Assessing Contacts' Decision Making on Reducing the Risk of Pertussis Transmission to Newborns Through Immunisation

NCT ID: NCT01890447

Last Updated: 2017-01-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

676 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-31

Study Completion Date

2016-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to establish an effective method to inform parents or close relatives of newborns about the risk of pertussis transmission to newborns and the advantages offered by the cocooning strategy (vaccinating those who are in close contact with the newborn) by assessing the factors that affect the parents' decision-making to accept pertussis immunisation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Two phases are foreseen in the study. The 'questionnaire design' phase will be conducted in order to finalise the electronic questionnaire. The enrollment phase will involve the administration of the final web-based questionnaires to the subjects included in the enrollment phase.

The data generated in this study will be useful to inform parents of newborns about the advantages of vaccinating people who are in close contact with the newborn even before the baby is born in order to prevent the transmission of pertussis to the newborn.

No vaccine will be administered during this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pertussis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Questionnaire design group

A focus group (group of experts) such as physicians, nurses, or other professionals invited by the investigator.

Web-based survey questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

Data collection will be done via web-based questionnaires generated by Sawtooth Software. Subjects will be asked for their ideal alternative (acceptance to immunisation) by selecting the factors that suit them the most. The subjects are then presented several sets of alternatives built around their ideal choice.

Adaptive questionnaire group

Adults who are contacts of newborns or expecting mothers in their last trimester of pregnancy or their partners. The data of the subjects in this group will be analysed using the adaptive choice based conjoint (ACBC) technique.

Web-based survey questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

Data collection will be done via web-based questionnaires generated by Sawtooth Software. Subjects will be asked for their ideal alternative (acceptance to immunisation) by selecting the factors that suit them the most. The subjects are then presented several sets of alternatives built around their ideal choice.

Standard questionnaire group

Adults who are contacts of newborns or expecting mothers in their last trimester of pregnancy or their partners. The data of the subjects in this group will be analysed using the standard discrete choice experiment (DCE) technique.

Web-based survey questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

Data collection will be done via web-based questionnaires generated by Sawtooth Software. Subjects will be asked for their ideal alternative (acceptance to immunisation) by selecting the factors that suit them the most. The subjects are then presented several sets of alternatives built around their ideal choice.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Web-based survey questionnaire

Data collection will be done via web-based questionnaires generated by Sawtooth Software. Subjects will be asked for their ideal alternative (acceptance to immunisation) by selecting the factors that suit them the most. The subjects are then presented several sets of alternatives built around their ideal choice.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects who the investigator believes that, can and will comply with the requirements of this protocol (ability to understand the study objectives and the questions asked, and ability to operate a computer).
* Written informed consent obtained from the subject.
* Subjects aged ≥ 18 years at the time of study start who are either:

Contacts of newborns (aged ≤ 6 months). OR Expecting mothers in their last trimester of pregnancy or their partners, who will be in close contact with the newborn.

• Subjects who will be eligible for pertussis booster vaccination and have not received any pertussis vaccination in the last 2 years (before study start).

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects who have participated in the 'questionnaire design' phase (applicable only for subjects who will participate in the enrollment phase of the study).
* Subjects with a contraindication to pertussis vaccination.
* Subjects who declare to be in principle against vaccination.
* Subjects who declare to be in a chronic physical condition and not compatible with vaccination.
* Subjects with a history of pertussis in the last 5 years (before study start).
* History of non-response to pertussis vaccination.
* Subjects with mental deficiency.
* Subjects with unstable chronic health condition(s).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GlaxoSmithKline

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

GSK Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

GlaxoSmithKline

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

GSK Investigational Site

San Severo (FG), Apulia, Italy

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Chiavari, Liguria, Italy

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Cuneo, Piedmont, Italy

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Ragusa (RG), Sicily, Italy

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Getafe/Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Leioa( Vizcaya), , Spain

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Pamplona, , Spain

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Parla, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

116964

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccination in Pregnancy
NCT01698346 COMPLETED PHASE4
Pertussis Vaccination in Pregnant Women
NCT03909126 COMPLETED PHASE4