Tree Nuts Allergies: Does a Single Nut Allergy Necessitate the Dietary Eviction of Other Tree Nuts?
NCT ID: NCT01744990
Last Updated: 2018-10-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
130 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-10-31
2018-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Re-Introducing Nuts in Allergic Patients
NCT04151069
Study to Assess Tolerance of Traces in Peanut/Tree Nut Allergic Children.
NCT03680066
Immunologic Profile of Children With Severe Allergies to Peanuts and Nuts After Induction of Tolerance
NCT01996774
Accidental Reactions in Peanut/Tree Nut Allergic Children
NCT05671471
Efficacy and Safety of Cashew Nut Oral Immunotherapy in Children
NCT05821621
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Food challenges are the most reliable tests to investigate a possible food allergy, but these are time consuming and may elicit severe reactions in patients with a previous history of anaphylactic reactions(8). There are no allergy tests able at this time to predict with certainty the clinical reactivity, although Sampson et al could identify a general tree nuts specific IgE cut-off level with a high positive predictive value for clinical reactivity.
It could be demonstrated, in well-designed studies, that in vitro cross-sensitivity between tree nuts (members of the oleaginous family) and peanut (members of the legume family) is frequent (86%). However, clinical reactions to tree nuts are estimated to be present in only 40% of peanut allergic patients. Therefore 60% of peanut allergic patients may eat tree nuts without reactions.
Similarly, there is a large in vitro cross-sensitivity between tree nuts. However, it is not known to date if this cross-sensitivity relates to clinical reactivity. Consequently, in case of one tree nut allergy, strict eviction to all nuts is largely recommended, and possibly results in a unnecessary dietary eviction of all tree nuts leading to a high impact on the quality of life of the children.
We aim to identify, based on standardized food provocation tests, which nuts allergic patients need a selective, or a complete dietary eviction of all kind of nuts (nuts being defined as peanut, all tree nuts, pine nut and sesame). We postulate that predictive factors of multiple nut allergy are high specific immunoglobulin E level, positive skin tests and/or clinical markers, such as atopic dermatitis, presence of other food allergies or a history of a severe previous reaction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Interventional single arm
Single group of children undergoing the same investigations and follow up
Oral food challenges to multiple nuts
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Oral food challenges to multiple nuts
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Children with convincing history of IgE-mediated systemic allergic reaction (not only oral symptoms) after consumption of one or more "nuts" (peanut, hazelnut, walnut, almond, cashew, pecan, Brazil, macadamia, pine nut, sesame) within last 12 months and SPT \> 3 mm and/or positive specific IgE (\>0.1 kU/l).
* Children without a convincing history of IgE-mediated systemic allergic reaction (for example only oral symptoms) after consumption of one or more "nuts" (peanut, hazelnut, walnut, almond, cashew, pecan, brazil, macadamia, pistachio, pine nut, sesame) but with clear evidence of sensitization (SPT \> 3 mm and/or positive specific IgE (\> 0.1 kU/l) and a positive standardized food challenge to the nut.
* Informed consent approved and signed by the patient's legal representative and, if applicable, by the child itself.
Exclusion Criteria
* Chronic urticaria
* Children with a chronic systemic disease
* Children who are dependent on daily antihistamine use
12 Months
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Allergistiftung Ulrich Müller
UNKNOWN
Food Allergy Research & Education
OTHER
University Hospital, Geneva
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Philippe Eigenmann
Head, Pediatric Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Philippe A Eigenmann, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Hospital, Geneva
Gideon Lack, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
St. Thomas' Hospital, London (UK)
Antonio Nieto, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Hospital Infantil La Fe, Valencia, Spain
Helen Brough, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St. Thomas' Hospital, London (UK)
Haddad Diab, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St. Peter's Hospital, Surrey (UK)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Infantil La Fe
Valencia, , Spain
University Hospital Geneva
Geneva, Canton of Geneva, Switzerland
St. Peter's Hospital
Chertsey, Surrey, United Kingdom
St. Thomas' Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CER12-020
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.