The Effect of Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery on Early Quality of Recovery

NCT ID: NCT03608436

Last Updated: 2021-10-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

178 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-24

Study Completion Date

2021-06-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Randomised controlled trial comparing the effect of low pressure pneumoperitoneum with deep neuromuscular block versus normal pressure pneumoperitoneum with moderate neuromuscular block during laparoscopic colorectal surgery on early quality of recovery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale: the laparoscopic approach reduced trauma as compared to open surgery, however, the pressure used to create a PNP with sufficient surgical workspace still leads to significant tissue injury. Prior studies show that the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (PNP) during laparoscopic surgery reduced postoperative pain scores, cumulative opioid consumption and improved bowel function recovery. Deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) as compared to moderate NMB decreases the amount of intra-abdominal pressure required to achieve similar surgical conditions and enables the use of low-pressure PNP without compromising the quality of the surgical field and patient safety. Therefore, the use of deep NMB with low-pressure PNP could be a significant addition to the conventional Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols.

Objective: to establish the relationship between the use of low pressure pneumoperitoneum with deep neuromuscular blockade and the early quality of recovery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Study design: a multi-center, blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial.

Study population: adult individuals scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal surgery with a primary colonic anastomosis.

Intervention: participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to either the experimental group (group A): low pressure PNP (8 mmHg) with deep NMB (PTC 1-2) or the control group (group B): normal pressure PNP (12 mmHg) with moderate NMB (TOF count 1-2).

Primary endpoint: Quality of recovery score (QoR-40) 24 hours after surgery.

Secondary endpoints: QoR-40 score (day 3 and 7 after surgery), McGill pain- and RAND-36 score (1 day before and 3 months after surgery), pain scores, PONV, analgesia use, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, surgical conditions and time to reach discharge criteria.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pneumoperitoneum Neuromuscular Blockade Surgery

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Quality of recovery Laparoscopic surgery Deep neuromuscular block Low pressure pneumoperitoneum

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Low pressure PNP, deep NMB

Low pressure pneumoperitoneum of 8 mmHg with deep neuromuscular block (post tetanic count of 1-2) reached by titration with continuous infusion of Rocuronium bromide.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Low pressure pneumoperitoneum

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Lowering intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopic surgery

Rocuronium Bromide

Intervention Type DRUG

Deep (PTC 1-2) versus moderate (Tof count 1-2) neuromuscular block

Normal pressure PNP, moderate NMB

Normal pressure pneumoperitoneum of 12 mmHg with moderate neuromuscular block (TOF count of 1-2) reached by titration with bolus or continuous infusion of a low dose of Rocuronium bromide.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rocuronium Bromide

Intervention Type DRUG

Deep (PTC 1-2) versus moderate (Tof count 1-2) neuromuscular block

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Low pressure pneumoperitoneum

Lowering intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopic surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Rocuronium Bromide

Deep (PTC 1-2) versus moderate (Tof count 1-2) neuromuscular block

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Low intra-abdominal pressure Deep muscle relaxation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal surgery with a primary anastomosis
* Obtained informed consent
* Age over 18 years

Exclusion Criteria

* Insufficient control of the Dutch language to read the patient information and to fill out the questionnaires
* Primary colostomy
* Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
* Chronic use of analgesics or psychotropic drugs
* Use of NSAIDs shorter than 5 days before surgery
* Known or suspected allergy to rocuronium of sugammadex
* Neuromuscular disease
* Indication for rapid sequence induction
* Severe liver- or renal disease (creatinine clearance \<30ml/min)
* BMI \>35 kg/m²
* Deficiency of vitamin K dependent clotting factors or coagulopathy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Radboud University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kim I Albers, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Radboud University Medical Center

Michiel C Warlé, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Radboud University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital

Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands

Site Status

Martini general hospital

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Maxima Medisch Centrum

Veldhoven, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Albers KI, Polat F, Panhuizen IF, Snoeck MMJ, Scheffer GJ, de Boer HD, Warle MC. The effect of low- versus normal-pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic colorectal surgery on the early quality of recovery with perioperative care according to the enhanced recovery principles (RECOVER): study protocol for a randomized controlled study. Trials. 2020 Jun 17;21(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04496-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32552782 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL65290.091.18

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id