Esophageal Cytology With FISH in Detecting Esophageal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02100189

Last Updated: 2017-05-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical trial studies whether esophageal cytology plus fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is equal to or better than esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD) or upper endoscopy for the early detection of esophageal cancer. Genes are the units of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) the chemical structure carrying genetic information that determine many human characteristics. Certain genes in cancer cells may determine how the tumor grows or spreads and how it may respond to different drugs. Part of this study is to test those genes in esophageal cells using FISH.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Determine if sponge cytology with FISH is a reliable screening tool for esophageal dysplasia/cancer, and determine its sensitivity and specificity, compared to the gold standard procedure (upper endoscopy).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Determine if the cytology screening with FISH biomarkers is more cost effective than upper endoscopy for the screening of esophageal cancer and the surveillance of esophageal metaplasia and dysplasia.

II. Determine the limitations and future needs to improve this technique.

OUTLINE:

Participants swallow the capsule (Oesotest from Actimed) and then wait 10 minutes before the sponge is pulled out through the esophagus by gentle traction on the string. Cytology samples from the sponge are harvested and analyzed by FISH. Participants then undergo standard EGD or upper endoscopy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dysphagia Dysplasia Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Esophagitis Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease High Grade Dysplasia in Barrett Esophagus Weight Loss

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Screening (esophageal cytology, FISH)

Participants swallow the capsule (Oesotest from Actimed) and then wait 10 minutes before the sponge is pulled out through the esophagus by gentle traction on the string. Cytology samples from the sponge are harvested and analyzed by FISH. Participants then undergo standard EGD or upper endoscopy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cytology Specimen Collection Procedure

Intervention Type OTHER

Undergo esophageal cytology collection

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo standard EGD or endoscopy

Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Intervention Type OTHER

Correlative studies

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cytology Specimen Collection Procedure

Undergo esophageal cytology collection

Intervention Type OTHER

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Undergo standard EGD or endoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Correlative studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cytologic Sampling EGD

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects with known esophageal cancer diagnosed by previous endoscopy

* Adenocarcinoma
* Squamous cell carcinoma
* Patients determined to be at risk for esophageal cancer:

* Subjects with a history of Barrett's esophagus
* Subjects with a history of low or high grade dysplasia
* Subjects with a history of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
* Subjects with a history of esophagitis
* Subjects with symptoms of esophageal cancer (EC) referred for endoscopy (new onset dysphagia, weight loss, etc)
* Patients must be scheduled for a procedure capable of providing a definitive pathological diagnosis and evaluating for complications of the esophageal sponge on the same day as the study procedure, either:

* Upper endoscopy
* Surgical esophagectomy
* Subjects with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status =\< 3 (Karnofsky \>= 30%) will be included
* Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects with severe, symptomatic dysphagia (unable to pass solids)
* Subjects that are unable to swallow a tablet/pill for any reason
* Subjects with a previous esophagectomy
* Subjects with esophageal varices
* Subjects unable to provide consent
* Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

John Hunter

Interim Dean

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Hunter

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2014-00384

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

IRB00009213

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

P30CA069533

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

IRB00009213

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Esophageal Cancer Risk Registry
NCT00260585 RECRUITING
Lucid Registry Study
NCT05965999 UNKNOWN