The Effectiveness of Computerized Auditory Training Programme on Children With Auditory Processing Disorder

NCT ID: NCT02111343

Last Updated: 2014-04-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

39 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-10-31

Study Completion Date

2011-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The current study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a Computer-based auditory training (CBAT) intervention for children with Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD) by comparing the changes in auditory processing (AP) and functional listening skills of these children immediately post-intervention, to that of the untrained controls. The AP skills of the trained group were evaluated again at 3 months post-intervention to examine the sustainability of any improvements made from the CBAT intervention. I hypothesised that after intervention, children from the auditory training (AT) group would improve in their AP skills, and that improvement would be greater than the changes in AP skills of those untrained controls. I also hypothesised that the improvement made from the intervention would sustain for at least 3 months after the end of intervention. Finally, I examined if the training outcomes are predictable from any underlying factors such as the initial AP, language, or cognitive skills of these children.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This prospective study incorporated a parallel group design that randomly assigned participants identified with CAPD to an auditory training (AT) group or a no intervention (Control) group. Both groups were matched for age and gender. Baseline measures were conducted prior to the randomisation process.

Participants from the AT group were given a 3-month home therapy using a CBAT programme developed for this study, while participants from the control group received no intervention for the same period of time. Apart from regular school attendance and activities, all participants were requested to discontinue any other auditory-based interventions, which might affect the outcomes of this study. All the participants were assessed again after the conclusion of the training period.

After the end of the intervention, participants from the AT group were requested to undergo a no-intervention phase for a period of 3 months before another assessment. This was intended to examine the sustainability of any improvement made through the CBAT programme.

An auditory test and two validated questionnaires were used as outcome measures, administered at baseline, and at post-3 months (immediately post-intervention).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Central Auditory Processing Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Computer-based auditory training (CBAT)

The CBAT programmes in the current study were specifically designed to improve speech-in-noise and dichotic listening skills of children diagnosed with CAPD. All the training programmes were designed to be installed on home-user's computer, and they were visually attractive and appealing to children. The development of the software (non commercial) for the speech-in-noise and dichotic listening training was done by two different teams in the United Kingdom and Singapore, respectively.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Computer-based auditory training (CBAT)

Intervention Type OTHER

There are 3 listening games (i.e. Doggy, Who-Is-Right, Story-in-noise) that target on speech-in-noise training and 1 listening game (i.e. TATP) that aims to train dichotic listening.

Patient was required to undergo the training for 30 minutes per day, 5 sessions per week, for a duration of 12 weeks. Parents were advised to keep a journal to record child's training hour of the day.

Control

No intervention other than participants' regular school activities

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Computer-based auditory training (CBAT)

There are 3 listening games (i.e. Doggy, Who-Is-Right, Story-in-noise) that target on speech-in-noise training and 1 listening game (i.e. TATP) that aims to train dichotic listening.

Patient was required to undergo the training for 30 minutes per day, 5 sessions per week, for a duration of 12 weeks. Parents were advised to keep a journal to record child's training hour of the day.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Presentation to the clinic with reported symptoms of listening difficulties.
* No measurable peripheral hearing anomalies in both ears, i.e. normal cochlea and middle ear function, as judged by normal audiometric thresholds of 20dB HL or better in the speech frequency range of 250-8000 Hz, and normal impedance audiometry.
* Performance on the behavioural AP test battery (Table 6.1) which met the following criteria:

* At least two abnormalities in the non-speech or minimally-linguistic loaded tasks.
* No indication of any other underlying higher order cognitive problems as judged by abnormal performance scores in all the tasks in AP test battery.
* Normal intelligence, as judged by having a nonverbal IQ score of more than 85 (Test of Nonverbal Intelligence, TONI).

Exclusion Criteria

* one with medical or developmental conditions, i.e. epilepsy, global developmental delay, pervasive learning disorder such as autism, which may additionally impact on auditory or cognitive performance.
Minimum Eligible Age

7 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National University Health System, Singapore

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Jenny Loo

Principal Audiologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jenny HY Loo, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National University Health System

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National University Hospital

Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Singapore

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

D/09/485

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Impacts of Training on Effortful Listening
NCT04921267 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1
Spacing Lidcombe Program Clinic Visits
NCT00680303 UNKNOWN PHASE2