The Effect of Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery on Early Quality of Recovery
NCT ID: NCT03608436
Last Updated: 2021-10-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
178 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-10-24
2021-06-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: to establish the relationship between the use of low pressure pneumoperitoneum with deep neuromuscular blockade and the early quality of recovery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Study design: a multi-center, blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial.
Study population: adult individuals scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal surgery with a primary colonic anastomosis.
Intervention: participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to either the experimental group (group A): low pressure PNP (8 mmHg) with deep NMB (PTC 1-2) or the control group (group B): normal pressure PNP (12 mmHg) with moderate NMB (TOF count 1-2).
Primary endpoint: Quality of recovery score (QoR-40) 24 hours after surgery.
Secondary endpoints: QoR-40 score (day 3 and 7 after surgery), McGill pain- and RAND-36 score (1 day before and 3 months after surgery), pain scores, PONV, analgesia use, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, surgical conditions and time to reach discharge criteria.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low pressure PNP, deep NMB
Low pressure pneumoperitoneum of 8 mmHg with deep neuromuscular block (post tetanic count of 1-2) reached by titration with continuous infusion of Rocuronium bromide.
Low pressure pneumoperitoneum
Lowering intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopic surgery
Rocuronium Bromide
Deep (PTC 1-2) versus moderate (Tof count 1-2) neuromuscular block
Normal pressure PNP, moderate NMB
Normal pressure pneumoperitoneum of 12 mmHg with moderate neuromuscular block (TOF count of 1-2) reached by titration with bolus or continuous infusion of a low dose of Rocuronium bromide.
Rocuronium Bromide
Deep (PTC 1-2) versus moderate (Tof count 1-2) neuromuscular block
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Low pressure pneumoperitoneum
Lowering intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopic surgery
Rocuronium Bromide
Deep (PTC 1-2) versus moderate (Tof count 1-2) neuromuscular block
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Obtained informed consent
* Age over 18 years
Exclusion Criteria
* Primary colostomy
* Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
* Chronic use of analgesics or psychotropic drugs
* Use of NSAIDs shorter than 5 days before surgery
* Known or suspected allergy to rocuronium of sugammadex
* Neuromuscular disease
* Indication for rapid sequence induction
* Severe liver- or renal disease (creatinine clearance \<30ml/min)
* BMI \>35 kg/m²
* Deficiency of vitamin K dependent clotting factors or coagulopathy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
INDUSTRY
Radboud University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kim I Albers, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radboud University Medical Center
Michiel C Warlé, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radboud University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Martini general hospital
Groningen, , Netherlands
Maxima Medisch Centrum
Veldhoven, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Albers KI, Polat F, Panhuizen IF, Snoeck MMJ, Scheffer GJ, de Boer HD, Warle MC. The effect of low- versus normal-pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic colorectal surgery on the early quality of recovery with perioperative care according to the enhanced recovery principles (RECOVER): study protocol for a randomized controlled study. Trials. 2020 Jun 17;21(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04496-8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL65290.091.18
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id