A Study Comparing Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

NCT ID: NCT02076009

Last Updated: 2025-05-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

569 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-07-23

Study Completion Date

2024-11-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of daratumumab when combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) to that of lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd), in terms of progression-free survival in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized (participants will be assigned by chance to study treatments), open-label (all participants and study personnel will know the identity of the study treatments), active-controlled (none of the study treatments are placebo), parallel-group (both treatment arms will run at the same time), multicenter study. In this study, daratumumab, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone (DRd) will be compared with lenalidomide and low dose dexamethasone (Rd) in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either DRd or Rd. The study will include a Screening Phase, a Treatment Phase (involving treatment cycles of approximately 28 days in length), and a Follow-up Phase. The Treatment Phase will extend from the administration of the first dose of study medication until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants will also discontinue study treatment if: they become pregnant; have their dose held for more than 28 days (or if 3 consecutive planned doses of daratumumab are missed for reasons other than toxicity); or for safety reasons (for example, adverse event). The Follow-up Phase will begin at the end of treatment and will continue until death, loss to follow-up, consent withdrawal for study participation, or the final overall survival (OS) analysis, whichever occurs first. Eligible participants from Rd group who have had sponsor confirmed disease progression will be offered the option for treatment with daratumumab monotherapy (of 28 days cycle). The primary endpoint will be progression-free survival (PFS). Analysis of the primary endpoint was performed at a pre-specified point determined by PFS events with a clinical cutoff of March 7, 2016 when 169 events of death or progression had occurred. The end of study is anticipated at approximately 6 years after the last participant is randomized. Blood and urine samples will be obtained at time points during the study, together with bone marrow aspirates/biopsies and skeletal surveys. Participant safety will be assessed throughout the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Myeloma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Daratumumab + lenalidomide + dexamethasone

During each 28-day treatment cycle, participants will receive daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Daratumumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Daratumumab 16mg/kg will be administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion (into the vein) as per the following schedule: once a week during treatment cycles 1 and 2; every 2 weeks during treatment cycles 3 to 6; and every 4 weeks for cycles 7 and onwards. Following amendment 8, participants receiving daratumumab IV have the option to switch to daratumumab subcutaneous (SC) 1800 mg/dose until documented progression, unacceptable toxicity, or the end of study on Day 1 of any cycle, at the discretion of the investigator.

Lenalidomide

Intervention Type DRUG

Lenalidomide will be administered at a dose of 25 mg orally (by mouth) on Days 1 through 21 of each treatment cycle.

Dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone (or equivalent in accordance with local standards) will be administered as a total dose of 40 mg weekly (or 20 mg weekly for participants \> 75 years old or with a body mass index \< 18.5).

Lenalidomide + dexamethasone

During each 28-day treatment cycle, participants will receive lenalidomide and dexamethasone.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lenalidomide

Intervention Type DRUG

Lenalidomide will be administered at a dose of 25 mg orally (by mouth) on Days 1 through 21 of each treatment cycle.

Dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone (or equivalent in accordance with local standards) will be administered as a total dose of 40 mg weekly (or 20 mg weekly for participants \> 75 years old or with a body mass index \< 18.5).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Daratumumab

Daratumumab 16mg/kg will be administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion (into the vein) as per the following schedule: once a week during treatment cycles 1 and 2; every 2 weeks during treatment cycles 3 to 6; and every 4 weeks for cycles 7 and onwards. Following amendment 8, participants receiving daratumumab IV have the option to switch to daratumumab subcutaneous (SC) 1800 mg/dose until documented progression, unacceptable toxicity, or the end of study on Day 1 of any cycle, at the discretion of the investigator.

Intervention Type DRUG

Lenalidomide

Lenalidomide will be administered at a dose of 25 mg orally (by mouth) on Days 1 through 21 of each treatment cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone

Dexamethasone (or equivalent in accordance with local standards) will be administered as a total dose of 40 mg weekly (or 20 mg weekly for participants \> 75 years old or with a body mass index \< 18.5).

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Must have documented multiple myeloma and measurable disease
* Must have received at least 1 prior line of therapy for multiple myeloma and achieved a response (partial response or better) to at least one prior regimen
* Must have documented evidence of progressive disease as defined by the International Myeloma Working Group criteria on or after their last regimen
* Must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of 0, 1, or 2
* If a participant has received subsequent anticancer therapy (salvage therapy), the participant must have a "wash-out period" defined as 2 weeks or 5 pharmacokinetic half-lives of the treatment, whichever is longer, before the planned start date of daratumumab monotherapy. The only exception is the emergency use of a short course of corticosteroids (equivalent of dexamethasone 40 milligram per day for a maximum of 4 days) before Daratumumab monotherapy

Exclusion Criteria

* Has received any of the following therapies: daratumumab or other anti-CD38 therapies
* Has received anti-myeloma treatment within 2 weeks or 5 pharmacokinetic half-lives of the treatment
* Disease shows evidence of refractoriness or intolerance to lenalidomide or if previously treated with a lenalidomide-containing regimen the participant is excluded if he or she discontinued due to any adverse event related to prior lenalidomide treatment
* Has received autologous stem cell transplantation within 12 weeks before the date of randomization, or previously received an allogenic stem cell transplant (regardless of timing), or planning to undergo a stem cell transplant prior to progression of disease
* History of malignancy (other than multiple myeloma) within 5 years before the first dose of daratumumab monotherapy (exceptions are squamous and basal cell carcinomas of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or breast, or other non-invasive lesion, that in the opinion of the investigator, with concurrence with the sponsor's medical monitor, is considered cured with minimal risk of recurrence within 5 years)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Columbia, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fairfax, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Camperdown, , Australia

Site Status

Geelong, , Australia

Site Status

Heidelberg, , Australia

Site Status

Malvern, , Australia

Site Status

South Brisbane, , Australia

Site Status

Southport, , Australia

Site Status

Anderlecht, , Belgium

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Vejle, , Denmark

Site Status

Argenteuil, , France

Site Status

Caen, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Tours, , France

Site Status

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hamm, , Germany

Site Status

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Karlsruhe, , Germany

Site Status

Koblenz, , Germany

Site Status

Saarbrücken, , Germany

Site Status

Villingen-Schwenningen, , Germany

Site Status

Athens Attica, , Greece

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Nahariya, , Israel

Site Status

Netanya, , Israel

Site Status

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Hitachi, , Japan

Site Status

Kanazawa, , Japan

Site Status

Kobe, , Japan

Site Status

Kurume, , Japan

Site Status

Matsuyama, , Japan

Site Status

Nagoya, , Japan

Site Status

Narita, , Japan

Site Status

Ohgaki, , Japan

Site Status

Okayama, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Sendai, , Japan

Site Status

Shibukawa, , Japan

Site Status

Shibuya City, , Japan

Site Status

Tachikawa, , Japan

Site Status

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Zwolle, , Netherlands

Site Status

Brzozów, , Poland

Site Status

Chorzów, , Poland

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Legnica, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Słupsk, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclawa, , Poland

Site Status

Dzerzhinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Petrozavodsk, , Russia

Site Status

Ryazan, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Samara, , Russia

Site Status

Syktyvkar, , Russia

Site Status

Yekaterinburg, , Russia

Site Status

Gyeonggi-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Badalona, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

La Laguna (Santa Cruz de Tenerife), , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Pamplona, , Spain

Site Status

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Falun, , Sweden

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Helsingborg, , Sweden

Site Status

Huddinge, , Sweden

Site Status

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Changhua, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Southampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Surrey, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Wolverhampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium Canada Denmark France Germany Greece Israel Japan Netherlands Poland Russia South Korea Spain Sweden Taiwan United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Almansour SA, Alqudah MAY, Abuhelwa Z, Al-Shamsi HO, Alhuraiji A, Semreen MH, Bustanji Y, Alzoubi KH, Modi ND, Mckinnon RA, Sorich MJ, Hopkins AM, Abuhelwa AY. Antithrombotic utilization, adverse events, and associations with treatment outcomes in multiple myeloma: pooled analysis of three clinical trials. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024 Sep 2;16:17588359241275387. doi: 10.1177/17588359241275387. eCollection 2024.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39229471 (View on PubMed)

Spencer A, Moreau P, Mateos MV, Goldschmidt H, Suzuki K, Levin MD, Sonneveld P, Orlowski RZ, Yoon SS, Usmani SZ, Weisel K, Reece D, Ahmadi T, Pei H, Mayo WG, Gai X, Carey J, Bartlett JB, Carson R, Dimopoulos MA. Daratumumab for patients with myeloma with early or late relapse after initial therapy: subgroup analysis of CASTOR and POLLUX. Blood Adv. 2024 Jan 23;8(2):388-398. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010579.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38048391 (View on PubMed)

Dimopoulos MA, Oriol A, Nahi H, San-Miguel J, Bahlis NJ, Usmani SZ, Rabin N, Orlowski RZ, Suzuki K, Plesner T, Yoon SS, Ben Yehuda D, Richardson PG, Goldschmidt H, Reece D, Ahmadi T, Qin X, Garvin Mayo W, Gai X, Carey J, Carson R, Moreau P. Overall Survival With Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma (POLLUX): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Mar 10;41(8):1590-1599. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00940. Epub 2023 Jan 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36599114 (View on PubMed)

Cavo M, San-Miguel J, Usmani SZ, Weisel K, Dimopoulos MA, Avet-Loiseau H, Paiva B, Bahlis NJ, Plesner T, Hungria V, Moreau P, Mateos MV, Perrot A, Iida S, Facon T, Kumar S, van de Donk NWCJ, Sonneveld P, Spencer A, Krevvata M, Heuck C, Wang J, Ukropec J, Kobos R, Sun S, Qi M, Munshi N. Prognostic value of minimal residual disease negativity in myeloma: combined analysis of POLLUX, CASTOR, ALCYONE, and MAIA. Blood. 2022 Feb 10;139(6):835-844. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021011101.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34289038 (View on PubMed)

Plesner T, Dimopoulos MA, Oriol A, San-Miguel J, Bahlis NJ, Rabin N, Suzuki K, Yoon SS, Ben-Yehuda D, Cook G, Goldschmidt H, Grosicki S, Qin X, Fastenau J, Garvin W, Carson R, Renaud T, Gries KS. Health-related quality of life in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: treatment with daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in the phase 3 POLLUX trial. Br J Haematol. 2021 Jul;194(1):132-139. doi: 10.1111/bjh.17435. Epub 2021 Apr 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33822368 (View on PubMed)

Avet-Loiseau H, San-Miguel J, Casneuf T, Iida S, Lonial S, Usmani SZ, Spencer A, Moreau P, Plesner T, Weisel K, Ukropec J, Chiu C, Trivedi S, Amin H, Krevvata M, Ramaswami P, Qin X, Qi M, Sun S, Qi M, Kobos R, Bahlis NJ. Evaluation of Sustained Minimal Residual Disease Negativity With Daratumumab-Combination Regimens in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Analysis of POLLUX and CASTOR. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;39(10):1139-1149. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01814. Epub 2021 Jan 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33513030 (View on PubMed)

Mateos MV, Spencer A, Nooka AK, Pour L, Weisel K, Cavo M, Laubach JP, Cook G, Iida S, Benboubker L, Usmani SZ, Yoon SS, Bahlis NJ, Chiu C, Ukropec J, Schecter JM, Qin X, O'Rourke L, Dimopoulos MA. Daratumumab-based regimens are highly effective and well tolerated in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma regardless of patient age: subgroup analysis of the phase 3 CASTOR and POLLUX studies. Haematologica. 2020 Jan 31;105(2):468-477. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2019.217448. Print 2020.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31221782 (View on PubMed)

Dimopoulos MA, Oriol A, Nahi H, San-Miguel J, Bahlis NJ, Usmani SZ, Rabin N, Orlowski RZ, Komarnicki M, Suzuki K, Plesner T, Yoon SS, Ben Yehuda D, Richardson PG, Goldschmidt H, Reece D, Lisby S, Khokhar NZ, O'Rourke L, Chiu C, Qin X, Guckert M, Ahmadi T, Moreau P; POLLUX Investigators. Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 6;375(14):1319-1331. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607751.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27705267 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

54767414MMY3003

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2013-005525-23

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR103663

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.