Acetazolamide for the Prevention of High Altitude Illness: a Comparison of Dosing
NCT ID: NCT01993667
Last Updated: 2019-01-29
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
130 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-03-31
2016-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Three New Ideas to Protect Special Forces From the Stress of High Altitude
NCT02463357
Prevention of Acute Mountain Sickness by Intermittent Hypoxia
NCT00559832
Sex Differences in Sympathetic Vascular Reactivity at High Altitude
NCT05525416
Effect of High Altitude Exposure, Acclimatization and Re-exposure on Cerebral Autoregulation in Lowlanders
NCT02829255
The Effect of Chronic Nitrate Supplementation on Acute Mountain Sickness and Exercise Performance in Hypoxia
NCT03101904
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Current recommended dosing is 125 mg, orally twice daily, started 24 hours prior to ascending in elevation. Side effects include tingling of the fingers and toes and perioral numbness which may be erroneously interpreted as stroke symptoms. Since acetazolamide is a mild diuretic, frequent micturition may occur leading to interruption of daytime activities as well as broken sleep. These effects can affect safety at high altitude. Acetazolamide is normally discontinued 2 days after the user has reached their highest elevation or a plateau in elevation.
A lower dose may be just as effective in preventing high altitude illnesses while preventing the disconcerting side effects resulting from its use. A smaller dose has not been studied, however. We will compare the common dose of 125 mg twice daily with a lower dose of 62.5 mg twice daily.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Acetazolamide normal dose
Experimental : Acetazolamide 125 mg twice daily
Normal Dose Acetazolamide
Administration of normal dose acetazolamide
Acetazolamide low dose
Experimental: Acetazolamide 62.5 mg twice daily
Low Dose Acetazolamide
Administration of low dose acetazolamide
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Low Dose Acetazolamide
Administration of low dose acetazolamide
Normal Dose Acetazolamide
Administration of normal dose acetazolamide
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* English or Indian speaking
* Mountaineers or trekkers who plan to climb Mt. McKinley or trek to Base Camp on Mt. Everest
Exclusion Criteria
* Kidney disease or dysfunction
* Liver disease, dysfunction, or cirrhosis
* Suprarenal gland failure or dysfunction
* Hyperchloremic acidosis
* Angle-closure glaucoma
* Taking high dose aspirin (over 325 mg/day)
* Any reaction to sulfa drugs or acetazolamide
* Pregnant or lactating women
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Utah
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Scott McIntosh
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
McIntosh Scott, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Utah
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Utah Health Sciences Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
50402
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.