Esophageal Cytology With FISH in Detecting Esophageal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT02100189
Last Updated: 2017-05-11
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-02-28
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Swallowable Sponge Cell Sampling Device and Next Generation Sequencing in Detecting Esophageal Cancer in Patients With Low or High Grade Dysplasia, Barrett Esophagus, or Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
NCT02890979
Minimally Invasive Molecular Approaches for the Detection of Barrett's Esophagus- High Grade Dysplasia and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
NCT07212491
A Minimally-Invasive Sponge on a String Device for Screening for Barrett's Esophagus
NCT02560623
A Study of Barrett's Esophagus Patients to Investigate Quality of Life and Fear of Cancer, and Optimize a Risk Model Based on Biomarkers and New Technologies to Better Predict the Development of Cancer
NCT06523374
Stratifying Risk in Barrett's Esophagus: A Pilot Study for Biomarker-based Patient Management
NCT02075905
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. Determine if sponge cytology with FISH is a reliable screening tool for esophageal dysplasia/cancer, and determine its sensitivity and specificity, compared to the gold standard procedure (upper endoscopy).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Determine if the cytology screening with FISH biomarkers is more cost effective than upper endoscopy for the screening of esophageal cancer and the surveillance of esophageal metaplasia and dysplasia.
II. Determine the limitations and future needs to improve this technique.
OUTLINE:
Participants swallow the capsule (Oesotest from Actimed) and then wait 10 minutes before the sponge is pulled out through the esophagus by gentle traction on the string. Cytology samples from the sponge are harvested and analyzed by FISH. Participants then undergo standard EGD or upper endoscopy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Screening (esophageal cytology, FISH)
Participants swallow the capsule (Oesotest from Actimed) and then wait 10 minutes before the sponge is pulled out through the esophagus by gentle traction on the string. Cytology samples from the sponge are harvested and analyzed by FISH. Participants then undergo standard EGD or upper endoscopy.
Cytology Specimen Collection Procedure
Undergo esophageal cytology collection
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Undergo standard EGD or endoscopy
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cytology Specimen Collection Procedure
Undergo esophageal cytology collection
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Undergo standard EGD or endoscopy
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adenocarcinoma
* Squamous cell carcinoma
* Patients determined to be at risk for esophageal cancer:
* Subjects with a history of Barrett's esophagus
* Subjects with a history of low or high grade dysplasia
* Subjects with a history of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
* Subjects with a history of esophagitis
* Subjects with symptoms of esophageal cancer (EC) referred for endoscopy (new onset dysphagia, weight loss, etc)
* Patients must be scheduled for a procedure capable of providing a definitive pathological diagnosis and evaluating for complications of the esophageal sponge on the same day as the study procedure, either:
* Upper endoscopy
* Surgical esophagectomy
* Subjects with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status =\< 3 (Karnofsky \>= 30%) will be included
* Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects that are unable to swallow a tablet/pill for any reason
* Subjects with a previous esophagectomy
* Subjects with esophageal varices
* Subjects unable to provide consent
* Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
John Hunter
Interim Dean
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John Hunter
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
Portland, Oregon, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2014-00384
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IRB00009213
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IRB00009213
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.