Study of Carfilzomib, Daratumumab and Dexamethasone for Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

NCT ID: NCT03158688

Last Updated: 2025-05-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

466 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-13

Study Completion Date

2022-04-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Compare carfizomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab (KdD) to Carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) in terms of progression free survival (PFS) in participants with multiple myeloma who have relapsed after 1 to 3 prior therapies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a phase 3 multicenter, open-label, randomized study in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have received 1 to 3 prior therapies.

Participants receive the treatment determined by randomization for a maximum of approximately 5 years, up to 30 days prior to the final analysis data cutoff (DCO) date or until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death (whichever occurs first). No crossover between the treatment arms is allowed.

This was an open-label study. However, the assessment of response and disease progression for the primary analysis was determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) in a blinded manner. Sensitivity analyses of response and disease progression were determined centrally by the sponsor using a validated computer algorithm (Onyx Response Computational Assessment \[ORCA\]) in a blinded manner.

Following progression or discontinuation of study drug(s), participants will have 1 follow-up visit (30 days \[+3} after last dose of all study drug\[s\]). After disease progression, data on survival status and subsequent antimyeloma therapy will be gathered at long-term follow-up (LTFU) visits every 12 weeks (+/-2 weeks) until the Final Analysis DCO.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Kd - Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone

Carfilzomib was administered intravenously (IV) at 20 mg/m\^2 in Cycle 1: days 1 and 2; at 56 mg/m\^2 in Cycle 1: days 8, 9, 15 and 16. The 56 mg/m\^2 dosage was continued in Cycles 2+ on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16.

Dexamethasone was taken by IV infusion at 20 mg on Cycle 1, days 1 and 2 (in Cycles 2+, days 1 and 2 could be either oral or IV) and either orally or by IV infusion on days 8, 9, 15 and 16 and at 40 mg on day 22 of all 28-day cycles.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Commercially available oral and IV formulas were obtained by investigative sites. Amgen supplied IV or PO dexa for some countries (Poland, Hungry, Romania, Bulgaria, Korea). Dosage modification rules applied based on participant age (participants \> 75 years were given lower doses), dexa-related toxicities, and discontinuation of carfilzomib.

Carfilzomib

Intervention Type DRUG

Carfilzomib for infusion was supplied as a lyophilized, sterile product in single-use vials. The lyophilized product was reconstituted with preservative-free sterile water for injection, the reconstituted solution contained carfilzomib 2 mg/mL. IV injections lasted approximately 30 minutes.

Dose could be modified based on a \>20% change in body weight or toxicity.

KdD - Carfilzomib, Dexamethasone and Daratumumab

Carfilzomib was administered intravenously (IV) at 20 mg/m\^2 in Cycle 1: days 1 and 2; at 56 mg/m\^2 in Cycle 1: days 8, 9, 15 and 16. The 56 mg/m\^2 dosage was continued in Cycles 2+ on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16.

Dexamethasone was taken by IV infusion at 20 mg on Cycle 1, days 1 and 2 (in Cycles 2+, days 1 and 2 could be either oral or IV) and either orally or by IV infusion on days 8, 9, 15 and 16 and at 40 mg on day 22 of all 28-day cycles. The administration of dexamethasone was given on carfilzomib and/or daratumumab IV infusion days.

Daratumumab was administered by IV at 8 mg/kg on Cycle 1: days 1 and 2; at 16 mg/kg on Cycle 1: days 8, 15 and 22, and Cycle 2: days 1, 8, 15, and 22. The 16 mg/kg dosage was continued on Cycles 3-6: days 1 and 15. The 16 mg/kg was further continued on Cycles 7+: day 1 only.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Commercially available oral and IV formulas were obtained by investigative sites. Amgen supplied IV or PO dexa for some countries (Poland, Hungry, Romania, Bulgaria, Korea). Dosage modification rules applied based on participant age (participants \> 75 years were given lower doses), dexa-related toxicities, and discontinuation of carfilzomib.

Daratumumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Daratumumab was supplied as a concentrated solution for infusion in single-use vials.

Carfilzomib

Intervention Type DRUG

Carfilzomib for infusion was supplied as a lyophilized, sterile product in single-use vials. The lyophilized product was reconstituted with preservative-free sterile water for injection, the reconstituted solution contained carfilzomib 2 mg/mL. IV injections lasted approximately 30 minutes.

Dose could be modified based on a \>20% change in body weight or toxicity.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexamethasone

Commercially available oral and IV formulas were obtained by investigative sites. Amgen supplied IV or PO dexa for some countries (Poland, Hungry, Romania, Bulgaria, Korea). Dosage modification rules applied based on participant age (participants \> 75 years were given lower doses), dexa-related toxicities, and discontinuation of carfilzomib.

Intervention Type DRUG

Daratumumab

Daratumumab was supplied as a concentrated solution for infusion in single-use vials.

Intervention Type DRUG

Carfilzomib

Carfilzomib for infusion was supplied as a lyophilized, sterile product in single-use vials. The lyophilized product was reconstituted with preservative-free sterile water for injection, the reconstituted solution contained carfilzomib 2 mg/mL. IV injections lasted approximately 30 minutes.

Dose could be modified based on a \>20% change in body weight or toxicity.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

DARZALEX® KYPROLIS®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Criteria 1 Relapsed or progressive multiple myeloma after last treatment
* Criteria 2 Males or females ≥ 18 years of age
* Criteria 3 Measurable disease with at least 1 of the following assessed within 21 days prior to randomization:
* IgG multiple myeloma: serum monoclonal paraprotein (M-protein) level ≥ 1.0 g/dL,
* IgA, IgD, IgE multiple myeloma: serum M-protein level ≥ 0.5 g/dL,
* urine M-protein ≥ 200 mg/24 hours,
* in subjects without measurable serum or urine M- protein, serum free light chain (SFLC) ≥ 100 mg/L (involved light chain) and an abnormal serum kappa lambda ratio
* Criteria 4 Received at least 1 but not more than 3 prior lines of therapy for multiple myeloma (induction therapy followed by stem cell transplant and consolidation/maintenance therapy will be considered as 1 line of therapy
* Criteria 5 Prior therapy with carfilzomib is allowed as long as the patient had at least a partial response (PR) to most recent therapy with carfilzomib, was not removed due to toxicity, did not relapse within 60 days from discontinuation of carfilzomib, and will have at least a 6-month carfilzomib treatment-free interval from last dose received until first study treatment. (Patients may receive maintenance therapy with drugs that are not proteasome inhibitors or CD38 antibodies during this 6-month carfilzomib treatment free interval)
* Criteria 6 Prior therapy with anti-CD38 antibodies is allowed as long as the patient had at least a PR to most recent therapy with CD38 antibody, was not removed due to toxicity, did not relapse within 60 days from intensive treatment (at least every other week) of CD38 antibody therapy, and will have at least a 6 month CD38 antibody treatment-free interval from last dose received until first study treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* Criteria 1 Waldenström macroglobulinemia
* Criteria 2 Multiple myeloma of IgM subtype
* Criteria 3 POEMS syndrome (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein, and skin changes)
* Criteria 4 Plasma cell leukemia (\> 2.0 \* 10\^9/L circulating plasma cells by standard differential)
* Criteria 5 Myelodysplastic syndrome
* Criteria 6 Known moderate or severe persistent asthma within the past 2 years
* Criteria 7 Known chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with a FEV1 \< 50% of predicted normal
* Criteria 8 Active congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] Class III to IV), symptomatic ischemia, uncontrolled arrhythmias, clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities, screening ECG with corrected QT interval (QTc) of \> 470 msec, pericardial disease, or myocardial infarction within 4 months prior to randomization
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Amgen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Amgen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Lynn Cancer Center Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Lynn Cancer Institute

Boca Raton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory University Winship Cancer Institute

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

University of Chicago Medical Center - Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Fort Wayne Medical Oncology and Hematology

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Hattiesburg Clinic Hematology/Oncology

Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Hackensack University Medical Center

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Levine Cancer Institute

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Gabrail Cancer Center, LLC

Dover, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Charleston Oncology

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center at Dallas

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Liverpool Hospital

Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

St Vincents Hospital Sydney

St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Westmead Hospital

Westmead, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital

Herston, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Princess Alexandra Hospital

Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Royal Adelaide Hospital

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Epworth Healthcare

East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

St Vincents Hospital Melbourne

Fitzroy, VIC, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Barwon Health, University Hospital Geelong

Geelong, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

The Alfred Hospital

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Medizinische Universitaet Graz

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Stuivenberg

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Grand Hôpital de Charleroi

Charleroi, , Belgium

Site Status

Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven - Campus Gasthuisberg

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Sveti Georgi EAD

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Sveti Ivan Rilski EAD

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Specialized Hospital for Active Treatment of Hematology Diseases EAD

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Tom Baker Cancer Centre

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Cross Cancer Institute

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Fakultni nemocnice Brno

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Fakultni nemocnice Hradec Kralove

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Fakultni nemocnice Ostrava

Ostrava-Poruba, , Czechia

Site Status

Fakultni nemocnice Plzen

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Départemental les Oudairies

La Roche-sur-Yon, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de Versailles - Hopital Andre Mignot

Le Chesnay, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille - Hôpital Claude Huriez

Lille, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux - Hopital Haut Leveque

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers - Hopital la Miletrie

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy - Hopital de Brabois

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

General Hospital Evangelismos

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Alexandra Hospital

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

General University Hospital of Patras Panagia i Voithia

Pátrai, , Greece

Site Status

Theagenion Cancer Hospital of Thessaloniki

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Bekes Megyei Kozponti Korhaz Dr Rethy Pal Tagkorhaz

Békéscsaba, , Hungary

Site Status

Semmelweis Egyetem

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Del-pesti Centrumkorhaz - Orszagos Hematologiai es Infektologiai Intezet

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Klinikai Kozpont Altalanos Orvostudomanyi Kar

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Nagoya City University Hospital

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Site Status

Toyohashi Municipal Hospital

Toyohashi, Aichi-ken, Japan

Site Status

Tesshokai Kameda General Hospital

Kamogawa-shi, Chiba, Japan

Site Status

National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Kyushu University Hospital

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Ogaki Municipal Hospital

Ogaki-shi, Gifu, Japan

Site Status

Gunma University Hospital

Maebashi, Gunma, Japan

Site Status

National Hospital Organization Shibukawa Medical Center

Shibukawa-shi, Gunma, Japan

Site Status

University Hospital Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine

Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan

Site Status

Niigata Cancer Center Hospital

Niigata, Niigata, Japan

Site Status

National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center

Okayama, Okayama-ken, Japan

Site Status

Osaka University Hospital

Suita-shi, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Saitama Medical Center

Kawagoe-shi, Saitama, Japan

Site Status

Tochigi Cancer Center

Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan

Site Status

Tokushima Prefectural Central Hospital

Tokushima, Tokushima, Japan

Site Status

Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research

Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Japanese Red Cross Medical Center

Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

InterHem

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Samodzielny Publiczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Zespol Szpitali Miejskich w Chorzowie

Chorzów, , Poland

Site Status

Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im Swietego Jana z Dukli

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Szpital Kliniczny Przemienienia Panskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego im K Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Instytut Hematologii i Transfuzjologii

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny im Jana Mikulicza-Radeckiego we Wroclawiu

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Policlinica de Diagnostic Rapid

Brasov, , Romania

Site Status

Spitalul Clinic Colentina

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Fundeni Clinical Institute

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Coltea Clinical Hospital

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest Emergency University Hospital

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Profesor Dr Ion Chiricuta Institut of Oncology

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Spitalul Clinic Municipal Filantropia Craiova

Craiova, , Romania

Site Status

SBHI of Nizhny Novgorod region Regional Clinical Hospital of Nizhny Novgorod na N A Semashko

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

SBHI of Republic of Karelia Republic Hosiptal n a V A Baranov

Petrozavodsk, , Russia

Site Status

State Budget Educational Institution of High Professional Skills Samara State Medical University

Samara, , Russia

Site Status

Clinic of professional pathology and hematology

Saratov, , Russia

Site Status

National Cancer Center

Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital

Hwasun, Jeollanam-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Severance Hospital Yonsei University Health System

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Asan Medical Center

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Samsung Medical Center

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St Marys Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Hospital Clinico Universitario de Salamanca

Salamanca, Castilla León, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol

Badalona, Cataluña, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona

Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain

Site Status

Clinica Universidad de Navarra

Pamplona, Navarre, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei Veterans General Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Hacettepe Universitesi Tip Fakultesi

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Ankara Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Cebeci Hastanesi

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Ege University Faculty of Medicine

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Ondokuz Mayis Universitesi Tip Fakultesi

Samsun, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

St James University Hospital

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

University College London Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Christie Hospital

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Belgium Bulgaria Canada Czechia France Greece Hungary Japan Poland Romania Russia South Korea Spain Taiwan Turkey (Türkiye) United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Quach H, Nooka A, Samoylova O, Venner CP, Kim K, Facon T, Spencer A, Usmani SZ, Grosicki S, Suzuki K, Delimpasi S, Weisel K, Obreja M, Zahlten-Kumeli A, Mateos MV. Carfilzomib, dexamethasone and daratumumab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: results of the phase III study CANDOR by prior lines of therapy. Br J Haematol. 2021 Aug;194(4):784-788. doi: 10.1111/bjh.17541. Epub 2021 May 28. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34046887 (View on PubMed)

Siegel D, Weisel K, Zahlten-Kumeli A, Medhekar R, Ding B, Leleu X. Health-related quality of life outcomes from the CANDOR study in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2021 Dec;62(12):3002-3010. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1941927. Epub 2021 Jun 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34180331 (View on PubMed)

Suzuki K, Min CK, Kim K, Lee JJ, Shibayama H, Ko PS, Huang SY, Li SS, Ding B, Khurana M, Iida S. Carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab in Asian patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: post hoc subgroup analysis of the phase 3 CANDOR trial. Int J Hematol. 2021 Dec;114(6):653-663. doi: 10.1007/s12185-021-03204-9. Epub 2021 Aug 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34410635 (View on PubMed)

Usmani SZ, Quach H, Mateos MV, Landgren O, Leleu X, Siegel D, Weisel K, Gavriatopoulou M, Oriol A, Rabin N, Nooka A, Qi M, Beksac M, Jakubowiak A, Ding B, Zahlten-Kumeli A, Yusuf A, Dimopoulos M. Carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CANDOR): updated outcomes from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):65-76. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00579-9. Epub 2021 Dec 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34871550 (View on PubMed)

Landgren O, Weisel K, Rosinol L, Touzeau C, Turgut M, Hajek R, Mollee P, Kim JS, Shu N, Hu X, Li C, Usmani SZ. Subgroup analysis based on cytogenetic risk in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in the CANDOR study. Br J Haematol. 2022 Sep;198(6):988-993. doi: 10.1111/bjh.18233. Epub 2022 May 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35608261 (View on PubMed)

Dimopoulos M, Quach H, Mateos MV, Landgren O, Leleu X, Siegel D, Weisel K, Yang H, Klippel Z, Zahlten-Kumeli A, Usmani SZ. Carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CANDOR): results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2020 Jul 18;396(10245):186-197. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30734-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32682484 (View on PubMed)

Leleu X, Beksac M, Chou T, Dimopoulos M, Yoon SS, Prince HM, Pour L, Shelekhova T, Chari A, Khurana M, Zhang J, Obreja M, Qi M, Oriol A, Siegel D. Efficacy and safety of weekly carfilzomib (70 mg/m2), dexamethasone, and daratumumab (KdD70) is comparable to twice-weekly KdD56 while being a more convenient dosing option: a cross-study comparison of the CANDOR and EQUULEUS studies. Leuk Lymphoma. 2021 Feb;62(2):358-367. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1832672. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33112184 (View on PubMed)

Usmani SZ, Quach H, Mateos MV, Landgren O, Leleu X, Siegel D, Weisel K, Shu X, Li C, Dimopoulos M. Final analysis of carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab vs carfilzomib and dexamethasone in the CANDOR study. Blood Adv. 2023 Jul 25;7(14):3739-3748. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010026.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37163358 (View on PubMed)

Weisel K, Mateos MV, Landgren O, Leleu X, Quach H, Bennett L, Talpes M, Majer I, Patel S, Usmani SZ. Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated With Carfilzomib, Dexamethasone, and Daratumumab Versus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone: An Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes From the Phase 3 CANDOR Trial. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2025 Aug;25(8):590-605. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.02.005. Epub 2025 Feb 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 40087058 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.amgentrials.com

AmgenTrials clinical trials website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-003554-33

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

20160275

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.