Compare Lenalidomide and Subcutaneous Daratumumab vs Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Frail Subjects With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Who Are Ineligible for High Dose Therapy

NCT ID: NCT03993912

Last Updated: 2025-09-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

294 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-17

Study Completion Date

2027-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a Phase 3, randomized (study drug assigned by chance), open-label (participants and researchers are aware about the treatment, participants are receiving), active-controlled (study in which the experimental treatment or procedure is compared to a standard treatment or procedure), parallel-group (each group of participants will be treated at the same time), and multicenter (when more than one hospital team work on a medical research study) study in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (a blood cancer of plasma cells) and who are not candidates for high dose chemotherapy (treatment of disease, usually cancer, by chemical agents) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). The primary hypothesis of this study is that subcutaneous Daratumumab in combination with Lenalidomide will prolong progression-free survival and likely induce less toxicity as compared with Lenalidomide and dexamethasone, in elderly frail subjects with newly diagnosed Multiple myeloma who are ineligible for high dose chemotherapy and ASCT

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary hypothesis of this study is that subcutaneous Daratumumab in combination with Lenalidomide will prolong progression-free survival and likely induce less toxicity as compared with Lenalidomide and dexamethasone, in elderly frail subjects with newly diagnosed Multiple myeloma who are ineligible for high dose chemotherapy and ASCT

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Myeloma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1: Experimental group

Daratumumab SC 1800 mg

* once every week for 8 weeks
* then once every other week for 16 weeks
* thereafter once every 4 weeks, until progression Lenalidomide PO (25mg): days 1 through 21 of each 28-day cycle, until progression Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of a 28-day cycle, for the first 2 cycles, then discontinued

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Daratumumab SC in combination with Lenalidomide

Intervention Type DRUG

Daratumumab SC 1800 mg

* once every week for 8 weeks
* then once every other week for 16 weeks
* thereafter once every 4 weeks, until progression

Lenalidomide PO (25mg)

Intervention Type DRUG

Lenalidomide PO (25mg): days 1 through 21 of each 28-day cycle, until progression

Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progression

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progression

Arm 2: Control group

Lenalidomide PO (25mg): days 1 through 21 of each 28-day cycle, until progression Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progression

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Lenalidomide PO (25mg)

Intervention Type DRUG

Lenalidomide PO (25mg): days 1 through 21 of each 28-day cycle, until progression

Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progression

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progression

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Daratumumab SC in combination with Lenalidomide

Daratumumab SC 1800 mg

* once every week for 8 weeks
* then once every other week for 16 weeks
* thereafter once every 4 weeks, until progression

Intervention Type DRUG

Lenalidomide PO (25mg)

Lenalidomide PO (25mg): days 1 through 21 of each 28-day cycle, until progression

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progression

Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progression

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Subject must be at least 65 years of age.
2. Subject must have documented multiple myeloma satisfying the CRAB criteria and measurable disease.
3. Newly diagnosed and not considered candidate for high-dose chemotherapy with SCT.
4. Subject must have a Frailty Score ≥ 2
5. Subject must have within 5 days prior to first drug intake (C1D1) pretreatment clinical laboratory values meeting the following criteria during the Screening Phase:

* hemoglobin ≥7.5 g/dL
* absolute neutrophil count ≥1.0 x 109/L
* platelet count ≥70 x 109/L
* aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
* alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤2.5 x ULN
* total bilirubin ≤2.0 x ULN
* creatinine clearance≥30mL/min
6. Measurable ISS with β2-microglobulin and albumin values for randomization
7. A man who is sexually active with a woman of childbearing potential must agree to use a latex or synthetic condom, even if they had a successful vasectomy. All men must also not donate sperm during the study, for 4 weeks after the last dose of lenalidomide, and for 4 months after the last dose of daratumumab. Women participating in this study must be postmenopausal.
8. Each subject must sign an informed consent form (ICF) indicating that he or she understands the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study. Subject must be willing and able to adhere to the prohibitions and restrictions specified in this protocol, as referenced in the ICF.
9. Subjects affiliated with an appropriate social security system.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subject has a diagnosis of primary amyloidosis, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, or smoldering multiple myeloma.
2. Subject has a diagnosis of Waldenström's disease, or other conditions in which IgM M-protein is present in the absence of a clonal plasma cell infiltration with lytic bone lesions.
3. Subject has prior or current systemic therapy or SCT for multiple myeloma
4. Subject has a history of malignancy (other than multiple myeloma) within 5 years before the date of randomization
5. Subject has had radiation therapy within 14 days of randomization.
6. Subject has had plasmapheresis within 28 days of randomization.
7. Subject is exhibiting clinical signs of meningeal involvement of multiple myeloma.
8. Subject has known chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (defined as a forced expiratory volume \[FEV\] in 1 second \<60% of predicted normal), persistent asthma, or a history of asthma within the last 2 years (intermittent asthma is allowed).
9. Subject is known to be seropositive for history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
10. Seropositive for hepatitis B.
11. (Known to be) seropositive for hepatitis C
12. Subject has any concurrent medical or psychiatric condition or disease that is likely to interfere with the study procedures or results, or that in the opinion of the investigator, would constitute a hazard for participating in this study.
13. Subject has clinically significant cardiac disease, including:

* myocardial infarction within 1 year before randomization, or an unstable or uncontrolled disease/condition related to or affecting cardiac function
* uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia or clinically significant ECG abnormalities
* screening 12-lead ECG showing a baseline QT interval as corrected by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) \>470 msec
14. Subject has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to corticosteroids, monoclonal antibodies or human proteins, or their excipients
15. Subject has plasma cell leukemia or POEMS syndrome
16. Subject is known or suspected of not being able to comply with the study protocol. Subject has any condition for which, in the opinion of the investigator, participation would not be in the best interest of the subject or that could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments.
17. Subject has had major surgery within 2 weeks before randomization or has not fully recovered from surgery.
18. Subject has received an investigational drug (including investigational vaccines) or used an invasive investigational medical device within 4 weeks before randomization or is currently enrolled in an interventional investigational study.
19. Refusal to consent or protected by legal regime ( guardianship, trusteeship)
20. Subject has contraindications to required prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
21. Incidence of gastrointestinal disease that may significantly alter the absorption of oral drugs.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Lille

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thierry Facon, MD,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Lille

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chru Jean Minjoz

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Ch Blois Simone Veil

Blois, , France

Site Status

Ch Fleyriat

Bourg-en-Bresse, , France

Site Status

Chru Brest Site Hopital Morvan

Brest, , France

Site Status

Chu de Caen Normandie

Caen, , France

Site Status

Hopital Prive Sevigne - Cesson

Cesson-Sévigné, , France

Site Status

Chu Dijon Bourgogne

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Chu de Grenoble

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Gpe Hospitalier La Rochelle-Re-Aunis

La Rochelle, , France

Site Status

Ch Chartres Louis Pasteur-Le Coudray

Le Coudray, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Claude Huriez, CHU

Lille, , France

Site Status

Institut Paoli Calmettes

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Chi Mont de Marsan Et Pays Des Sources

Mont-de-Marsan, , France

Site Status

Chu Montpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Chu de Nantes Site Hotel Dieu Hme

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Chu de Nice Hopital de L'Archet

Nice, , France

Site Status

Hopital Haut-Leveque - Chu

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de Perigueux

Périgueux, , France

Site Status

Chru Rennes Site Pontchaillou

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de Saint Quentin

Saint-Quentin, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Saint-Malo

St-Malo, , France

Site Status

Oncopole Chu Toulouse

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Chu de Tours

Tours, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Manier S, Lambert J, Hulin C, Macro M, Laribi K, Araujo C, Pica GM, Touzeau C, Godmer P, Slama B, Karlin L, Orsini Piocelle F, Dib M, Sanhes L, Morel P, El Yamani A, Tiab M, Tabrizi R, Richez V, Garderet L, Royer B, Bareau B, Mariette C, Fleck E, Robu D, Calmettes C, Rigaudeau S, Demarquette H, Frenzel L, Decaux O, Mohty M, Arnulf B, Bigot N, Perrot A, Corre J, Mary JY, Avet-Loiseau H, Moreau P, Leleu X, Facon T. Safety and efficacy of a dexamethasone-sparing regimen with daratumumab and lenalidomide in patients with frailty and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (IFM2017-03): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2025 Oct;26(10):1323-1333. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00280-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 41038184 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-003535-30

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2018_16

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.