Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-10-31
2015-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
For industry to provide more accurate and helpful labeling, certain characteristics of the food-allergic population need to be defined. Firstly, the minimum 'eliciting dose' for the population has been estimated by studying large groups of peanut allergic patients who are challenged with peanut ingestion in increasing amounts. From these, an eliciting dose that provokes a reaction in 10% of the food-allergic population has been estimated at between six and 14mg of peanut protein.
Translation of population eliciting doses (ED) into acceptable levels of allergen contamination for the population requires consideration of a 'safety factor'- to account for individual variability in dose threshold and severity. Data suggest such variability depends in part on extrinsic factors (exercise and sleep restriction). Each factor may have a different effect in scale and direction. The investigators are proposing a cross-over trial with 85 peanut-allergic adults who will each undergoing a baseline peanut challenge followed by repeat challenges with extrinsic factors applied, in random order (repeat baseline, +exercise and +sleep restriction). These data will further define ED for the UK population and a safety factor derived from shift in threshold, to inform industry and protect the allergic population.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Early Peanut Introduction: Translation to Clinical Practice
NCT03019328
Boiled Peanut Oral Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Peanut Allergy: a Pilot Study
NCT02149719
Relevance of Sensitization to Legumes in Children Allergic to Peanut
NCT04329078
Mechanisms Underlying Peanut Allergic Reactions in TRACE Peanut Study Participants: Extension Study
NCT02665793
Study of Tolerance to Oral Peanut
NCT01259804
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All participants who have a clinical reaction during the initial baseline DBPCFC will be randomized to one of 6 balanced cross over intervention sequences from a Latin square design. Each group rotates through three further challenges in a different order: control (no extrinsic factor), exercise and sleep restriction.
1. Control challenge
Subjects must not have had any accidental reaction to peanut in the previous three months. This challenge will be performed when asthma is well controlled (validated by spirometry normal values), the subjects are rested (sleep diary for preceding week will be examined) and there is no viral illness (clinical history and examination). A peanut challenge will be performed (identically to the initial baseline DBPCFC). Dose threshold and severity score for challenge outcome will be recorded.
2. Exercise challenge Subjects undergo a repeat challenge to peanut with exercise as an extrinsic factor, a minimum of three months after the previous challenge. Subjects must not have had any accidental reaction to peanut in the previous three months. This challenge will be performed when asthma is well controlled (validated by spirometry normal values for the individual and clinical history), the subjects are rested, and there is no viral illness.
The challenge will be double blind and placebo controlled. The challenge will take place on two occasions, on one day all four doses will contain placebo only, on the second all four doses will be active (peanut). The subjects will undergo an identical exercise protocol on both days.
On each day the challenge will begin with 15 minutes of exercise using a standardised protocol. Following this the first challenge dose is given. This is followed by 20 minutes of rest (and observation) before a further exercise period followed by ingestion of the second dose and so on.
The active doses will be…
1. 1/100th of the threshold identified at the initial baseline challenge
2. 1/10th of the threshold identified at the initial baseline challenge
3. The threshold dose identified at the control challenge
4. One dose increment higher than the dose identified at the control challenge.
Subjective and objective dose thresholds and severity score for challenge outcome will be recorded.
If there is no reaction to any dose on the active day then the active arm will be repeated on a separate day, starting at the lowest available challenge dose (3 micrograms). Dose increments up to at least 1/100th of the threshold identified at the control challenge will follow.
3\. Sleep restriction
Participants will undergo a repeat double blind placebo controlled challenge to peanut including sleep restriction as an extrinsic factor, a minimum of three months from the last challenge. Subjects must not have had any accidental reaction to peanut in the previous three months. This challenge will be performed when asthma is well controlled (validated by spirometry normal values), and there is no viral illness (clinical history and examination).
Subjects will be admitted to the research ward on the evening prior to the challenge. Overnight, sleep will be restricted to 3 hours (2300-0200). Subjects will undergo a peanut challenge, using the same dosing range and intervals as the initial baseline challenge.
Subjective and objective dose thresholds and severity score for challenge outcome will be recorded on central online data store. The challenge will take place on two occasions, on one day all doses will contain placebo only, on the second all doses will be active (peanut). The subjects will undergo an identical sleep restriction protocol on each day.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1
Exercise followed by sleep restriction followed by control challenge
Food challenge
Double blind placebo controlled peanut challenge. Each challenge given with or without extrinsic factors exercise or sleep restriction.
Arm 2
Sleep restriction followed by exercise followed by control challenge
Food challenge
Double blind placebo controlled peanut challenge. Each challenge given with or without extrinsic factors exercise or sleep restriction.
Arm 3
control followed by sleep restriction followed by exercise
Food challenge
Double blind placebo controlled peanut challenge. Each challenge given with or without extrinsic factors exercise or sleep restriction.
Arm 4
control followed by exercise followed by sleep restriction
Food challenge
Double blind placebo controlled peanut challenge. Each challenge given with or without extrinsic factors exercise or sleep restriction.
Arm 5
Sleep Restriction followed by control followed by exercise
Food challenge
Double blind placebo controlled peanut challenge. Each challenge given with or without extrinsic factors exercise or sleep restriction.
Arm 6
Exercise followed by control followed by sleep restriction
Food challenge
Double blind placebo controlled peanut challenge. Each challenge given with or without extrinsic factors exercise or sleep restriction.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Food challenge
Double blind placebo controlled peanut challenge. Each challenge given with or without extrinsic factors exercise or sleep restriction.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male and female subject who are 18-45 years of age at the time of study entry (Visit 1) who have a diagnosis of acute peanut allergy as manifested by urticaria, angioedema or respiratory/gastrointestinal tract symptoms, with acute onset of symptoms after ingestion (up to 2h).
* A positive peanut DBPCFC at baseline (Visit 1). This outcome is defined as the onset of objective allergic events after ingestion of peanut protein but not to the placebo. Eligibility to the DBPCFC requires fulfillment of all other eligibility criteria at visit 1.
* Subjects must be able to comply with the study procedures.
18 Years
45 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Imperial College London
OTHER
University of Manchester
OTHER
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Andrew Clark
Associate Lecturer and Consultant in Paediatric Allergy
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Andrew T Clark, MB BS MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, Cambs, United Kingdom
Imperial College
London, London, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Robert Boyle, MB BS PhD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Avery NJ, King RM, Knight S, Hourihane JO. Assessment of quality of life in children with peanut allergy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2003 Oct;14(5):378-82. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3038.2003.00072.x.
Dua S, Ruiz-Garcia M, Bond S, Durham SR, Kimber I, Mills C, Roberts G, Skypala I, Wason J, Ewan P, Boyle R, Clark A. Effect of sleep deprivation and exercise on reaction threshold in adults with peanut allergy: A randomized controlled study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Dec;144(6):1584-1594.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.06.038. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
01.31.09.2011
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.