The Belgian Diabetes in Pregnancy Study: BEDIP-N Study

NCT ID: NCT02036619

Last Updated: 2018-05-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

2006 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-04-30

Study Completion Date

2018-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The General hypothesis is that the IADPSG screening strategy for gestational diabetes (GDM) will lead to an important increase in the work load and the prevalence of GDM in Belgium but that this might not be cost effective concerning the prevention of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The risk to develop type 2 diabetes postpartum will probably be lower than for women diagnosed with the two-step screening strategy.

In this prospective multicentric cohort study, women will be universally screened for pregestational diabetes and GDM at the first prenatal visit during the first trimester by measuring the fasting plasma glucose. In the second trimester, women without diagnosis of diabetes or GDM in the first trimester, will be universally screened for GDM using the 50g glucose challenge test (GCT) and the 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with the IADPSG criteria for GDM. Diagnosis of GDM will be based on the 75g OGTT.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Accurate data on the prevalence of gestational diabetes (GDM) are lacking in Belgium and the current practice for screening for GDM varies across different centers. The discrepancy in recommendations is due to the lack of data based on research in our population concerning the best screening strategy for pregestational diabetes in early pregnancy and the lack of data on the best screening strategy for GDM. A substantial number of centers in Belgium already use the IADPSG screening strategy although not always a an universal screening strategy or not always as an one-step screening strategy.

The General hypothesis is that the IADPSG screening strategy will lead to an important increase in the work load and the prevalence of GDM in Belgium but that this might not be cost effective concerning the prevention of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The risk to develop type 2 diabetes postpartum will probably be lower than for women diagnosed with the two-step screening strategy.

In this prospective cohort study, women will be universally screened for pregestational diabetes and GDM at the first prenatal visit during the first trimester by measuring the fasting plasma glucose. GDM will be defined as a fasting plasma glucose ≥100-125mg/dl. This will allow to identify the most important risk factors for the development of GDM.

In the second trimester, women will be universally screened for GDM using the 50g glucose challenge test (GCT) and the 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)with the IADPSG criteria for GDM. Compared to the IADPSG screening strategy used in normal routine, the 50g GCT will be an extra test specific for the study. Diagnosis of GDM will be based on the 75g OGTT. Participants and researchers will therefore be blinded for the result of the GCT. The results of the GCT test will be used at the end of the study for research purposes only. The use of a GCT as an universal screening tool in a two-step approach with the use of the 75g 2-hour OGTT with the IADPSG criteria only if the GCT is abnormal, is not yet validated and will be evaluated in the study, since this could be a practical solution. Differences in GDM prevalence and pregnancy outcomes will be analyzed using different diagnostic criteria based on the 75g OGTT: the Carpenter \& Coustan criteria, the IADPSG criteria, and threshold values if diagnostic criteria would be based on an odds ratio of 2.0. The evaluation of different screening strategies and different diagnostic criteria will allow to explore the most cost effective methods for identifying women at risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes and at high risk for the development of type 2 diabetes after pregnancy. By using a multivariable risk estimation model based on the most relevant clinical risk factors and biochemical measures for GDM in our own population, the aim is to develop a simple and cost effective screening algorithm.

This study will also allow to evaluate the best short-term follow up strategy postpartum for women with a previous history of GDM. Different screening tests will be used three months postpartum: a fasting plasma glucose, Hba1c and 75g OGTT.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gestational Diabetes Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

pregnant women without known diabetes

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women between 18-45 years,
* singleton pregnancy
* between 6-13 weeks of pregnancy
* the delivery has to be planned in the hospital where the study is performed.

Exclusion Criteria

* \< 18 years or \> 45 year
* multiple pregnancy
* known diabetes or taking metformin
* chronic treatment with corticoids
* signs of a miscarriage
* Chronic medical condition: uncontrolled hypertension, severe heart disease, severe chronic liver disease, severe chronic kidney disease, chronic infection (such as HIV or hepatitis)
* bariatric surgery
* delivery is planned in another center than the screening
* a normal follow up and treatment during pregnancy will not be possible (due to incompliance, psychiatric problems, severe communication problems…)
* participating in another study with any medication or intervention ( including life style intervention) up to 90 days before the start of the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The National Lottery

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

FWO clinical doctoral scholarship

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Novo Nordisk A/S

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sanofi

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Novartis

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Katrien Benhalima, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

OLV Aalst

Aalst, , Belgium

Site Status

UZA

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

OLV Aalst-site Asse

Asse, , Belgium

Site Status

Imelda Bonheiden

Bonheiden, , Belgium

Site Status

AZ St Jan

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

Kliniek St Jan Brussel

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

UZ Leuven

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Beunen K, Van den Abbeele F, Van Crombrugge P, Verhaeghe J, Vandeginste S, Verlaenen H, Maes T, Dufraimont E, Roggen N, De Block C, Jacquemyn Y, Mekahli F, De Clippel K, Van den Bruel A, Loccufier A, Laenen A, Devlieger R, Mathieu C, Benhalima K. Fetal size monitoring in women with gestational diabetes and normal glucose tolerance. Acta Diabetol. 2025 Jan;62(1):35-48. doi: 10.1007/s00592-024-02330-0. Epub 2024 Jul 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39031189 (View on PubMed)

Raets L, Vandewinkel M, Van Crombrugge P, Moyson C, Verhaeghe J, Vandeginste S, Verlaenen H, Vercammen C, Maes T, Dufraimont E, Roggen N, De Block C, Jacquemyn Y, Mekahli F, De Clippel K, Van Den Bruel A, Loccufier A, Laenen A, Devlieger R, Mathieu C, Benhalima K. Preference of Women for Gestational Diabetes Screening Method According to Tolerance of Tests and Population Characteristics. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 8;12:781384. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.781384. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34858350 (View on PubMed)

Minschart C, De Weerdt K, Elegeert A, Van Crombrugge P, Moyson C, Verhaeghe J, Vandeginste S, Verlaenen H, Vercammen C, Maes T, Dufraimont E, De Block C, Jacquemyn Y, Mekahli F, De Clippel K, Van Den Bruel A, Loccufier A, Laenen A, Devlieger R, Mathieu C, Benhalima K. Antenatal Depression and Risk of Gestational Diabetes, Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes, and Postpartum Quality of Life. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Jul 13;106(8):e3110-e3124. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab156.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33693709 (View on PubMed)

Benhalima K, Van Crombrugge P, Verhaeghe J, Vandeginste S, Verlaenen H, Vercammen C, Dufraimont E, De Block C, Jacquemyn Y, Mekahli F, De Clippel K, Devlieger R, Mathieu C. The Belgian Diabetes in Pregnancy Study (BEDIP-N), a multi-centric prospective cohort study on screening for diabetes in pregnancy and gestational diabetes: methodology and design. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jul 11;14:226. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-226.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25015413 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BEDIP-N study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.