Oral Immunotherapy for Young Children With Peanut Allergy - Small Children OIT
NCT ID: NCT04511494
Last Updated: 2025-06-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
114 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-01
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Peanut OIT with slow up-dosing (40-60 weeks) up to a maintenance dose of 285 mg daily oral peanut protein or
2. Control group with peanut allergic children who do not undergo OIT.
3. In addition, a group of healthy children without allergic diseases will be included in the study.
The primary outcome is tolerance to at least 750 mg peanut protein at a challenge after 3 years and sustained unresponsiveness (i.e. tolerance) to 750 mg peanut protein after 3 years of OIT followed by 4-6 weeks of avoidance.
Efficacy and safety will be compared between group 1 and 2. Group 3 is a control group for analyses of immunological markers.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Food Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy
NCT04222491
Tolerance Following Peanut Oral Immunotherapy
NCT01750879
A Study of Sublingual Immunotherapy in Peanut-allergic Children
NCT00597727
The Peanut Oral Immunotherapy Study: Safety, Efficacy and Discovery
NCT02103270
Study of Tolerance to Oral Peanut
NCT01259804
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Intervention: Peanut OIT in children aged 1-3 years with peanut allergy (clinical symptoms at peanut challenge and IgE \>0.1 kU /l to peanut and/or Ara h 2).
Comparison: Three groups are compared. Peanut allergic children are randomized 2:1 to group 1 (active OIT) or group 2 (control). Group 3 consists of age-matched non-allergic children:
Group 1; Children with peanut allergy receiving peanut OIT, slow up-dosing, 40-60 weeks, until the maintenance dose 285 mg peanut protein. Three years' treatment. (n=50 patients)
Group 2; Age-matched children with peanut allergy who do not undergo OIT peanut (peanut avoidance group). Peanut challenges are performed one and three years after inclusion. (n=25 patients)
Group 3; Healthy, non-allergic, age-matched children. No challenges are performed in this group. (n=30 patients)
Group 4; Children not reacting at the baseline peanut challenge (n=9 patients)
Inclusion of study subjects: A review of samples sent to the Karolinska University Laboratory for IgE-ab responses to peanut/Ara h 2 for children in the Stockholm area aged 1-3 years is used for identification of potential participants to whom a letter is sent with information about the study. The families are randomized 2:1 to OIT or control group, group 1 or group 2.
Children without allergies, healthy controls (group 3), will be included from Västerås Hospital.
If children are included in the study but they do not not react at the baseline peanutchallenge, they will not have any intervention (are not eligible to randomisation) and will have a follow-up after 1+3 years (without peanut challenges), group 4.
Outcomes: The primary outcome is defined as sustained unresponsiveness to 750 mg peanut protein (cumulative dose) at an open oral peanut challenge after 3 years of OIT followed by 4-6 weeks of avoidance (group 1 and 2).
Secondary outcomes are adverse events among peanut allergic children with/without OIT treatment (group 1 and 2), and changes in quality of life parameters and immunological markers (group, 1, 2, 3).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
After the child is randomised to treatment or avoidance, everyone (particpant, care provider and investigator) know if the child is in the treatment or avoidance group.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
OIT peanut
Children with peanut allergy receiving peanut OIT. Peanut challenge are done before randomization and one and three years after inclusion.
n=50 patients
Peanut (bamba)
OIT peanut with slow-updosing for 40-60 weeks followed by maintenance. 3 years treatment.
Peanut avoidance
Children with peanut allergy not undergoing OIT peanut. Peanut challenge are done Before randomization and one and three years after inclusion.
n=25 patients
No interventions assigned to this group
Healthy controls
Control Group with non-allergic, age-matched children. No challenges are performed in this group.
n=30 patients
No interventions assigned to this group
Children not reacting at the baseline peanut challenge
Peanut-allergic children not reacting at the baseline peanut challenge, will not be eligible for randomisation. They will have a clinical visit after 1+3 years. No more challenges in this group.
n=X patients
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Peanut (bamba)
OIT peanut with slow-updosing for 40-60 weeks followed by maintenance. 3 years treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Positive baseline challenge at a maximum of the 250 mg peanut protein-dose with at least one objective symptom, or positive peanut challenge performed in the clinic in a similar way within 1 year from study start.
* IgE-ab to peanut and/or Ara h 2 ≥0.1 kUA/l, analyzed within 12 months from start of study
* Written consent for participation in the study from both Guardians
Exclusion Criteria
* Previously life-threatening anaphylaxis (intensive care), regardless of the triggering agent
* A history of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), other eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease, severe chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), symptoms of dysphagia, unclear recurrent GI disorders
* Participation in another intervention study, if included in intervention Group
* Severe uncontrolled asthma
* Ongoing medication with biological drugs or oral steroids
1 Year
3 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Stockholm South General Hospital
OTHER
Karolinska Institutet
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Carina Uhl
PhD student
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anna Asarnoj
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Karolinska Institutet
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Forskningsenheten Södersjukhuset
Stockholm, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019-04645
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.