Clinical Utility of a Non Endoscopic Device EsoCheck and Biomarker EsoGuard as Alternative to Endoscopy for Screening for Barrett's Esophagus in At Risk Population
NCT ID: NCT05778851
Last Updated: 2025-10-30
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
97 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-04-12
2024-08-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The participants will complete two rounds of questions concerning the assessed risk for BE and decision for endoscopy referral of 6 patient cases (clinical vignettes).
After the first round has been completed, an EsoCheck/EsoGuard educational information package and the second round of 6 clinical vignettes including EsoGuard results will be sent.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of EsoGuard on Samples Collected Using EsoCheck Versus EGD for the Diagnosis of BE
NCT04293458
Efficacy of EsoGuard Assay on Esophageal Surface Cells Collected With EsoCheck vs EGD for the Diagnosis of BE or EAC
NCT04295811
Lucid Registry Study
NCT05965999
Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Collection Device for Molecular Analysis of Esophageal Samples
NCT06071845
Minimally Invasive Molecular Approaches for the Detection of Barrett's Esophagus- High Grade Dysplasia and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
NCT07212491
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Around 200 US physicians will be asked to participate in this study and at least 100 will be enrolled. Physicians eligible for participation are those whose scope of practice includes preventative care and disease screening - namely screening of BE, such as primary care physicians, family medicine physicians, and general practitioners; physicians whose scope of practice include diagnosis and management of esophageal disease may also participate.
The participants will complete two rounds of questions concerning the assessed risk for BE and decision for endoscopy referral of 6 patient cases (clinical vignettes). Per round, there will be 3 different questionnaires consisting of 6 clinical vignettes (A/B/C). Participants will be randomized to questionnaire A, B or C according to the randomization scheme. After the first round has been completed, an EsoCheck/EsoGuard educational information package and the second round of 6 clinical vignettes including EsoGuard results will be sent.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
SCREENING
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
Virtual patient cases with GERD and similar BE risk factors as the cases in intervention but without an EsoGuard result and in a different order.
No interventions assigned to this group
Intervention
Virtual patient cases with GERD and similar BE risk factors as the cases in the control arm with an EsoGuard result.
EsoGuard result
Education slide-set EsoGuard and patient cases including EsoGuard result
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EsoGuard result
Education slide-set EsoGuard and patient cases including EsoGuard result
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Have between 1 to 40 years of post-residency clinical experience within their field of practice;
3. Have an active panel (whether as part of a group practice, or individually) of over 1000 patients with an adult patient load of more than 50%.
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medex15
INDUSTRY
Lucid Diagnostics, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Victoria T Lee, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lucid Diagnostics
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lucid Diagnostics
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ASBE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.