A Comparison of Appendicectomy Outcomes in Children Between Paediatric and General Surgical Centres in Scotland
NCT ID: NCT02047786
Last Updated: 2014-01-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
4000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2001-01-31
2013-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Appendicectomy (or appendectomy in US usage) is the single most commonly performed emergency surgical operation performed on British children. Previous investigation of outcomes following appendicectomy has suggested that specialist surgeons and high volume centres have fewer "negative" appendicectomies (i.e. the appendix found to be non-diseased), although there has not been consistent association found between hospital type or surgeon experience and complication rate or admission rate.
Scotland has 3 dedicated children's surgery centres but straightforward children's surgery such as appendicectomy is also carried out in the country's general surgical centres. Appendicectomy outcome variations have not been explored in the Scottish National Health Service (NHS).
Aim
This study will compare appendicectomy outcomes in children between Scotland's specialist paediatric centres and general surgical centres.
Methods
This is a retrospective study of all appendicectomies performed in Scotland during the period from 1st January 2001 - 31st December 2010, on children aged 2 - 12 years old. It will use routinely collected administrative data from the Information Services Division of NHS National Services Scotland.
The study will compare risk-adjusted 30 day/in-patient mortality, 30 day re-admission rate, 30 day re-operation rate, post-operative length of stay and negative appendicectomy rates.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Geographic Influences on Appendicectomy Outcomes
NCT02017951
a Retrospective Observational Study Comparing Outcomes of Retrocaecal Appendicitis With Non-retrocaecal Appendicitis
NCT05315869
Colonic Resections in Patients With Suspected Appendicitis
NCT00888888
COlonic Salvage by Therapeutic Appendectomy.
NCT03912714
Retrospective Acute Care Appendectomy Study
NCT06624215
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This is a retrospective study of all appendicectomies performed in Scotland during the period from 1st January 2001 - 31st December 2010, on children aged 2 - 12 years old or younger. It will use routinely collected administrative data from the Information Services Division (ISD) of NHS National Services Scotland.
The registry which will supply the data for this study is the Scottish Morbidity Record 01 (SMR01), the full title of which is the "General / Acute Inpatient and Day Case dataset" (see http://www.adls.ac.uk/nhs-scotland/general-acute-inpatient-day-case-smr01/?detail). SMR01 is collated and administered by ISD, and data submission is mandatory for all Scottish NHS providers of in-patient or day-case care. Approximately 1.4 million records are added each year. Diagnoses are coded according to International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 standards and procedures are coded according to the United Kingdom's Office of Population Census Statistics (OPCS) standards, of which the most current is version 4.5.
The data quality in SMR01 is high and is assured by regular internal audits. In the 2010 audit of accuracy, Main Condition was recorded with an accuracy of 88% and Main Procedure was recorded with an accuracy of 94%. Where data inconsistencies are identified in the extract supplied for this study, further clarification will be obtained where possible with ISD's data retrieval support team.
The study period was decided on pragmatically by a desire to provide an assessment of current practice, fully within the era of widely practised laparoscopic surgery. A power calculation also suggested that this would provide an adequate sample size to demonstrate differences.
Our power calculation- specific to length of stay- was based on Faiz O, Clark J, Brown T, Bottle A, Antoniou A, Farrands P, et al. Traditional and Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Adults. Ann Surg. 2008 Nov;248(5):800-6. In their cohort of 259,735 appendicectomies performed from 1996-2006, the geometric mean length of stay was 3.52, with SD 1.8. We decided that a difference of 0.5 days would be 'clinically significant'. We specified alpha 0.05 and Power 0.9, and an allocation ratio of 1:1. A two-sided t-test of difference between two independent means was performed in G\*Power 3.1.7. This demonstrated that a total N of 548 was required to demonstrate this difference.
In the last epidemiological study of appendicitis in Scotland (Bisset AF. Appendicectomy in Scotland: a 20-year epidemiological comparison. J Public Health. 1997 Jun 1;19(2):213-8), 1522 appendicectomies in 1993 were performed in children aged 0-15 years old. This suggests that a 10 year cohort should be more than adequate to detect a clinically significant difference in length of stay.
Data completeness is very high in SMR01. However, where significant volumes of data are missing or unusable, the need for data imputation will be explored.
The study will compare risk-adjusted 30 day/in-patient mortality, 30 day re-admission rate, 30 day re-operation rate, post-operative length of stay and negative appendicectomy rates between Scotland's specialist paediatric centres and general surgical centres.
Potentially significant confounding variables such as age, gender, and co-morbidity will be studied for their predictive value in a univariate model and included in a multivariate model if they remain significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
General Hospital Patients
Those patients undergoing appendicectomy in a general (non-specialised) surgical centre.
No interventions assigned to this group
Paediatric Hospital Patients
Those patients undergoing appendicectomy in specialised paediatric centres.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Episodes will be extracted with the following codes:
OPCS (Office of Population Censuses and Surveys), revision 4.5
H01 Emergency excision of appendix
Exclusion Criteria
* We will exclude patients who are non-resident in Scotland since we will be unable to derive depravity index and urban-rural classification, and may not have access to information on co-morbidities and mortality.
2 Years
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Edinburgh
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ewen M Harrison, FRCS, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Edinburgh
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
All Scottish NHS Hospitals
All Scottish Surgical Facilities, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
XRB13069-PGA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.