Optimal Volume, Rate, and Interval of Bolus Nerve Catheters for Shoulder Surgery
NCT ID: NCT02946268
Last Updated: 2019-11-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE4
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-02-21
2017-02-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study will be conducted in three stages. In the first stage the ideal bolus volume of ropivacaine will be determined. In the second stage the optimal rate of delivery of the bolus (infusion rate) will be determined. Finally, once both the ideal volume and infusion rate has been determined, the optimal interval between boluses of local anesthetic will be determined.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ideal Initial Bolus and Infusion Rate for Erector Spinae Plane Block Catheters
NCT03961048
Patient-Titrated Automated Intermittent Boluses of Local Anesthetic vs. a Continuous Infusion Via a Perineural Catheter for Postoperative Analgesia
NCT05091905
Continuous Infusions vs Scheduled Bolus Infusions
NCT03230565
Adductor Canal Block With Continuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Boluses and Morphine Consumption
NCT02539628
Bupivacaine Versus Ropivacaine on Diaphragmatic Motility and Ventilatory Function
NCT02059070
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Continuous peripheral nerve catheters have been shown to improve pain control in several orthopedic surgical procedures when compared to opioids. However, it is not uncommon for patients to experience breakthrough pain in spite of a functional peripheral nerve block. Many times, this breakthrough pain can be managed with a bolus of local anesthetic administered by an anesthesia provider. Until recently, the vast majority of peripheral nerve catheter infusion pumps have only had the capability of providing a constant rate of local anesthetic administration. Newer technology allows for infusion pumps to deliver intermittent mandatory boluses of local anesthetic. This technique of local anesthetic administration has previously been evaluated with popliteal nerve blocks, but to our knowledge has never been evaluated for use with interscalene nerve catheters.
Currently, data would support the idea that a bolus of local anesthetic can improve analgesia with decreased side effects compared to a continuous infusion. However, there is little data evaluating the optimal volume of bolus, the optimal speed of delivery, or the optimal interval between local anesthetic boluses.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Volume of bolus
Ropivacaine 0.2% volume increased or decreased by 1ml based on previous patient experience. If pain greater than or equal to 5/10 in the previous patient, the current patient will receive an increase in volume of bolus by 1ml. If pain is less than 5/10 in the previous patient the current patient will receive a decrease in volume by 1ml.
Ropivacaine
Change in administration of ropivacaine. Rate, Volume and Interval of bolus altered.
Rate of delivery of bolus
Ropivacaine 0.2% rate increased or decreased by 50ml/hr based on previous patient experience. If pain greater than or equal to 5/10 in the previous patient at 30 minutes, the current patient will receive an increase in rate of bolus by 50ml/hr. If the pain is less than 5/10 the rate will be decreased by 50ml/hr.
Ropivacaine
Change in administration of ropivacaine. Rate, Volume and Interval of bolus altered.
Interval between bolus
Ropivacaine 0.2% interval increased or decreased by 1 hour based on previous patient experience. If the previous patient received pain score of 2/10 at 2 hours then the current patient will have an interval of three hours. If the pain is greater than 2/10, the interval will be shortened by 1 hour.
Ropivacaine
Change in administration of ropivacaine. Rate, Volume and Interval of bolus altered.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ropivacaine
Change in administration of ropivacaine. Rate, Volume and Interval of bolus altered.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients scheduled to undergo unilateral shoulder surgery at Duke University Medical Center, including arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, acromioplasty, hemiarthroplasty, and total shoulder replacement.
* American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Physical Class 1-3.
* BMI ≤40 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with chronic pain (pain existing for longer than 6 months), or taking chronic opioids (greater than 60 morphine equivalents per day) at time of surgery
* Contraindications to or known drug interactions with local anesthetics
* Patients who will be discharged home directly from PACU
* Planned administration of another investigational product or procedure during the subject's participation in this study.
* Patients who do not have the capacity to give legally effective consent
* Suspected, or known addiction to or abuse of illicit drug(s), prescription medicine(s), or alcohol within the past 2 years.
* Uncontrolled anxiety, schizophrenia, or other psychiatric disorder that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may interfere with study assessments or compliance.
* Current or historical evidence of any clinically significant disease or condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may increase the risk of surgery or complicate the subject's postoperative course.
* Pregnant women
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Duke University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joshua R Dooley, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Duke Ambulatory Surgery Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00072762
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.