Efficacy of EsoGuard on Samples Collected Using EsoCheck Versus EGD for the Diagnosis of BE

NCT ID: NCT04293458

Last Updated: 2023-01-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

145 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-28

Study Completion Date

2022-08-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study will assess the performance of the combined system, i.e., the use of the EsoGuard assay on cells collected using the EsoCheck 510(k) cleared device, to detect Barrett's Esophagus, with and without dysplasia, and/or Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, in individuals deemed to be at high risk for these conditions (i.e., screening) per ACG guidelines.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a multicenter, single-arm study designed to assess the operating characteristics of the EsoGuard diagnostic assay performed on distal esophageal mucosal cells collected using the EsoCheck cell collection device, compared to the gold standard, for the screening of BE with and without dysplasia and for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), in patients at high risk for BE and for whom a screening EGD is indicated according to ACG-established criteria.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Barrett Esophagus Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Barretts Esophagus With Dysplasia Barrett's Esophagus Without Dysplasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Multicenter, Single Arm
Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EsoCheck vs. EGD with or without biopsies

All subjects will undergo both the EsoCheck (non-invasive esophageal cell sample collection) followed by EGD (with or without biopsies)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

EsoGuard

Intervention Type DEVICE

EsoGuard assay (LDT) will be used on cells collected using EsoCheck (510K cleared esophageal cell collection device) and compared to results of EGD plus biopsies (when taken)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EsoGuard

EsoGuard assay (LDT) will be used on cells collected using EsoCheck (510K cleared esophageal cell collection device) and compared to results of EGD plus biopsies (when taken)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Men aged 50 years old and older
2. ≥5 years either of

* GERD symptoms,
* GERD treated with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy (whether symptom control is achieved or not), or,
* any combination of treated and untreated periods, as long the cumulative total is at least 5 years
3. No solid foods eaten for at least 2 hours prior to EsoCheck procedure
4. One or more of the following risk factors:

1. Caucasian race
2. Current or past history of cigarette smoking
3. BMI of at least 30 kg/m2
4. First-degree relative with BE or EAC

\-

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of prior EGD procedure
2. Inability to provide written informed consent
3. On anti-coagulant drug(s) that cannot be temporarily discontinued
4. Known history of esophageal varices or esophageal stricture
5. Any contraindication, as deemed in Investigator's medical judgment, to undergoing the EsoCheck procedure, undergoing the EGD procedure, and/or having biopsies taken, including but not limited to due to comorbidities such as coagulopathy or a known history of esophageal diverticula, esophageal fistula and/or esophageal ulceration
6. History of difficulty swallowing (dysphagia) or painful swallowing (odynophagia), including swallowing pills
7. Oropharyngeal tumor
8. History of esophageal or gastric surgery, with exception of uncomplicated surgical fundoplication procedure
9. History of myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accident within past 6 months
10. History of esophageal motility disorder
11. Currently implanted Linx device
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lucid Diagnostics, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michelle McDermott

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Lucid Diagnostics

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Lucid Investigative Site

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Naples, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Rockford, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Wyoming, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Flowood, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Valladolid, , Spain

Site Status

Lucid Investigative Site

Zaragoza, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PR-0139 / EG-CL-101

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Enhancing Screening Practices for BE
NCT07335445 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA