Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Colonic Resection
NCT ID: NCT01339273
Last Updated: 2020-02-05
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
72 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-09-30
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block is a technique which numbs the nerves carrying pain sensation from the abdominal wall and provides effective and safe analgesia with minimal systemic side effects. Their perceived benefits are thought to relate to reduced opioid consumption and therefore reduced opioid side effects. The investigators believe ultrasound guided TAP blocks will reduce pain and morphine consumption with a resultant improved patient satisfaction, earlier return of bowel function and earlier hospital discharge.
The key research question the investigators are trying to answer is whether TAP block provide better pain relief than local anaesthetic infiltration of the laparoscopic port sites. Both techniques are currently being used in our hospital and a retrospective audit demonstrated better analgesia and lower consumption of morphine in the TAP block group.The differences were not statistically significant as the number patients in the audit were not large enough.The investigators are hoping that this study will demonstrate that the difference is real by recruiting the necessary number of patients into each group (36 per group)
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Trial of a Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
NCT00830089
the Effect of the Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block on the Minimal Laparotomy : a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT01418391
Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Left Hemicolectomy
NCT03458689
The Comparison of Postoperative Pain After Colon Resection in Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia Between Conventional Mode and Optimizing B.I Mode With 'PAINSTOP' Equipment
NCT03011359
Intraperitoneal Local Anaesthetic in Colonic Surgery
NCT00722709
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A double blind design was chosen to eliminate patient and observer bias in reporting of pain scores.
The presence of the control arm will ensure that any difference observed will be due to the effect of sensory nerve block due to the TAP block than due to the systemic effect of the injected local anaesthetic.
The null hypothesis will be that there is no difference between the groups in the amount of morphine consumed by the patients during 48 hours after the operation. We chose this measurement as an objective but indirect measurement of efficacy of TAP block and pain relief thus received. Measurement of pain with various scoring methods are reliable only when concurrent reduction in consumption of pain killers are demonstrated.
Recruitment and randomisation:
All patients meeting the inclusion criteria will receive a patient information leaflet and an invitation letter to participate in the study during the pre-assessment visit. We aim to recruit 72 patients (36 patients per group).
Informed consent will be taken by one of the investigators on the morning of the surgery, if the exclusion criteria are not applicable. Patients will be allotted consecutive participant numbers starting from one. Patients will be randomly allocated into either the study group and a control group. Randomisation will occur by using computer generated random numbers. Group allocation will be kept in a consecutively numbered, opaque, sealed envelope in the controlled drugs cupboard in theatre-6 anaesthetic room of Churchill hospital.Once patient has consented, the anaesthetist will open the corresponding numbered envelope and perform bilateral TAP blocks after induction of general anaesthesia, if the patient is in the study group the surgeons will infiltrate the port sites with local anaesthetic at the end of the procedure if the patient is in the control group.
Blinding:
The study group will receive bilateral TAP blocks with 20mls 0.25% bupivacaine on each side and the skin punctures on either sides will be covered with a small plaster. Patients in the control group will receive subcutaneous infiltration of the laparoscopic port sites and specimen extraction site with equivalent amount bupivacaine at the end of the procedure and small plasters will be stuck on either flanks approximately where the skin punctures for TAP block will be made.
The assessor of pain scores and morphine doses (Recovery nurse \& Colo-rectal house officer) and the patient will be blinded to group allocation.
Patient: Plasters will be stuck on flanks of all the patients both study and control group so that patient will not know if they have received TAP block.
Recovery nurse: During handover to recovery the anaesthetist and scrub nurse will not mention about group allocation.
Colo-rectal house officer: The house officers( Junior Doctors) who will be following up in the ward will not present in the operating theatre, so they will be blinded
The study duration will be from induction of anaesthesia until the patients are medically fit for discharge from hospital. No extra visits other than routinely required for the surgical procedure is expected.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TAP block
Patients in this arm will receive ultrasound guided TAP bock with Bupivacaine 0.25% 20ml per side or to a maximum 1mg/kg per side and the skin puncture will be covered with a small plaster
Ultrasound guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) bock
Ultrasound guided TAP bock with Bupivacaine 0.25% 20ml per side or to a maximum 1mg/kg per side and the skin puncture will be covered with a small plaster
Local anaesthetic infiltration
Laparoscopic port sites and specimen extraction site will be infiltrated with a total of 40 mls 0.25% bupivacaine subcutaneously at the end of the procedure in the control group and plasters will be stuck on either side approximately where a skin puncture for tap block would be made.
Local anaesthetic infiltration of laparoscopic port sites
Laparoscopic port sites and specimen extraction site will be infiltrated with a total of 40 mls 0.25% bupivacaine subcutaneously at the end of the procedure in the control group and plasters will be stuck on either side approximately where a skin puncture for tap block would be made.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) bock
Ultrasound guided TAP bock with Bupivacaine 0.25% 20ml per side or to a maximum 1mg/kg per side and the skin puncture will be covered with a small plaster
Local anaesthetic infiltration of laparoscopic port sites
Laparoscopic port sites and specimen extraction site will be infiltrated with a total of 40 mls 0.25% bupivacaine subcutaneously at the end of the procedure in the control group and plasters will be stuck on either side approximately where a skin puncture for tap block would be made.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
* Undergoing elective laparoscopic high anterior resection without stoma or laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.
* American Society of Anaesthetists physical status (ASA) 1-3
Exclusion Criteria
* Chronic abdominal pain
* Allergy/Intolerance: Morphine, local anaesthetics
* BMI\>35 Kg/M2
* Previous major abdominal surgery
* High likelihood of conversion to open procedure
* Patients unable to communicate in written and spoken English
* Weight less than 50 kg
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr Nicholas Crabtree
Consultant Anaesthetist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nicholas Crabtree, MB,ChB, FRCA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust , Oxford
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Churchill Hospital, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS trust
Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zafar N, Davies R, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR. The evolution of analgesia in an 'accelerated' recovery programme for resectional laparoscopic colorectal surgery with anastomosis. Colorectal Dis. 2010 Feb;12(2):119-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01768.x. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
McDonnell JG, O'Donnell B, Curley G, Heffernan A, Power C, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jan;104(1):193-7. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000250223.49963.0f.
McDonnell JG, O'Donnell BD, Farrell T, Gough N, Tuite D, Power C, Laffey JG. Transversus abdominis plane block: a cadaveric and radiological evaluation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;32(5):399-404. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.03.011.
El-Dawlatly AA, Turkistani A, Kettner SC, Machata AM, Delvi MB, Thallaj A, Kapral S, Marhofer P. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: description of a new technique and comparison with conventional systemic analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;102(6):763-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep067. Epub 2009 Apr 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Sponsorship review number:113
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.