Improving Symptom Management for Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers Through Internet

NCT ID: NCT01867723

Last Updated: 2015-10-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

560 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-04-30

Study Completion Date

2015-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Being diagnosed and treated for cancer is usually associated with severe side effects and symptoms. Cancer patients can have difficulty to manage the symptoms as a result of treatment which may cause i) an interruption or cessation of cancer treatment ii) can have a negative impact on patients' quality of life (QoL). Family caregivers (FCs) of cancer patients are often the primary source of social and emotional support for patients, and play major roles in how well patients manage with the consequences of illness and treatment. Thus, FCs are clinically important, since supporting FCs indirectly supports patients.

To help both cancer patients and their FCs to manage their symptoms, our center has developed WebChoice now called Connect, an internet based support system that extends traditional health services into cancer patients' homes. Connect provides individualized symptom management support, illness relevant information, and communication with a clinical nurse specialist in cancer care, as well as with other cancer patients and their FCs over the Internet. The objectives of this interdisciplinary research project are to test main and interaction effects of providing Connect to patients, to FCs or both simultaneously on 1) primary patient outcomes in terms of symptom distress, QoL, depression, fatigue and sleep 2) Primary FC outcomes in terms of symptom distress, QoL, depression, fatigue, sleep and FC burden 3) Secondary, or intermediate, patient and FC outcomes in terms of self-efficacy social support, and self-reported health care utilization.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cancer patients often experience multiple symptoms due to the illness itself and its treatment. Failure to detect and relieve patients' symptoms can have deleterious effects on patients \[1\]. To adequately help patients, it is important to understand how symptoms vary and co-vary during different phases of patients' illness trajectory. A major limitation in previous studies of symptoms in patients undergoing cancer treatment is that they have not evaluated symptom changes over time during and how changes in one or more symptom influence patients QoL. Furthermore, compelling evidence exist that cancer patients do not receive adequate symptom management or palliative care during the course of their illness \[2-4\].

A barrier to appropriate symptom management is the lack of interventions that support patients effectively in symptom management and self-management. Within the current health system, patients get limited help with their symptoms and health problems. This problem is accentuated by short hospital stays or consultations. Side-effects of treatment usually are at their worst after discharge from the hospital, and patients spend most of the time at home, leaving them with considerable symptom distress without much assistance. To overcome these problems, the Center for Shared Decision Making (CSDM) and Collaborative Care Research at Olso University Hospital (OUS) has developed WebChoice now called Connect, an Internet based support system that extends traditional health services into cancer patients' homes. Connect provides individualized symptom management support, illness relevant information, and communication with a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) in cancer care, as well as with other cancer patients over the Internet. v has been tested in an RCT funded by the Norwegian Cancer Society with breast and prostate cancer patients nationwide. Results from this RCT and other previous studies on Connect components demonstrate significant improvements in patient-centered care \[5-7\] and patient outcomes in terms of less symptom distress of depression. Also patients with access to WebChoice maintained self-efficacy and health related quality of life over time while the control group deteriorated significantly. (under review). Therefore, an important next step and aim of this study is to expand and test Connect in the following, to benefit a larger group of patients.

Research has repeatedly shown that FCs of cancer patients experience many problems, symptoms and burden \[8\]. However, the relationship between patient and FCs symptoms and problems is not yet sufficiently understood. Affecting one may also affect the other, and interventions that support FCs could also support patients and vice versa, reducing symptom distress \[9\]. Therefore, we will extend Connect to support cancer patients and their FCs, and test its effects on patient and FC outcomes.

Thus the specific aims for Phase II of this project are to:

1\. Develop and test the effects of an extended Connect module to support (1) cancer patients and (2) their FCs on patient and FC outcomes.

Research Questions:

Following cancer patients and their FCs with 3 repeated measures over 6 months, this study will test main and interaction effects of providing Connect to patients, to FCs or both simultaneously on:

* Primary patient outcomes in terms of symptom distress, HRQoL, depression, fatigue and sleep.
* Primary FC outcomes in terms of symptom distress, QoL, depression, fatigue, sleep and care giver burden.
* Secondary, or intermediate, patient and FC outcomes in terms of self-efficacy, social support, and self-reported health care utilization.
* To better understand how these effects may occur, we will explore relationships between primary patient and FC outcomes; and how primary and secondary outcomes vary and co-vary across experimental conditions. Additional research questions are:
* How do patients and FCs use Connect? What is the frequency of use and which components are most used?
* What are patients' and FCs perceptions of usefulness and ease of use of Connect?

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fatigue

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Internet communication application

Experiment 1 Effect of internet support program on cancer patients and their caregivers

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Internet communication application

Intervention Type OTHER

Intervention 1 Effect of internet support program will be tested on cancer patients and their family caregivers No intervention

Control group

Control group get usual care

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Internet communication application

Intervention 1 Effect of internet support program will be tested on cancer patients and their family caregivers No intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* diagnosed and treated for cancer;
* \> 18 years of age,
* able to read/write/speak Norwegian,
* written informed consent, and
* have a FC who is willing to participate. FCs will be the individual the patient identifies as being most involved in their care.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients received cranial radiation or who have brain metastasis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Oslo University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Oslo University Hospital

Center for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cornelia Ruland, PHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Oslo University Hospital- Raikshospitalet

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Oslo University Hospital

Oslo, Oslo County, Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sygna K, Johansen S, Ruland CM. Recruitment challenges in clinical research including cancer patients and their caregivers. A randomized controlled trial study and lessons learned. Trials. 2015 Sep 25;16:428. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0948-y.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26407547 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

6.2008.547

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cancer Fatigue Education Program
NCT01278147 COMPLETED NA