Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
2006 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-04-30
2018-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this prospective multicentric cohort study, women will be universally screened for pregestational diabetes and GDM at the first prenatal visit during the first trimester by measuring the fasting plasma glucose. In the second trimester, women without diagnosis of diabetes or GDM in the first trimester, will be universally screened for GDM using the 50g glucose challenge test (GCT) and the 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with the IADPSG criteria for GDM. Diagnosis of GDM will be based on the 75g OGTT.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Belgian Diabetes in Pregnancy Follow-up Study
NCT04429958
Early PrEgnancy Complications Testing
NCT04079361
Pregnancy Cohort Study: Pregnancy as a Window to Future Health
NCT06925815
Prospective Study in Pregnant Women With Hypercoagulopathy
NCT00215969
Non Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) of Single-gene Disorders
NCT02339402
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The General hypothesis is that the IADPSG screening strategy will lead to an important increase in the work load and the prevalence of GDM in Belgium but that this might not be cost effective concerning the prevention of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The risk to develop type 2 diabetes postpartum will probably be lower than for women diagnosed with the two-step screening strategy.
In this prospective cohort study, women will be universally screened for pregestational diabetes and GDM at the first prenatal visit during the first trimester by measuring the fasting plasma glucose. GDM will be defined as a fasting plasma glucose ≥100-125mg/dl. This will allow to identify the most important risk factors for the development of GDM.
In the second trimester, women will be universally screened for GDM using the 50g glucose challenge test (GCT) and the 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)with the IADPSG criteria for GDM. Compared to the IADPSG screening strategy used in normal routine, the 50g GCT will be an extra test specific for the study. Diagnosis of GDM will be based on the 75g OGTT. Participants and researchers will therefore be blinded for the result of the GCT. The results of the GCT test will be used at the end of the study for research purposes only. The use of a GCT as an universal screening tool in a two-step approach with the use of the 75g 2-hour OGTT with the IADPSG criteria only if the GCT is abnormal, is not yet validated and will be evaluated in the study, since this could be a practical solution. Differences in GDM prevalence and pregnancy outcomes will be analyzed using different diagnostic criteria based on the 75g OGTT: the Carpenter \& Coustan criteria, the IADPSG criteria, and threshold values if diagnostic criteria would be based on an odds ratio of 2.0. The evaluation of different screening strategies and different diagnostic criteria will allow to explore the most cost effective methods for identifying women at risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes and at high risk for the development of type 2 diabetes after pregnancy. By using a multivariable risk estimation model based on the most relevant clinical risk factors and biochemical measures for GDM in our own population, the aim is to develop a simple and cost effective screening algorithm.
This study will also allow to evaluate the best short-term follow up strategy postpartum for women with a previous history of GDM. Different screening tests will be used three months postpartum: a fasting plasma glucose, Hba1c and 75g OGTT.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
pregnant women without known diabetes
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* singleton pregnancy
* between 6-13 weeks of pregnancy
* the delivery has to be planned in the hospital where the study is performed.
Exclusion Criteria
* multiple pregnancy
* known diabetes or taking metformin
* chronic treatment with corticoids
* signs of a miscarriage
* Chronic medical condition: uncontrolled hypertension, severe heart disease, severe chronic liver disease, severe chronic kidney disease, chronic infection (such as HIV or hepatitis)
* bariatric surgery
* delivery is planned in another center than the screening
* a normal follow up and treatment during pregnancy will not be possible (due to incompliance, psychiatric problems, severe communication problems…)
* participating in another study with any medication or intervention ( including life style intervention) up to 90 days before the start of the study
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The National Lottery
UNKNOWN
FWO clinical doctoral scholarship
UNKNOWN
Novo Nordisk A/S
INDUSTRY
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
INDUSTRY
Sanofi
INDUSTRY
AstraZeneca
INDUSTRY
Novartis
INDUSTRY
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Katrien Benhalima, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
OLV Aalst
Aalst, , Belgium
UZA
Antwerp, , Belgium
OLV Aalst-site Asse
Asse, , Belgium
Imelda Bonheiden
Bonheiden, , Belgium
AZ St Jan
Bruges, , Belgium
Kliniek St Jan Brussel
Brussels, , Belgium
UZ Leuven
Leuven, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Beunen K, Van den Abbeele F, Van Crombrugge P, Verhaeghe J, Vandeginste S, Verlaenen H, Maes T, Dufraimont E, Roggen N, De Block C, Jacquemyn Y, Mekahli F, De Clippel K, Van den Bruel A, Loccufier A, Laenen A, Devlieger R, Mathieu C, Benhalima K. Fetal size monitoring in women with gestational diabetes and normal glucose tolerance. Acta Diabetol. 2025 Jan;62(1):35-48. doi: 10.1007/s00592-024-02330-0. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
Raets L, Vandewinkel M, Van Crombrugge P, Moyson C, Verhaeghe J, Vandeginste S, Verlaenen H, Vercammen C, Maes T, Dufraimont E, Roggen N, De Block C, Jacquemyn Y, Mekahli F, De Clippel K, Van Den Bruel A, Loccufier A, Laenen A, Devlieger R, Mathieu C, Benhalima K. Preference of Women for Gestational Diabetes Screening Method According to Tolerance of Tests and Population Characteristics. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 8;12:781384. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.781384. eCollection 2021.
Minschart C, De Weerdt K, Elegeert A, Van Crombrugge P, Moyson C, Verhaeghe J, Vandeginste S, Verlaenen H, Vercammen C, Maes T, Dufraimont E, De Block C, Jacquemyn Y, Mekahli F, De Clippel K, Van Den Bruel A, Loccufier A, Laenen A, Devlieger R, Mathieu C, Benhalima K. Antenatal Depression and Risk of Gestational Diabetes, Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes, and Postpartum Quality of Life. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Jul 13;106(8):e3110-e3124. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab156.
Benhalima K, Van Crombrugge P, Verhaeghe J, Vandeginste S, Verlaenen H, Vercammen C, Dufraimont E, De Block C, Jacquemyn Y, Mekahli F, De Clippel K, Devlieger R, Mathieu C. The Belgian Diabetes in Pregnancy Study (BEDIP-N), a multi-centric prospective cohort study on screening for diabetes in pregnancy and gestational diabetes: methodology and design. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jul 11;14:226. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-226.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BEDIP-N study
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.