Peri-Operative Surgical Care Optimisation for Patients Requiring Emergency Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06972017

Last Updated: 2025-05-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

112 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-30

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Emergency General Surgery (EGS) is an umbrella term which describes all patients presenting to hospital with an acute abdominal problem. Patients can have various conditions requiring emergency operations. EGS is one of the most common reasons for an emergency admission in the UK.

EGS is often referred to as "high-risk" surgery. For those patients who do survive after their surgery, many struggle with frailty and new medical problems resulting in a reduction in their quality of life (QoL).

The goal of this observational study is to explore QoL and decision-making in EGS through questionnaires and interviews with patients, families/supporters and consultants working in EGS.

Workstream 1 will involve patients and families/supporters. Workstream 2 will involve consultants.

The investigators are interested in patients who have either undergone EGS (EmLaps) or have needed but not undergone EGS (NoLaps). The investigators are interested in exploring participants (patients, families/supporters and consultants) experiences of this EmLap vs NoLap decision.

The main questions the investigators want to answer are:

* What is the long-term QOL of EmLap/NoLap patients and their family/supporters?
* How do patients and their family/supporters describe their experience of decision-making in EGS?
* What are consultant's experiences and views on decision-making in EGS?

Workstream 1 participants (patients and family members/supporters) will complete questionnaires and take part in interviews at different time-points following their decision (1 month/3 months/ 9-12 months). Questionnaires and interviews will explore QoL and decision-making in EGS.

Consultant participants will be asked to complete an online survey and/or take part in an individual interview. Both will explore decision-making in EGS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Quality of Life (QOL) Decision Making Emergency General Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EmLap patients

Patients who have underwent Emergency General Surgery

No interventions assigned to this group

NoLap patients

Patients who have needed but not undergone Emergency General Surgery.

No interventions assigned to this group

Families/Supporters

Family or supporter nominated by the patient participant to participate in the study alongside them.

No interventions assigned to this group

Consultants

Consultants who actively participate in Emergency General Surgery in a UK-based Hospital (Surgeons, Anaesthetists, Intensivists)

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \>65 years old
* Able to communicate in English
* Cognitively able to complete the survey/interviews
* Able to provide informed, voluntary consent
* First line treatment is expedited, urgent or emergency abdominal surgery on the gastrointestinal tract
* Surgery can be laparoscopic or open approach


* Identified by the patient participant (only approached if nominated by patient)
* Age \>18 years old
* Able to communicate in English
* Cognitively able to complete the survey/interviews
* Able to provide informed, voluntary consent


* Key decision-makers will be identified in workstream 1 (likely: surgeons, intensivists and anaesthetists)
* Post-CCT (Certificate of Completion of Training)
* Participate in active on-call for EGS in a UK-based Hospital where they make decisions in EGS regularly

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \<65 years old
* NoLaps should be excluded if management involved interventional radiology or endoscopic procedures
* Patients who are offered a period of conservative treatment are not automatically NoLap if surgery may ultimately be offered
* Diagnosis of dementia or long-standing cognitive impairment
* Elective laparotomy/laparoscopy
* Diagnostic laparotomy/laparoscopy where no subsequent procedure is performed (however, if no procedure is performed because of inoperable pathology, then include)
* All surgery involving the appendix or gallbladder, including any surgery relating to complications
* Non-elective hernia repair without bowel resection or division of adhesions
* Non-elective formation of colostomy or ileostomy
* Trauma surgery (blunt or penetrating), vascular surgery, obstetric/gynaecological surgery or transplant surgery
* Surgery for pathology of oesophagus, spleen, renal tract, kidneys, liver, gallbladder and biliary tree, pancreas or urinary tract


* Age\<18 years old
* Lack of patient consent to family/supporter involvement


• Consultants not done \>2 years of on-call
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bowel Research UK

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

NHS Lothian

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

NHS Grampian

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

NHS Tayside

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Glasgow

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Rachel John-Charles, MBChB, Bsc (Hons), MRSC

Role: CONTACT

07962471992

Susan Moug, MBChB, Bsc (Hons), FRSC, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PhD_23017

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

UGN23SG190

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Robotic Emergency General Surgery Program
NCT07202442 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Gut Oxygenation and Laparoscopy
NCT01040013 COMPLETED PHASE2
CPET in Colorectal Surgery
NCT02298907 COMPLETED