Study Comparing Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Participants With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma

NCT ID: NCT02252172

Last Updated: 2025-10-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

737 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-16

Study Completion Date

2024-10-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of daratumumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone to that of lenalidomide and dexamethasone in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (a blood cancer of plasma cells) who are not candidates for high dose chemotherapy (treatment of disease, usually cancer, by chemical agents) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a Phase 3, randomized (study drug assigned by chance), open-label (participants and researchers are aware about the treatment, participants are receiving), active-controlled (study in which the experimental treatment or procedure is compared to a standard treatment or procedure), parallel-group (each group of participants will be treated at the same time), and multicenter (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study) study in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and who are not candidates for high dose chemotherapy and ASCT. All the eligible participants will be randomly assigned to receive either lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) (Arm A) or daratumumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) (Arm B). Daratumumab (16 milligram per kilogram \[mg/kg\]) will be administered weekly for first 8 weeks (Cycles 1 to 2) of treatment and then every other week for 16 weeks (Cycles 3 to 6), then every 4 weeks (from Cycle 7 and beyond) until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity. Lenalidomide will be administered at a dose of 25 mg orally on Days 1 through 21 of each 28-day cycle, and dexamethasone will be administered at a dose of 40 mg once a week for both treatment arms. Participants in both treatment arms will continue lenalidomide and dexamethasone until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. All participants randomized to Treatment Arm B (DRd) in this study initially received daratumumab IV formulation; however, following implementation of protocol amendment 8, participants still receiving treatment with daratumumab IV will have the option to switch to daratumumab SC on Day 1 of any cycle, at the discretion of the investigator. Daratumumab subcutaneous (SC) will be administered by SC injection at a fixed dose of 1800 mg once every 4 weeks until documented progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study completion. Participants in Arm A who have sponsor-confirmed disease progression may have the option to receive daratumumab provided by the sponsor (in any subsequent line of therapy) in the Follow-up phase. The study consists of 3 phases: Screening Phase (within 21 days prior to the first dose administration on Day 1), Treatment Phase (Day 1 up to discontinuation of all study treatment), and Follow-up Phase (from discontinuation of all study treatment up to death, lost to follow up, consent withdrawal, or study end, whichever occurs first). The maximum duration of study will be 7 years after last participant is randomized. Efficacy will primarily be evaluated by PFS. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Myeloma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd)

Participants will receive Lenalidomide 25 mg capsule orally on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle, Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or intravenously once a week. Study treatment continues until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or end of study (maximum up to 7 years after last subject is randomized) whichever comes first.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Daratumumab IV

Intervention Type DRUG

Daratumumab will be administered at a dose of 16 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) by intravenous (IV) infusion, once a week for 8 weeks, then once every other week for 16 weeks, thereafter once every 4 weeks until documented progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or end of study (maximum up to 7 years).

Lenalidomide

Intervention Type DRUG

Lenalidomide 25 mg capsule orally on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle.

Dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or intravenously once in a week.

Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)

Participants will receive Daratumumab 16 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) by intravenous infusion, once a week for 8 weeks, then once every other week for 16 weeks, thereafter once every 4 weeks, Lenalidomide 25 mg capsule orally on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle, Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or intravenously once a week. Following implementation of protocol amendment 8, participants still receiving treatment with daratumumab IV will have the option to switch to daratumumab SC on Day 1 of any cycle, at the discretion of the investigator. Daratumumab subcutaneous (SC) will be administered by SC injection at a fixed dose of 1800 mg once every 4 weeks until documented progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study completion. Study treatment continues until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or end of study (maximum up to 7 years after last subject is randomized) whichever comes first.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lenalidomide

Intervention Type DRUG

Lenalidomide 25 mg capsule orally on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle.

Dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or intravenously once in a week.

Daratumumab SC

Intervention Type DRUG

Daratumumab SC will be administered by SC injection at a fixed dose of 1800 mg once every 4 weeks until documented progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end. Following implementation of protocol amendment 8, participants still receiving treatment with daratumumab IV will have the option to switch to daratumumab SC on Day 1 of any cycle, at the discretion of the investigator.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Daratumumab IV

Daratumumab will be administered at a dose of 16 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) by intravenous (IV) infusion, once a week for 8 weeks, then once every other week for 16 weeks, thereafter once every 4 weeks until documented progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or end of study (maximum up to 7 years).

Intervention Type DRUG

Lenalidomide

Lenalidomide 25 mg capsule orally on Day 1 through Day 21 of each 28-day cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone

Dexamethasone 40 mg orally or intravenously once in a week.

Intervention Type DRUG

Daratumumab SC

Daratumumab SC will be administered by SC injection at a fixed dose of 1800 mg once every 4 weeks until documented progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end. Following implementation of protocol amendment 8, participants still receiving treatment with daratumumab IV will have the option to switch to daratumumab SC on Day 1 of any cycle, at the discretion of the investigator.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

JNJ-54767414 JNJ-54767414

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participant must have documented multiple myeloma satisfying the CRAB (calcium elevation, renal insufficiency, anemia and bone abnormalities) criteria, monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow greater than or equal to (\>=) 10 percent (%) or presence of a biopsy proven plasmacytoma and measurable disease as defined by any of the following: (a) immunoglobulin (Ig) G myeloma (serum monoclonal paraprotein \[M-protein\] level \>=1.0 gram/deciliter \[g/dL\] or urine M-protein level \>=200 milligram\[mg\]/24 hours\[hrs\]; or (b) IgA, IgM, IgD, or IgE multiple myeloma (serum M-protein level \>=0.5 g/dL or urine M-protein level \>=200 mg/24 hrs); or (c) light chain multiple myeloma without measurable disease in serum or urine (serum immunoglobulin free light chain \>=10 mg/dL and abnormal serum immunoglobulin kappa lambda free light chain ratio)
* Participant must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0, 1, or 2
* Participants who are newly diagnosed and not considered for high-dose chemotherapy due to: being age \>=65 years; or participants less than (\<) 65 years with presence of important comorbid condition(s) likely to have a negative impact on tolerability of high dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation. Sponsor review and approval of participants below 65 years of age is required before randomization
* Women of childbearing potential must commit to either abstain continuously from sexual intercourse or to use 2 methods of reliable birth control simultaneously as deemed appropriate by the Investigator. Contraception must begin 4 weeks prior to dosing and must continue for 3 months after the last dose of daratumumab
* Man, who is sexually active with a woman of child-bearing potential must agree to use a latex or synthetic condom, even if he had a successful vasectomy, must agree to use an adequate contraception method as deemed appropriate by the Investigator, and must also agree to not donate sperm during the study and for 4 weeks after last dose of lenalidomide and 4 months after last dose of daratumumab

Exclusion Criteria

* Participant has a diagnosis of primary amyloidosis, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (presence of serum M-protein \<3 g/dL; absence of lytic bone lesions, anemia, hypercalcemia, and renal insufficiency related to the M-protein), or smoldering multiple myeloma (asymptomatic multiple myeloma with absence of related organ or tissue impairment end organ damage)
* Participant has a diagnosis of Waldenström's disease, or other conditions in which IgM M protein is present in the absence of a clonal plasma cell infiltration with lytic bone lesions
* Participant has a history of malignancy (other than multiple myeloma) within 5 years before the date of randomization (exceptions are squamous and basal cell carcinomas of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or malignancy that in the opinion of the Investigator, with concurrence with the Sponsor's medical monitor, is considered cured with minimal risk of recurrence within 5 years)
* Participant has prior or current systemic therapy or SCT for multiple myeloma, with the exception of an emergency use of a short course (equivalent of dexamethasone 40 mg/day for 4 days) of corticosteroids before treatment
* Participant has had radiation therapy within 14 days of randomization
* Participant has known chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (defined as a forced expiratory volume in 1 second \[FEV1\] \<50% of predicted normal), persistent asthma, or a history of asthma within the last 2 years (controlled intermittent asthma or controlled mild persistent asthma is allowed)
* Participants with known or suspected COPD must have a FEV1 test during Screening
* Participant is known to be seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis B (defined by a positive test for hepatitis B surface antigen \[HBsAg\] or antibodies to hepatitis B surface and core antigens \[anti-HBs and anti-HBc, respectively\]) or hepatitis C (anti-HCV antibody positive or HCV-ribonucleic acid \[RNA\] quantitation positive)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Glendale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Berkeley, California, United States

Site Status

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

El Cajon, California, United States

Site Status

Greenbrae, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Oceanside, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

West Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Whittier, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Fort Collins, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Glenwood Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Norwalk, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Boca Raton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lake City, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Weston, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Niles, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Lafayette, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Marrero, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Annapolis, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Frederick, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Hooksett, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Brick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Livingston, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Plainfield, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Summit, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Mineola, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Asheboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Pinehurst, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Bend, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Edinburg, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Ogden, Utah, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Box Hill, , Australia

Site Status

Fitzroy, , Australia

Site Status

Footscray, , Australia

Site Status

Kogarah, , Australia

Site Status

Kurralta Park, , Australia

Site Status

Nedlands, , Australia

Site Status

New South Wales, , Australia

Site Status

Woodville, , Australia

Site Status

Woolloongabba, , Australia

Site Status

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Wien Wien, , Austria

Site Status

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Haine Saint Paul La Louviere, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Nova Scotia, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

N/a N/a, , Canada

Site Status

Aarhus C, , Denmark

Site Status

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Vejle, , Denmark

Site Status

Amiens N/a Picardie, , France

Site Status

Angers, , France

Site Status

Bayonne, , France

Site Status

Bretagne, , France

Site Status

Caen, , France

Site Status

Cergy-Pontoise, , France

Site Status

Chalon-sur-Saône, , France

Site Status

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Dunkirk, , France

Site Status

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

La Roche-sur-Yon, , France

Site Status

Le Chesnay, , France

Site Status

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Metz-Tessy, , France

Site Status

Montivilliers, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Mulhouse, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Perpignan, , France

Site Status

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Périgueux, , France

Site Status

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Reims, , France

Site Status

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Saint-Brieuc, , France

Site Status

Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, , France

Site Status

Saint-Quentin, , France

Site Status

St-Malo, , France

Site Status

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Tours, , France

Site Status

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Aschaffenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Bad Berka, , Germany

Site Status

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Braunschweig, , Germany

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Hessen, , Germany

Site Status

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Koblenz, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Rostock, , Germany

Site Status

Schwerin, , Germany

Site Status

Stuttgart, , Germany

Site Status

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Villingen-Schwenningen, , Germany

Site Status

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Galway, , Ireland

Site Status

Hadera, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Nahariya, , Israel

Site Status

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Hilversum, , Netherlands

Site Status

Hoofddorp, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Tilburg, , Netherlands

Site Status

Falun, , Sweden

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Halmstad, , Sweden

Site Status

Helsingborg, , Sweden

Site Status

Huddinge, , Sweden

Site Status

Luleå, , Sweden

Site Status

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Aberdeen, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Canterbury, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Dundee, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Plymouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Southampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Truro, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Wolverhampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Belgium Canada Denmark France Germany Ireland Israel Netherlands Sweden United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Perrot A, Facon T, Plesner T, Usmani SZ, Kumar S, Bahlis NJ, Hulin C, Orlowski RZ, Nahi H, Mollee P, Ramasamy K, Roussel M, Jaccard A, Delforge M, Karlin L, Arnulf B, Chari A, Wang G, Gupta-Werner N, Kaila S, Pei H, Matt K, Gries KS, Carson R, Borgsten F, Weisel K. Sustained Improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life in Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Treated With Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone: MAIA Final Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes. Eur J Haematol. 2025 May;114(5):883-889. doi: 10.1111/ejh.14392. Epub 2025 Feb 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39952901 (View on PubMed)

Moreau P, Facon T, Usmani SZ, Bahlis N, Raje N, Plesner T, Orlowski RZ, Basu S, Nahi H, Hulin C, Quach H, Goldschmidt H, O'Dwyer M, Perrot A, Venner CP, Weisel K, Tiab M, Macro M, Frenzel L, Leleu X, Wang G, Pei H, Krevvata M, Carson R, Borgsten F, Kumar SK. Daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone in untreated multiple myeloma: analysis of key subgroups of the MAIA study. Leukemia. 2025 Mar;39(3):710-719. doi: 10.1038/s41375-024-02506-1. Epub 2025 Jan 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39815052 (View on PubMed)

Almansour SA, Alqudah MAY, Abuhelwa Z, Al-Shamsi HO, Alhuraiji A, Semreen MH, Bustanji Y, Alzoubi KH, Modi ND, Mckinnon RA, Sorich MJ, Hopkins AM, Abuhelwa AY. Antithrombotic utilization, adverse events, and associations with treatment outcomes in multiple myeloma: pooled analysis of three clinical trials. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024 Sep 2;16:17588359241275387. doi: 10.1177/17588359241275387. eCollection 2024.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39229471 (View on PubMed)

Facon T, Kumar SK, Plesner T, Orlowski RZ, Moreau P, Bahlis N, Basu S, Nahi H, Hulin C, Quach H, Goldschmidt H, Perrot A, Weisel K, Raje N, Macro M, Frenzel L, Leleu X, Wang J, Rampelbergh RV, Uhlar CM, Vermeulen J, Duran J, Borgsten F, Usmani SZ. Plain language summary of the MAIA study of daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of people with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Future Oncol. 2023 Apr;19(13):887-895. doi: 10.2217/fon-2023-0082. Epub 2023 May 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37212642 (View on PubMed)

Mateos MV, Rigaudeau S, Basu S, Spicka I, Schots R, Wrobel T, Cook G, Beksac M, Gries KS, Kudva A, Tromp B, Van Rampelbergh R, Pei H, Wroblewski S, Carson R, Delioukina M, White D. Switching to daratumumab SC from IV is safe and preferred by patients with multiple myeloma. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2023 Jul;29(5):1172-1177. doi: 10.1177/10781552221103551. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36067063 (View on PubMed)

Facon T, Kumar SK, Plesner T, Orlowski RZ, Moreau P, Bahlis N, Basu S, Nahi H, Hulin C, Quach H, Goldschmidt H, O'Dwyer M, Perrot A, Venner CP, Weisel K, Mace JR, Raje N, Tiab M, Macro M, Frenzel L, Leleu X, Ahmadi T, Wang J, Van Rampelbergh R, Uhlar CM, Tromp B, Delioukina M, Vermeulen J, Usmani SZ. Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MAIA): overall survival results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Nov;22(11):1582-1596. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00466-6. Epub 2021 Oct 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34655533 (View on PubMed)

Cavo M, San-Miguel J, Usmani SZ, Weisel K, Dimopoulos MA, Avet-Loiseau H, Paiva B, Bahlis NJ, Plesner T, Hungria V, Moreau P, Mateos MV, Perrot A, Iida S, Facon T, Kumar S, van de Donk NWCJ, Sonneveld P, Spencer A, Krevvata M, Heuck C, Wang J, Ukropec J, Kobos R, Sun S, Qi M, Munshi N. Prognostic value of minimal residual disease negativity in myeloma: combined analysis of POLLUX, CASTOR, ALCYONE, and MAIA. Blood. 2022 Feb 10;139(6):835-844. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021011101.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34289038 (View on PubMed)

San-Miguel J, Avet-Loiseau H, Paiva B, Kumar S, Dimopoulos MA, Facon T, Mateos MV, Touzeau C, Jakubowiak A, Usmani SZ, Cook G, Cavo M, Quach H, Ukropec J, Ramaswami P, Pei H, Qi M, Sun S, Wang J, Krevvata M, DeAngelis N, Heuck C, Van Rampelbergh R, Kudva A, Kobos R, Qi M, Bahlis NJ. Sustained minimal residual disease negativity in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and the impact of daratumumab in MAIA and ALCYONE. Blood. 2022 Jan 27;139(4):492-501. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020010439.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34269818 (View on PubMed)

Perrot A, Facon T, Plesner T, Usmani SZ, Kumar S, Bahlis NJ, Hulin C, Orlowski RZ, Nahi H, Mollee P, Ramasamy K, Roussel M, Jaccard A, Delforge M, Karlin L, Arnulf B, Chari A, He J, Ho KF, Van Rampelbergh R, Uhlar CM, Wang J, Kobos R, Gries KS, Fastenau J, Weisel K. Health-Related Quality of Life in Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Findings From the Phase III MAIA Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan 20;39(3):227-237. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01370. Epub 2020 Dec 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33326255 (View on PubMed)

Facon T, Kumar S, Plesner T, Orlowski RZ, Moreau P, Bahlis N, Basu S, Nahi H, Hulin C, Quach H, Goldschmidt H, O'Dwyer M, Perrot A, Venner CP, Weisel K, Mace JR, Raje N, Attal M, Tiab M, Macro M, Frenzel L, Leleu X, Ahmadi T, Chiu C, Wang J, Van Rampelbergh R, Uhlar CM, Kobos R, Qi M, Usmani SZ; MAIA Trial Investigators. Daratumumab plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for Untreated Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2019 May 30;380(22):2104-2115. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817249.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31141632 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

54767414MMY3008

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2014-002273-11

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR104762

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Study of Daratumumab
NCT05438043 RECRUITING PHASE3