A Comparison of Targinact vs. Oxycodone on Gut Function After Colorectal Surgery
NCT ID: NCT02109640
Last Updated: 2017-03-29
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-10-31
2015-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Targinact is a combination of prolonged release opioid analgesic (oxycodone hydrochloride) and naloxone hydrochloride (an opioid receptor blocker). The formulation of the product confines the naloxone action to the gut to reduce the unwanted side-effects on gut function. Targinact has been shown in patients with chronic severe pain to provide comparable analgesia to other opioid analgesics whilst reducing the unwanted side-effect of constipation.
The Investigators wish to test the hypothesis that Targinact will provide adequate analgesia after colonic resection with reduced postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction. The surgical procedure chosen to test this hypothesis is laparoscopic segmental colectomy, a consistently reproducible intervention with a postoperative gut dysfunction rate of up to 40% (prospective data from the Edinburgh Colorectal Unit). The main outcome of the study will be return of normal gut function at the time of planned discharge (Day 3).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Naloxegol in the Prevention of POI After Cystectomy
NCT04219046
Trial of a Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
NCT00830089
The Effect of Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery on Early Quality of Recovery
NCT03608436
Optimisation and Performance of Reduced Preparation CT Colography
NCT00212433
Development of a Patient Reported Outcome Measure for GastroIntestinal Recovery
NCT05315765
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Up to 40% of patients suffer delayed return of gut function after elective colorectal surgery, leading to prolonged hospital stay and higher inpatient costs. For the patient, this is characterised by a variety of symptoms including nausea and vomiting, delayed ability to regain normal oral intake, abdominal discomfort/distension and constipation. Although post-operative gut dysfunction tends to resolve spontaneously in 3-7 days, both symptoms and supportive treatment (nasogastric tube insertion, repeated venous cannulation for intravenous fluid administration etc) are unpleasant.
Elective colorectal surgery is a common hospital intervention hence a reduction in the prevalence of post-operative gut dysfunction would be expected to benefit a large number of patients with attendant reduction in health service costs. The objective aligns well with the current national dissemination of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery programmes by the UK Department of Health and Scottish Government.
Post-operative gut dysfunction is multifactorial. Opioid analgesics are contributory and all Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) programmes emphasise strategies to minimise systemic opioid use (eg using regional or local anaesthetic techniques).
Targinact has not been evaluated in the setting of short-term post operative analgesia in colorectal surgery but offers the potential to achieve effective analgesia with a lower incidence of gut dysfunction and therefore an important role within the ERAS program after colorectal surgery. Oxycodone is currently the oral opioid analgesic of choice in our unit and most patients are prescribed a combination of oxycodone and oxynorm as step-down analgesia following cessation of systemic or epidural analgesia, often in combination with fentanyl patches.
Data will be collected from patient hospital records and questionnaires administered by the principal investigator and research study nurse.
Multiple measures will be employed to record both presence of good function and absence of dysfunction.
* Time to first flatus
* Time to first bowel movement
* Time from surgery to cessation of iv fluids
* Total dose of rescue antiemetic (protocol ondansetron not included)
* Reinstitution of iv fluids (Y/N) Quantity of laxative used
* Measurement of oral nutritional intake:
Preoperative intake will be recorded by means of a recall diary. Postoperative oral intake will be recorded by the participant using a food diary for 7 days from the date of surgery. Energy intake will then be estimated using CompEat Pro® forWindows® (Nutrition Systems, Banbury, UK). Time to attain and maintain 80% of normal solid food intake and the percentage Recommended Nutritional Intake (RNI) achieved on days 1-3 and days 5-7 after surgery will be used in comparisons between study groups.
* Validated nausea and vomiting score (Miles and Wengritzky)
* Presence of abdominal distension (Y/N)
* 13C Stable Isotope Gastric Empyting Breath Test to measure gastric motility on the second postoperative morning. The technique has been previously used in the Edinburgh Department of Surgery and validated to be a reproducible and accurate measurement of upper GI motility.
Additional data to be recorded:
* Patient demographics, co morbidity, regular medications
* Pre op bowel function questionnaire
* Postoperative nausea and vomiting prediction data (Apfel score)
* Day 3 achievement of discharge criteria (pain controlled by oral analgesia, tolerating adequate oral diet and fluids, independently mobile and willing to go home) Y/N
* 30-day/Inpatient mortality
* Duration of hospital admission
* Complications (recorded by organ system and severity as assessed by Clavien/Dindo scale)
* Unscheduled readmissions to hospital within 30 days of discharge
* Patient-reported outcome questionnaire
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Targinact
Oral Targinact 10-20mg bd following laparoscopic segmental colectomy
Targinact
Post-operative analgesia
Laparoscopic segmental colectomy
Oxycodone
Oral oxycodone 10-20mg bd following laparoscopic segmental colectomy
Oxycodone
Postoperative analgesia
Laparoscopic segmental colectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Targinact
Post-operative analgesia
Oxycodone
Postoperative analgesia
Laparoscopic segmental colectomy
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Edinburgh
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hugh M Paterson, MD FRCS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Edinburgh
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Western General Hospital
Edinburgh, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, Cox PB, Hendry PO, Spies C, von Meyenfeldt MF, Fearon KC, Revhaug A, Norderval S, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Dejong CH; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg. 2009 Oct;144(10):961-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.170.
Hendry PO, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Dejong CH, Ljungqvist O, Fearon KC; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Study Group. Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg. 2009 Feb;96(2):197-205. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6445.
Simpson K, Leyendecker P, Hopp M, Muller-Lissner S, Lowenstein O, De Andres J, Troy Ferrarons J, Bosse B, Krain B, Nichols T, Kremers W, Reimer K. Fixed-ratio combination oxycodone/naloxone compared with oxycodone alone for the relief of opioid-induced constipation in moderate-to-severe noncancer pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Dec;24(12):3503-12. doi: 10.1185/03007990802584454.
Creamer F, Balfour A, Nimmo S, Foo I, Norrie JD, Williams LJ, Fearon KC, Paterson HM. Randomized open-label phase II study comparing oxycodone-naloxone with oxycodone in early return of gastrointestinal function after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2017 Jan;104(1):42-51. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10322. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2013-005327-16
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.