103270
Peanut Oral Immunotherapy in Children With Peanut Allergy (Peanut Flour)
NCT02203799
Study of Tolerance to Oral Peanut
NCT01259804
Tolerance Following Peanut Oral Immunotherapy
NCT01750879
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Desensitisation to peanut
Desensitisation using boiled peanut
Desensitisation using boiled peanut
Control
Subjects allocated to the control group will undergo routine care for 12 months, following which they will be offered the active treatment with boiled peanut (as a one-way cross-over intervention).
Desensitisation using boiled peanut (deferred start)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Desensitisation using boiled peanut
Desensitisation using boiled peanut (deferred start)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Tolerant to at least 1/4 boiled peanut (boiled for 4 hours) at open food challenge.
* Informed consent of parent/legal guardian and patient assent
Exclusion Criteria
* Tolerates ≥1.4 g roasted peanut protein at entry PCFC
* Unstable asthma
* Unwilling or unable to fulfil study requirements
* Undergoing other forms of immunotherapy (e.g. SCIT or SLIT to aeroallergens)
* Previous admission to ICU for management of allergic reaction to peanut
* Clinically significant chronic illness (other than asthma, rhinitis or eczema).
* Undergoing subcutaneous or sublingual immunotherapy and within the first year of therapy, for respiratory allergy.
* Subjects receiving anti-IgE therapy, oral immunosupressants, beta-blocker or ACE inhibitor therapy.
8 Years
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Sydney
OTHER
National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
OTHER_GOV
Imperial College London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Paul Turner
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dianne E Campbell, FRACP PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Australia
Sam Mehr, FRACP
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Australia
Paul J Turner, FRACP PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Imperial College London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Imperial College London / Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Turner PJ, Ruiz-Garcia M, Patel N, Abrantes G, Burrell S, Vazquez-Ortiz M, Skypala I, Durham SR, Boyle RJ. Delayed symptoms and orthostatic intolerance following peanut challenge. Clin Exp Allergy. 2021 May;51(5):696-702. doi: 10.1111/cea.13865. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
Burrell S, Patel N, Vazquez-Ortiz M, Campbell DE, DunnGalvin A, Turner PJ. Self-administration of adrenaline for anaphylaxis during in-hospital food challenges improves health-related quality of life. Arch Dis Child. 2021 Jun;106(6):558-563. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319906. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ACTRN12614000265673
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
15SM2492
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.