Mechanisms Underlying Peanut Allergic Reactions in TRACE Peanut Study Participants: Extension Study

NCT ID: NCT02665793

Last Updated: 2019-10-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

17 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-08-31

Study Completion Date

2017-05-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Food allergy affects up to 10% of the population. The mainstay of management involves dietary avoidance and provision of rescue medication in the event of an accidental reaction. The Integrated approaches to food allergen and allergy management (iFAAM) collaboration is an EU-funded academic/clinical/industry consortium with the aim to improve allergen risk management including food labelling. Much of this work requires the validation of the minimum 'eliciting dose' for the food-allergic population and how this can be translated into risk management.

A number of studies (including iFAAM and the TRACE study - NCT01429896) have assessed the eliciting dose for peanut allergic patients, using food challenges where peanut-allergic individuals are eat incremental doses of peanut under strict medical supervision.

In this extension study, peanut-allergic subjects will have undergone (in a cross-over manner) three double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges to peanut:

1. incremental doses of peanut in a water-continuous matrix;
2. incremental doses of peanut baked into a cookie biscuit;
3. a single dose of peanut in a water-continuous matrix.

The differences in eliciting dose, symptom pattern and underlying physiological mechanisms will provide essential data on how the presentation and consumption of peanut affects the amount needed to trigger an allergic reaction, to inform industry and food regulators as to how to best protect the food-allergic population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Food Hypersensitivity Peanut Hypersensitivity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DBPCFC to peanut cookie, then single-dose DBPCFC x 2

Patients will undergo 3 sets of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC):

1. DBPCFC to incremental doses of peanut (or placebo) baked into a cookie biscuit
2. DBPCFC to a single dose of peanut (or placebo) equivalent to 1 dosing interval below that to which that patient reacted at the baseline DBPCFC to gain entry to the study, on two separate occasions

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DBPCFC to peanut cookie

Intervention Type OTHER

Single-dose DBPCFC to peanut flour

Intervention Type OTHER

Single-dose DBPCFC to peanut in a water-continuous matrix, at a cumulative dose one dosing level below that individual's threshold (established at the baseline challenge). If no reaction is seen, participants will be given the next dosing level.

Single-dose DBPCFC to peanut butter

Intervention Type OTHER

Single-dose DBPCFC to peanut in a water-continuous matrix, at a cumulative dose one dosing level below that individual's threshold (established at the baseline challenge). If no reaction is seen, participants will be given the next dosing level.

Single dose DBPCFC x 2, then DBPCFC to peanut cookie

Patients will undergo 3 sets of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC):

1. DBPCFC to a single dose of peanut (or placebo) equivalent to 1 dosing interval below that to which that patient reacted at the baseline DBPCFC to gain entry to the study, on two separate occasions
2. DBPCFC to incremental doses of peanut (or placebo) baked into a cookie biscuit

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DBPCFC to peanut cookie

Intervention Type OTHER

Single-dose DBPCFC to peanut flour

Intervention Type OTHER

Single-dose DBPCFC to peanut in a water-continuous matrix, at a cumulative dose one dosing level below that individual's threshold (established at the baseline challenge). If no reaction is seen, participants will be given the next dosing level.

Single-dose DBPCFC to peanut butter

Intervention Type OTHER

Single-dose DBPCFC to peanut in a water-continuous matrix, at a cumulative dose one dosing level below that individual's threshold (established at the baseline challenge). If no reaction is seen, participants will be given the next dosing level.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DBPCFC to peanut cookie

Intervention Type OTHER

Single-dose DBPCFC to peanut flour

Single-dose DBPCFC to peanut in a water-continuous matrix, at a cumulative dose one dosing level below that individual's threshold (established at the baseline challenge). If no reaction is seen, participants will be given the next dosing level.

Intervention Type OTHER

Single-dose DBPCFC to peanut butter

Single-dose DBPCFC to peanut in a water-continuous matrix, at a cumulative dose one dosing level below that individual's threshold (established at the baseline challenge). If no reaction is seen, participants will be given the next dosing level.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Written informed consent.
* Male and female participants in the TRACE study (NCT01429896) who are 18-45 years of age at the time of entry to the TRACE study (Visit 1) and had a positive DBPCFC to peanut at baseline (Visit 1).

Exclusion Criteria

* unable to comply with study procedures
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Manchester

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Food Standards Agency, United Kingdom

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Imperial College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Paul Turner

Clinician Scientist and Hon Consultant in Paediatric Allergy & Immunology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clare Mills, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Manchester

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Turner PJ, Ruiz-Garcia M, Patel N, Abrantes G, Burrell S, Vazquez-Ortiz M, Skypala I, Durham SR, Boyle RJ. Delayed symptoms and orthostatic intolerance following peanut challenge. Clin Exp Allergy. 2021 May;51(5):696-702. doi: 10.1111/cea.13865. Epub 2021 Mar 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33715235 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FP7-KBBE 312147

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

15SM2445 vs4.1 27.12.2015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Food Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy
NCT04222491 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE2
Study of Tolerance to Oral Peanut
NCT01259804 COMPLETED PHASE1
Tolerance Following Peanut Oral Immunotherapy
NCT01750879 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Canadian Peanut Thresholds Study
NCT01812798 UNKNOWN NA
Improved Diagnostics in Food Allergy Study
NCT06097572 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Persistence of Oral Tolerance to Peanut
NCT01366846 COMPLETED PHASE2