Rocuronium Dose Finding Study After Single-shot or Steady-state Propofol Anesthesia

NCT ID: NCT02054468

Last Updated: 2014-05-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

82 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-03-31

Study Completion Date

2014-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is designed to determine the effective-doses ED-50 and ED-95 (the doses required for a 50% and 95% twitch inhibition, respectively) of the non-depolarizing muscle relaxant rocuronium after single-shot or steady-state propofol anesthesia in a clinical setting.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Neuromuscular blocking agents are worldwide used as a standard component of a modern balanced anesthesia regime. They are administered to facilitate tracheal intubation, reduce laryngeal trauma and optimize surgical conditions. The dose usually recommended to facilitate tracheal intubation approximates at least two times the drug´s effective dose ED-95 (the dose required for a 95% effect) depending on the choice of the neuromuscular blocking agent. This overdose is administered to induce a very deep paralysis with a fast onset of action providing clinically acceptable intubating conditions. Moreover, our clinical experience has shown that the dose-relationship of a neuromuscular blocking agents estimated during steady-state anesthesia does not necessarily correlate with the dose-response curve of the same drug during anesthetic induction. Therefore, a discrepancy between the applied dose and the clinical outcome measure, the intubating conditions, becomes apparent. This might be related to effects of the co-administered anesthetics at the neuromuscular junction. While inhaled anesthetics augment the paralyzing effects of non-depolarizering muscle relaxants in a dose-dependent fashion and depend on the duration of anesthesia, little is known about the interactions of the intravenous anesthetic propofol with the non-depolarizing blocking agent rocuronium. We hypothesize that the intravenous administration of propofol also influences the potency of rocuronium dependant on the duration of its application.

This study, therefore, is designed to determine the dose-response relationship of rocuronium after single-shot or steady-state propofol anesthesia in a clinical setting. The primary endpoints are the ED-50s and ED-95s of rocuronium during anesthetic induction with a single-shot propofol and after 30minutes of steady-state propofol anesthesia. The secondary endpoints are the slopes and the intercepts of the respective dose-response-curves, the onset and duration of muscle paralysis and the recovery from neuromuscular blockade.

Materials \& Methods

We will investigate patients scheduled for elective low-risk surgical procedures under general anesthesia. Patients will be allocated to two experimental groups. After neuromuscular monitoring is established under remifentanil infusion, patients of the group "Induction" will receive a single-shot propofol followed by injection of rocuronium and endotracheal intubation. Patients of the group "Maintenance" will be anaesthetized with an induction dose of propofol followed by 30 minutes of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA: propofol/ remifentanil) before rocuronium is administered. Airway will be managed using a laryngeal mask or tracheal intubation.

During surgery, anesthesia will be maintained with TIVA. Onset and duration of neuromuscular blockade and spontaneous recovery will be monitored with electromyography.

Postoperatively, patients will be monitored for 60 minutes in our post-anesthesia care unit.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neuromuscular Blockade Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single-shot-Propofol & Remifentanil

Induction group: A single-shot propofol induction dose with remifentanil infusion followed by injection of rocuronium (for doses, please see interventions). Airway: tracheal intubation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Single-Shot Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Single-shot propofol induction dose (1.5-2.5mg/kg body mass)

Remifentanil infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Remifentanil infusion (0.1-0.2µg/kg/min)

Rocuronium (0.07mg/kg/body mass)

Intervention Type DRUG

Rocuronium (0.07mg/kg/body mass)

Rocuronium (0.1mg/kg/body mass)

Intervention Type DRUG

Rocuronium (0.1mg/kg/body mass)

Rocuronium (0.15mg/kg/body mass)

Intervention Type DRUG

Rocuronium (0.15mg/kg/body mass)

Rocuronium (0.2mg/kg/body mass)

Intervention Type DRUG

Rocuronium (0.2mg/kg/body mass)

Rocuronium (0.3mg/kg/body mass)

Intervention Type DRUG

Rocuronium (0.3mg/kg/body mass)

Rocuronium (0.45mg/kg/body mass)

Intervention Type DRUG

Rocuronium (0.45mg/kg/body mass)

30min infusion Propofol & Remifentanil

Maintenance group: 30min of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and remifentanil before rocuronium (for doses, please see interventions) is administered. Airway: tracheal intubation/laryngeal mask

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

30min infusion Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

30min of propofol infusion (4-6mg/kg/h)

Remifentanil infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Remifentanil infusion (0.1-0.2µg/kg/min)

Rocuronium (0.07mg/kg/body mass)

Intervention Type DRUG

Rocuronium (0.07mg/kg/body mass)

Rocuronium (0.1mg/kg/body mass)

Intervention Type DRUG

Rocuronium (0.1mg/kg/body mass)

Rocuronium (0.15mg/kg/body mass)

Intervention Type DRUG

Rocuronium (0.15mg/kg/body mass)

Rocuronium (0.2mg/kg/body mass)

Intervention Type DRUG

Rocuronium (0.2mg/kg/body mass)

Rocuronium (0.3mg/kg/body mass)

Intervention Type DRUG

Rocuronium (0.3mg/kg/body mass)

Rocuronium (0.45mg/kg/body mass)

Intervention Type DRUG

Rocuronium (0.45mg/kg/body mass)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Single-Shot Propofol

Single-shot propofol induction dose (1.5-2.5mg/kg body mass)

Intervention Type DRUG

30min infusion Propofol

30min of propofol infusion (4-6mg/kg/h)

Intervention Type DRUG

Remifentanil infusion

Remifentanil infusion (0.1-0.2µg/kg/min)

Intervention Type DRUG

Rocuronium (0.07mg/kg/body mass)

Rocuronium (0.07mg/kg/body mass)

Intervention Type DRUG

Rocuronium (0.1mg/kg/body mass)

Rocuronium (0.1mg/kg/body mass)

Intervention Type DRUG

Rocuronium (0.15mg/kg/body mass)

Rocuronium (0.15mg/kg/body mass)

Intervention Type DRUG

Rocuronium (0.2mg/kg/body mass)

Rocuronium (0.2mg/kg/body mass)

Intervention Type DRUG

Rocuronium (0.3mg/kg/body mass)

Rocuronium (0.3mg/kg/body mass)

Intervention Type DRUG

Rocuronium (0.45mg/kg/body mass)

Rocuronium (0.45mg/kg/body mass)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

2,6-Diisopropylphenol 2,6-Diisopropylphenol Ultiva® Esmeron Esmeron Esmeron Esmeron Esmeron Esmeron

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients scheduled for a low risk-surgical procedure under general anesthesia
2. Patients ASA physical status I-III
3. Patients older than 18years
4. Patients having given informed consent to the study

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients who decline to give informed consent to the study
2. Known or suspected allergy towards anesthetics or rocuronium
3. Pregnant and breastfeeding women
4. Known or suspected neuromuscular disease
5. Burn injury prior to the investigation
6. Anatomic and functional malformations with expected difficult intubation
7. Anorexia, Bulimia nervosa, Malnutrition
8. Heart failure
9. Use of drugs that interfere with muscle relaxant
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Technical University of Munich

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Manfred Blobner, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 München, Germany

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München

Munich, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Naguib M, Seraj M, Abdulrazik E. Pipecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade during nitrous oxide-fentanyl, enflurane, isoflurane, and halothane anesthesia in surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 1992 Aug;75(2):193-7. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199208000-00007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1321569 (View on PubMed)

Viby-Mogensen J, Jorgensen BC, Ording H. Residual curarization in the recovery room. Anesthesiology. 1979 Jun;50(6):539-41. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197906000-00014. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 156513 (View on PubMed)

Debaene B, Plaud B, Dilly MP, Donati F. Residual paralysis in the PACU after a single intubating dose of nondepolarizing muscle relaxant with an intermediate duration of action. Anesthesiology. 2003 May;98(5):1042-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200305000-00004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12717123 (View on PubMed)

Eikermann M, Blobner M, Groeben H, Rex C, Grote T, Neuhauser M, Beiderlinden M, Peters J. Postoperative upper airway obstruction after recovery of the train of four ratio of the adductor pollicis muscle from neuromuscular blockade. Anesth Analg. 2006 Mar;102(3):937-42. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000195233.80166.14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16492855 (View on PubMed)

Hemmerling TM, Le N, Decarie P, Cousineau J, Bracco D. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol augments the potency of mivacurium. Can J Anaesth. 2008 Jun;55(6):351-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03021490.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18566198 (View on PubMed)

Robertson EN, Fragen RJ, Booij LH, van Egmond J, Crul JF. Some effects of diisopropyl phenol (ICI 35 868) on the pharmacodynamics of atracurium and vecuronium in anaesthetized man. Br J Anaesth. 1983 Aug;55(8):723-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/55.8.723.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6136286 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ROSANNA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study of Postoperative ICC Analgesia
NCT04939545 COMPLETED PHASE3