Development of an Algorithm to Better Predict Clinical Responsiveness to Peanut
NCT ID: NCT00243555
Last Updated: 2007-02-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2002-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Food Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy
NCT04222491
Immune-supportive Diet and Gut Permeability in Allergic Children
NCT05667610
Immune Basis and Clinical Implications of Threshold-based Phenotypes of Peanut Allergy
NCT03907397
Canadian Peanut Thresholds Study
NCT01812798
FARE Peanut SLIT and Early Tolerance Induction
NCT02304991
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The second phase of this study will involve feeding peanut to individuals with positive skin tests, who have never been peanut exposed. Their blood will be examined before and after the challenge using information from Part 1, and results will be correlated with their ability to tolerate peanut on feeding. This study should enable us to better predict who is truly peanut allergic.
There are four groups of patients in this study. Group 1 consists of individuals who are allergic to peanut. This group of individuals will have a positive skin test to peanut and a previous allergi reaction to peanut. Group 2 consists of indivduals who have a positive skin test to peanut but who are able to ingest peanuts without problems. Group 3 consists of individuals who have a positive skin test to peanut but who have no known ingestion of peanut and who have avoided peanut lifelong for whatever reason (e.g. a strong family history of peanut allergy). Lastly, group 4 consists of control subjects who are negative to the peanut skin test and are able to tolerate peanut without problems.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
DEFINED_POPULATION
OTHER
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
allergy skin testing
venepuncture
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Informed consent (Subject has provided an appropriately signed and dated informed consent. An appropriately signed and dated assent must be obtained from the parents or guardian if the subject is a child under 18 years of age.)
* Free of any clinically significant disease, such as uncontrolled asthma, which may interfere with study evaluations
Group 1:
* skin test positive to peanut
* documented clinical history of peanut allergy. A documented clinical history may include symptoms such as hives,swelling of the mouth or tongue, throat closing sensation, shortness of breath, wheezing, lightheadedness, anaphylaxis.
Group 2:
* Positive skin test to peanut
* History of being able to tolerate peanut exposure without problems
Group 3:
* Positive skin test to peanut
* No known ingestion of peanut
Group 4:
* Negative skin test to peanut
* Negative skin test to other food and environmental allergens
* Able to tolerate peanut exposure without problems
Exclusion Criteria
* use of antihistamines or decongestant therapy four days prior to clinic visit
* use of nasal or inhaled corticosteroid in the 1 month period prior to clinic visit
* use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) in the week prior to clinic visit
* Moderate or severe/ uncontrolled asthma (defined as the use of more than 4 puffs of ventolin per day, not including prophylactic medications prior to exercise)
* Symptomatic allergic rhinitis
* Patients who had an acute allergic reaction to food, drugs, and bee sting in the 1 month period prior to clinic visit
* Use of an epi-pen during the past month
* respiratory infection one month prior to clinic visit
* immunotherapy
5 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Food Allergy Initiative
OTHER
AllerGen NCE Inc.
INDUSTRY
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Susan Waserman, MSc, MD, FRCPC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, McMaster Site
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, McMaster Site
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Andrea Marin, MD
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Heaton T, Rowe J, Turner S, Aalberse RC, de Klerk N, Suriyaarachchi D, Serralha M, Holt BJ, Hollams E, Yerkovich S, Holt K, Sly PD, Goldblatt J, Le Souef P, Holt PG. An immunoepidemiological approach to asthma: identification of in-vitro T-cell response patterns associated with different wheezing phenotypes in children. Lancet. 2005 Jan 8-14;365(9454):142-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17704-6.
Turcanu V, Maleki SJ, Lack G. Characterization of lymphocyte responses to peanuts in normal children, peanut-allergic children, and allergic children who acquired tolerance to peanuts. J Clin Invest. 2003 Apr;111(7):1065-72. doi: 10.1172/JCI16142.
Umetsu DT. Revising the immunological theories of asthma and allergy. Lancet. 2005 Jan 8-14;365(9454):98-100. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17714-9. No abstract available.
Kagan RS, Joseph L, Dufresne C, Gray-Donald K, Turnbull E, Pierre YS, Clarke AE. Prevalence of peanut allergy in primary-school children in Montreal, Canada. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003 Dec;112(6):1223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.09.026.
Sampson HA. Update on food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 May;113(5):805-19; quiz 820. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.03.014.
Roberts G, Lack G. Diagnosing peanut allergy with skin prick and specific IgE testing. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Jun;115(6):1291-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.02.038.
van Odijk J, Ahlstedt S, Bengtsson U, Borres MP, Hulthen L. Double-blind placebo-controlled challenges for peanut allergy the efficiency of blinding procedures and the allergenic activity of peanut availability in the recipes. Allergy. 2005 May;60(5):602-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00666.x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FP-2005-25
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2002H05183
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.