A Trial Comparing Two Pertussis-containing Vaccines in Pregnancy and Vaccine Responses in UK Mothers and Their Infants
NCT ID: NCT02145624
Last Updated: 2020-10-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
366 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-10-31
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Vaccination of pregnant women with whooping cough vaccine in the third trimester of pregnancy was instigated nationally, so that antibodies produced by the Mum would cross the placenta to the unborn child, giving them passive protection at the most vulnerable time. This antibody transfer has been known for some time but has not been compared between the two whooping cough vaccines being used in pregnancy. Any effect the raised antibody might have on infant responses to the vaccines given in the first few months of life has also not been measured. This is particularly important as the infant immunisations include some of the same components as the whooping cough vaccines, which include diphtheria, tetanus and polio. Previous studies have shown that high levels of antibody prior to vaccination may affect subsequent antibody responses. It is therefore important to assess whether administration of the whooping cough vaccine in pregnancy adversely affects the protection afforded by the infant vaccines, particularly to those which are similar, namely tetanus and diphtheria as well as meningitis C and Hib vaccines which include diptheria and tetanus components in their structures. This study will assess immune responses of mothers and their babies (\~200 pairs) to their vaccinations and will allow the comparison of two whooping cough vaccines being used in pregnancy. This will be done by taking small amounts of blood, which is the only way to measure antibody levels (the proxy of the immune response), before and after the vaccinations. A group of unvaccinated women and their babies (50 pairs) will also be recruited to allow comparison of their immune responses.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Optimising the Timing of Whooping Cough Immunisation in MUMs
NCT03908164
Vaccine Responses in Infants After Acellular Pertussis Vaccination During Pregnancy in Thailand
NCT02408926
Effectiveness of Maternal Immunization With Boostrix at Preventing Pertussis Among Infants <2 Months Old in the United States
NCT03973905
Boostrix® Pregnancy Registry
NCT02096276
Gambia Pertussis Study (GaPs)
NCT03606096
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Repevax
Repevax in pregnancy
Repevax
vaccine
Boostrix-IPV
Boostrix-IPV in pregnancy
Boostrix-IPV
vaccine
unvaccinated
unvaccinated mothers
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Repevax
vaccine
Boostrix-IPV
vaccine
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
• are aged 1645 years Infants of the women recruited will also be seen during the study. They will be given their immunisations according to the routine childhood immunisation schedule and will have blood samples collected as detailed in the clinical procedures section of this form. Their inclusion/ exclusion will be as per the Green Book recommendations by the UK Dept of Health.
Exclusion Criteria
All women:
* Bleeding disorder
* Receipt of any pertussis containing vaccine in the previous 12 months
Women to be vaccinated only (i.e. not the control group):
* Received immunoglobulin or other blood product within the preceding 3 months
* Fulfil any of the contraindications to vaccination specified in The Green Book on Immunisation (https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/publichealthenglan d/series/immunisationagainstinfectiousdiseasethegreenbook), including:
* A confirmed anaphylactic reaction to a previous dose of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis or poliomyelitis containing vaccine
* A confirmed anaphylactic reaction to any component of the vaccine
* A confirmed anaphylactic reaction to a previous dose of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis or poliomyelitis containing vaccine
16 Years
45 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institute of Child Health
OTHER
St George's, University of London
OTHER
Public Health England
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elizabeth Coates, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Public Health England
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Gloucestershire
Gloucestershire, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom
Hertfordshire
Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
St George's Vaccine Institute
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Grassly NC, Andrews N, Cooper G, Stephens L, Waight P, Jones CE, Heath PT, Calvert A, Southern J, Martin J, Miller E. Effect of maternal immunisation with multivalent vaccines containing inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) on infant IPV immune response: A phase 4, multi-centre randomised trial. Vaccine. 2023 Feb 10;41(7):1299-1302. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.035. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
Jones CE, Calvert A, Southern J, Matheson M, Andrews N, Khalil A, Cuthbertson H, Hallis B, England A, Heath PT, Miller E. A phase IV, multi-centre, randomized clinical trial comparing two pertussis-containing vaccines in pregnant women in England and vaccine responses in their infants. BMC Med. 2021 Jun 8;19(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02005-5.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
iMAP2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.