Evaluation of a Social-networking Intervention to Reduce Cancer-related Distress
NCT ID: NCT01976949
Last Updated: 2014-05-22
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
347 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2009-07-31
Study Completion Date
2014-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
It is hypothesized that the treatment group will show greater improvements in quality of life and mood disturbance compared to the control group and that greater levels of engagement with the intervention materials will be associated with greater improvements in mood and quality of life.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Novel Prosocial Online Support Group for Distressed Breast Cancer Survivors
NCT01396174
Breast Neoplasms
COMPLETED
NA
Online and Narrative Interventions for Advanced Cancer Patients
NCT00948207
Metastatic Cancer
COMPLETED
NA
Digital Connections: an EHealth Group Intervention for Young Adult Cancer Survivors
NCT05952492
Cancer
COMPLETED
NA
Evaluating Procedures for a Study of the AYA Survivors Coping and Emotional Needs Toolkit
NCT06420193
Depression
Cancer
Adolescent
+2 more
COMPLETED
NA
Developing and Pre-Testing an eHealth Group Intervention for Young Adult Cancer Survivors
NCT05054569
Cancer
COMPLETED
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Individuals with cancer face an array of psychosocial needs, and it has been estimated that up to 35% of cancer survivors experience clinically-significant levels of distress. Psychosocial interventions may be effective for improving quality of life and reducing levels of mood disturbance in these patients. Unfortunately, barriers to accessing psychosocial intervention are common, and many are unable to access those services. Internet- based psychosocial interventions improve accessibility of care and offer additional methodological advantages, including the ability to easily collect self-report data, track exposure to the intervention, and evaluate effects of specific intervention components. The proposed study will evaluate whether a website developed specifically for providing psychological treatment and enhancing communication between cancer survivors can improve distress among cancer survivors who indicate that they have high levels of distress. If successful, the study will also provide valuable information needed to improve the treatment and to adequately conduct a larger trial comparing internet-based and face-to-face treatments.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Cancer Survivors With Clinically Significant Distress
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Primary Study Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Blinding Strategy
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Social-networking intervention
Individuals interested in participating in the study will be randomized to receive access to a 12-week internet-based treatment group. Subjects assigned to the treatment group will have access to a group discussion board, a structured 12-week coping-skills training course, professional facilitation of the group, a real-time chat board, and personal profiles established by other group members. Subjects will be asked to complete online self-report measures of distress, mood disturbance, and quality of life at baseline and again after participation in the 12-week group.
Group Type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
online social-networking intervention
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
Control group
12 week wait-list control subjects will be able to join a group after they complete the 12-week assessment and will be asked to complete a 24-week assessment in order to measure change over time. Subjects will have access to a group discussion board, a structured 12-week coping-skills training course, professional facilitation of the group, a real-time chat board, and personal profiles established by other group members. Subjects will be asked to complete online self-report measures of distress, mood disturbance, and quality of life at baseline and again after participation in the 12-week group.
Group Type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
online social-networking intervention
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
online social-networking intervention
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. at least 18 years of age,
2. previous cancer diagnosis other than non-melanoma skin cancer,
4\) fluent in English, 5) routine access to the Internet, and 6) presence of greater than mild distress as identified by having distress greater than or equal to 4 on initial screening with the Distress Thermometer
2. previous cancer diagnosis other than non-melanoma skin cancer,
4\) fluent in English, 5) routine access to the Internet, and 6) presence of greater than mild distress as identified by having distress greater than or equal to 4 on initial screening with the Distress Thermometer
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
NIH
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Loma Linda University
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jason Owen, Phd.
Associate Professor
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jason E Owen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Loma Linda University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Loma Linda University
Loma Linda, California, United States
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
United States
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Allen SM, Shah AC, Nezu AM, Nezu CM, Ciambrone D, Hogan J, Mor V. A problem-solving approach to stress reduction among younger women with breast carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 2002 Jun 15;94(12):3089-100. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10586.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Austenfeld JL, Stanton AL. Coping through emotional approach: a new look at emotion, coping, and health-related outcomes. J Pers. 2004 Dec;72(6):1335-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00299.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Baker F, Denniston M, Zabora J, Polland A, Dudley WN. A POMS short form for cancer patients: psychometric and structural evaluation. Psychooncology. 2002 Jul-Aug;11(4):273-81. doi: 10.1002/pon.564.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bantum EO, Owen JE. Evaluating the validity of computerized content analysis programs for identification of emotional expression in cancer narratives. Psychol Assess. 2009 Mar;21(1):79-88. doi: 10.1037/a0014643.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Beskow LM, Sandler RS, Weinberger M. Research recruitment through US central cancer registries: balancing privacy and scientific issues. Am J Public Health. 2006 Nov;96(11):1920-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.061556. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Beskow LM, Millikan RC, Sandler RS, Godley PA, Weiner BJ, Weinberger M. The effect of physician permission versus notification on research recruitment through cancer registries (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2006 Apr;17(3):315-23. doi: 10.1007/s10552-005-0521-1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996 Jul;37(1):53-72. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Carlson LE, Angen M, Cullum J, Goodey E, Koopmans J, Lamont L, MacRae JH, Martin M, Pelletier G, Robinson J, Simpson JS, Speca M, Tillotson L, Bultz BD. High levels of untreated distress and fatigue in cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2004 Jun 14;90(12):2297-304. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601887.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Carmack Taylor CL, Kulik J, Badr H, Smith M, Basen-Engquist K, Penedo F, Gritz ER. A social comparison theory analysis of group composition and efficacy of cancer support group programs. Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jul;65(2):262-73. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.024. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, Silberman M, Yellen SB, Winicour P, Brannon J, et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Mar;11(3):570-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.570.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cheshire C, Antin A. (2008). The social psychological effects of feedback on the production of Internet information pools. J Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 705-27.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cunningham AJ, Edmonds CV, Jenkins GP, Pollack H, Lockwood GA, Warr D. A randomized controlled trial of the effects of group psychological therapy on survival in women with metastatic breast cancer. Psychooncology. 1998 Nov-Dec;7(6):508-17. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199811/12)7:63.0.CO;2-7.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Edwards AG, Hailey S, Maxwell M. Psychological interventions for women with metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(2):CD004253. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004253.pub2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A. (1996). G*Power: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research, Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 1-11.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Fawzy FI, Fawzy NW. A structured psychoeducational intervention for cancer patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1994 May;16(3):149-92. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(94)90098-1. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Folkman S, Greer S. Promoting psychological well-being in the face of serious illness: when theory, research and practice inform each other. Psychooncology. 2000 Jan-Feb;9(1):11-9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1611(200001/02)9:13.0.co;2-z.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Fonteyn M, Bauer-Wu S. Using qualitative evaluation in a feasibility study to improve and refine a complementary therapy intervention prior to subsequent research. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2005 Nov;11(4):247-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2005.05.007. Epub 2005 Nov 2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Fukui S, Kugaya A, Kamiya M, Koike M, Okamura H, Nakanishi T, Wenner M, Imoto S, Kanagawa K, Uchitomi Y. Participation in psychosocial group intervention among Japanese women with primary breast cancer and its associated factors. Psychooncology. 2001 Sep-Oct;10(5):419-27. doi: 10.1002/pon.534.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ganz PA, Kwan L, Stanton AL, Krupnick JL, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Bower JE, Belin TR. Quality of life at the end of primary treatment of breast cancer: first results from the moving beyond cancer randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Mar 3;96(5):376-87. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh060.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Graves KD. Social cognitive theory and cancer patients' quality of life: a meta-analysis of psychosocial intervention components. Health Psychol. 2003 Mar;22(2):210-9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gustafson DH, Wise M, McTavish F, et al. (1993). Development and pilot evaluation of a computer-based support system for women with breast cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol, 11, 69-93.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gustafson DH, McTavish F, Hawkins R, Pingree S, Arora N, Mendenhall J, Simmons GE. Computer support for elderly women with breast cancer. JAMA. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1305. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1305. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gustafson DH, Hawkins R, Pingree S, McTavish F, Arora NK, Mendenhall J, Cella DF, Serlin RC, Apantaku FM, Stewart J, Salner A. Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Jul;16(7):435-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016007435.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Boberg EW, McTavish F, Owens B, Wise M, Berhe H, Pingree S. CHESS: 10 years of research and development in consumer health informatics for broad populations, including the underserved. Int J Med Inform. 2002 Nov 12;65(3):169-77. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(02)00048-5.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hann D, Winter K, Jacobsen P. Measurement of depressive symptoms in cancer patients: evaluation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). J Psychosom Res. 1999 May;46(5):437-43. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(99)00004-5.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hartoonian N, Ormseth S, Bantum EO, Owen JE. (2008). Process and outcome evaluation of a social- networking website for health promotion. Ann Behav Med, 35s, 63.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Helgeson VS, Cohen S, Schulz R, Yasko J. Group support interventions for women with breast cancer: who benefits from what? Health Psychol. 2000 Mar;19(2):107-14. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.19.2.107.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Helgeson VS, Lepore SJ, Eton DT. Moderators of the benefits of psychoeducational interventions for men with prostate cancer. Health Psychol. 2006 May;25(3):348-54. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.3.348.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hewitt M, Rowland JH. Mental health service use among adult cancer survivors: analyses of the National Health Interview Survey. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Dec 1;20(23):4581-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.03.077.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hilarius DL, Kloeg PH, Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Aaronson NK. Level of agreement between patient self-report and observer ratings of health-related quality of life communication in oncology. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Jan;65(1):95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.002. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hsu J, Huang J, Kinsman J, Fireman B, Miller R, Selby J, Ortiz E. Use of e-Health services between 1999 and 2002: a growing digital divide. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Mar-Apr;12(2):164-71. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1672. Epub 2004 Nov 23.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) National Cancer Policy Board; Hewitt M, Herdman R, Holland J, editors. Meeting Psychosocial Needs of Women with Breast Cancer. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2004. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK215943/
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Jacobsen PB, Meade CD, Stein KD, Chirikos TN, Small BJ, Ruckdeschel JC. Efficacy and costs of two forms of stress management training for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jun 15;20(12):2851-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.08.301.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Jacobsen PB, Donovan KA, Trask PC, Fleishman SB, Zabora J, Baker F, Holland JC. Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer. 2005 Apr 1;103(7):1494-502. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20940.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Jacobsen P, Donovan K, Swaine Z, Watson I. (2006). Management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients: Toward an evidence-based approach. In Oncology: An evidence-based approach. A. Chang, P. Ganz, D. Hayes, T. Kinsella, H. Pass, J. Schiller, R. Stone, V. Strecher (Eds.). New York: Springer-Verlag, p. 1552-1579.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kwekkeboom KL. Outcome expectancy and success with cognitive-behavioral interventions: the case of guided imagery. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001 Aug;28(7):1125-32.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lazarus RS, Folkman S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lee V, Robin Cohen S, Edgar L, Laizner AM, Gagnon AJ. Meaning-making intervention during breast or colorectal cancer treatment improves self-esteem, optimism, and self-efficacy. Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jun;62(12):3133-45. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.041. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lieberman MA, Golant M, Giese-Davis J, Winzlenberg A, Benjamin H, Humphreys K, Kronenwetter C, Russo S, Spiegel D. Electronic support groups for breast carcinoma: a clinical trial of effectiveness. Cancer. 2003 Feb 15;97(4):920-5. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11145.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Liess A, Simon W, Yutsis M, Owen JE, Piemme KA, Golant M, Giese-Davis J. Detecting emotional expression in face-to-face and online breast cancer support groups. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Jun;76(3):517-23. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.76.3.517.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Badia Llach X, Herdman M, Schiaffino A. Determining correspondence between scores on the EQ-5D "thermometer" and a 5-point categorical rating scale. Med Care. 1999 Jul;37(7):671-7. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199907000-00007.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Meyer TJ, Mark MM. Effects of psychosocial interventions with adult cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized experiments. Health Psychol. 1995 Mar;14(2):101-8. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.14.2.101.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Newell SA, Sanson-Fisher RW, Savolainen NJ. Systematic review of psychological therapies for cancer patients: overview and recommendations for future research. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Apr 17;94(8):558-84. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.8.558.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Nezu AM, Nezu CM, Friedman SH, Faddis S, Houts PS. (1998). Helping cancer patients cope: A problem- solving approach. Washinton, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Overcash J, Extermann M, Parr J, Perry J, Balducci L. Validity and reliability of the FACT-G scale for use in the older person with cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2001 Dec;24(6):591-6. doi: 10.1097/00000421-200112000-00013.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Owen JE, Klapow JC, Hicken B, Tucker DC. Psychosocial interventions for cancer: review and analysis using a three-tiered outcomes model. Psychooncology. 2001 May-Jun;10(3):218-30. doi: 10.1002/pon.509.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Owen JE, Yarbrough EJ, Vaga A, Tucker DC. (2003). Investigation of the effects of gender and preparation on quality of communication in Internet support groups. Comp Hum Behav, 19, 259-75.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Owen JE, Klapow JC, Roth DL, Nabell L, Tucker DC. Improving the effectiveness of adjuvant psychological treatment for women with breast cancer: the feasibility of providing online support. Psychooncology. 2004 Apr;13(4):281-92. doi: 10.1002/pon.733.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Owen JE, Klapow JC, Roth DL, Shuster JL Jr, Bellis J, Meredith R, Tucker DC. Randomized pilot of a self-guided internet coping group for women with early-stage breast cancer. Ann Behav Med. 2005 Aug;30(1):54-64. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3001_7.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Owen JE, Giese-Davis J, Cordova M, Kronenwetter C, Golant M, Spiegel D. Self-report and linguistic indicators of emotional expression in narratives as predictors of adjustment to cancer. J Behav Med. 2006 Aug;29(4):335-45. doi: 10.1007/s10865-006-9061-8. Epub 2006 Jul 15.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Owen JE, Goldstein MS, Lee JH, Breen N, Rowland JH. Use of health-related and cancer-specific support groups among adult cancer survivors. Cancer. 2007 Jun 15;109(12):2580-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22719.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pennebaker JW, Francis ME. (2001). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pew Internet and American Life Project (2003). How Californians compare to the rest of the nation. PIP: Washington, D.C.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2007). E-patients with a disability or chronic disease. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/EPatients_Chronic_Conditions_2007.pdf, last accessed on 1/16/08.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Radloff LS. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. App Psychol Measures, 1, 385-401.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rehse B, Pukrop R. Effects of psychosocial interventions on quality of life in adult cancer patients: meta analysis of 37 published controlled outcome studies. Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Jun;50(2):179-86. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00149-0.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Roth AJ, Kornblith AB, Batel-Copel L, Peabody E, Scher HI, Holland JC. Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma: a pilot study. Cancer. 1998 May 15;82(10):1904-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980515)82:103.0.co;2-x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Shacham S. A shortened version of the Profile of Mood States. J Pers Assess. 1983 Jun;47(3):305-6. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4703_14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Spiegel D, Classen C. (2000). Group therapy for cancer patients: A research-based handbook of psychosocial care. New York: Basic Books.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Stanton AL, Kirk SB, Cameron CL, Danoff-Burg S. Coping through emotional approach: scale construction and validation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Jun;78(6):1150-69. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.6.1150.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Stanton AL, Danoff-Burg S, Sworowski LA, Collins CA, Branstetter AD, Rodriguez-Hanley A, Kirk SB, Austenfeld JL. Randomized, controlled trial of written emotional expression and benefit finding in breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Oct 15;20(20):4160-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.08.521.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Vilela LD, Nicolau B, Mahmud S, Edgar L, Hier M, Black M, Franco EL, Allison PJ. Comparison of psychosocial outcomes in head and neck cancer patients receiving a coping strategies intervention and control subjects receiving no intervention. J Otolaryngol. 2006 Apr;35(2):88-96. doi: 10.2310/7070.2005.5002.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Watts S, Edgar L. Nucare, a coping skills training intervention for oncology patients and families: participants' motivations and expectations. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2004 Spring;14(2):84-95. English, French.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Weiss D, Marmar C. (1997). The Impact of Event Scale - Revised. In J. Wilson & T. Keane (Eds), Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD. New York: Guilford Press.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Winzelberg AJ, Classen C, Alpers GW, Roberts H, Koopman C, Adams RE, Ernst H, Dev P, Taylor CB. Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer. Cancer. 2003 Mar 1;97(5):1164-73. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11174.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S. The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology. 2001 Jan-Feb;10(1):19-28. doi: 10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:13.0.co;2-6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Owen JE, O'Carroll Bantum E, Pagano IS, Stanton A. Randomized Trial of a Social Networking Intervention for Cancer-Related Distress. Ann Behav Med. 2017 Oct;51(5):661-672. doi: 10.1007/s12160-017-9890-4.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
http://www.health-space.net
Study website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PA06-225
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
57065
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
mHealth for Young Adult Cancer Survivors
NCT05905250
COMPLETED
NA
Positive Changes in Quality of Life of Older Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers
NCT00769249
WITHDRAWN
The Effectiveness of an Online Support Group in Enhancing Recovery Identity and Health-Related Quality of Life
NCT06145295
COMPLETED
NA
Effectiveness on Family Cohesion and Happiness of Using Social Media to Enhance Happiness Accounts for Late-Stage Cancer Patients and Their Families
NCT06559917
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Remote Physical Activity Programming to Improve Outcomes in Cancer Survivors With and Without Type 2 Diabetes
NCT06725953
RECRUITING
NA
Activating Happiness in Cancer: A Positive Psychology Workshop for Patients, Survivors, and Caregivers
NCT03569657
COMPLETED
NA
Promotion of Well-being of Young Adult Brain Cancer Survivors
NCT03871686
COMPLETED
NA
Understanding the Psychosocial Needs of Parents Who Have Lost a Child to Cancer
NCT00968500
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Online Psychosocial Cancer Screening, Monitoring and Stepped Treatment in Cancer Survivors
NCT04372459
COMPLETED
NA
Web-based Collaborative Care Intervention Study
NCT02939755
COMPLETED
NA
Harnessing Generativity Among Young Adult Cancer Survivors
NCT04272346
COMPLETED
NA
Activity Based Program to Improve Quality of Life Outcomes in Women Diagnosed With Cancer
NCT02761824
COMPLETED
NA
My Wellbeing Guide: a Novel Tool for Managing Stress and Improving Quality of Life
NCT05369429
RECRUITING
NA
E-health Intervention for Cancer Survivors
NCT01114802
COMPLETED
PHASE1
An Internet-based Program to Help Cancer Survivors Manage Pain
NCT04462302
RECRUITING
NA
Emotion Regulation and Cancer Caregiving
NCT06123416
COMPLETED
Adolescent Survivors of Cancer or Similar Illnesses
NCT00579631
COMPLETED
Reducing Emotional Distress, Enhancing Function and Improving Network Engagement in Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology
NCT02495376
COMPLETED
NA
Assessing the Patient Experience in Cancer Care
NCT01621295
COMPLETED
Self-help Program Via Internet for Adolescents With Cancer
NCT01510236
WITHDRAWN
PHASE2
A Digital Art Activity to Enhance Self-Disclosure and the Detection of Psycho-social Distress in Adult Cancer Patients
NCT06127121
RECRUITING
The Effect of a Combined Lifestyle Intervention for Patients With Cancer on Quality of Life
NCT07110753
RECRUITING
NA
Effects of Internet Support for Cancer Patients
NCT00971009
COMPLETED
NA
Project Connect Online: An Internet-based Intervention for Women With Breast Cancer
NCT02866994
COMPLETED
NA
Survivors Uniting for Remote Guided Exercise
NCT07290309
RECRUITING
NA