Improved Function and Quality of Life for Older Patients Receiving Radiotherapy, Part II

NCT ID: NCT03881137

Last Updated: 2022-11-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

178 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-08

Study Completion Date

2022-06-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This cluster randomized controlled pilot study is designed to test the feasibility, and potential effect of a multicomponent, community-based intervention aiming to improve quality of life (QoL) and function for older patients receiving radiotherapy (RT), and thereby reduce the needs for professional help. The intervention will be based on geriatric assessment and management (GAM), i.e. systematic assessment and management of physical, mental and functional problems frequently occurring in the elderly. It will target individual patients according to needs and be carried out in collaboration between hospital and community services from start of RT until 8 weeks post-treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background:

Older cancer patients (\> 65 years) represent the majority of the cancer population, and their number grows due to an aging population. These patients often present with a multiplicity of problems. They frequently suffer from physical- or mental health comorbidities, and are often frail with impairment in mobility, daily life functioning and cognition. When diagnosed with cancer and in need of therapy, they are at substantial risk of complications and functional decline.

Geriatric assessment with management (GAM) has documented success in improving outcomes in older patients with other diseases than cancer. Thus, GAM is strongly recommended as an approach to optimize treatment and care for older cancer patients. Evidence for the potential benefits is still scarce and in particular for older patients receiving radiotherapy.

Although GAM has been proven successful in other contexts, there is no universally accepted recipe for how such an intervention should be performed and implemented. To be feasible and efficient, adjustments according to patient population, health care organization and available resources are necessary. The present study will be conducted to provide the evidence needed for a subsequent definitive evaluation of a GAM intervention for older patients receiving radiotherapy in a larger RTC, aiming at improving quality of life (QoL) and function, and thereby reduce the burden for the patients, their families and the society.

The detailed objectives are to:

1. assess the potential short- and long-term effect of the intervention on global QoL and physical functioning for older cancer patients receiving RT
2. assess the feasibility of the intervention

1. at the patient level (recruitment, compliance and adherence)
2. at the organizational level (structures facilitating or impeding implementation and collaboration across sectors and between professionals)
3. study the use of health care services and related costs in the intervention and control group

Methods:

The study emerges from Innlandet Hospital Trust and will be conducted in cooperation with Trondheim University Hospital, and 30 municipalities in the catchment area of Innlandet Hospital Trust, and Trondheim Municipality. The intervention is developed by an interdisciplinary, experienced research group in close collaboration with user representatives, hospital- and primary health care professionals. It is based on experience, results and preliminary results from foregoing studies by our study group (including NCT03071640 and NCT01742442) and focus group interviews with health professionals.

The design is cluster-randomized, randomizing municipalities and city districts. Patients will be recruited at the radiotherapy units at Innlandet Hospital Trust (primary study center) and Trondheim University Hospital (second study center). Anticipated number of participants from the two hospitals is 102 patients and 60 patients, respectively.

Eligible, consenting patients will be included by the start of radiotherapy (RT), and enter the control or intervention groups in accordance with the assignment of the municipality or city district in which they reside. They will be followed with study specific assessments for one year after end of RT, and for survival for five years.

Assessments:

By the time of inclusion, demographic and medical characteristics (including cancer diagnosis, stage of disease, former and ongoing tumor treatment, ECOG performance status, RT treatment aim (palliative or curative), and comorbidity. Detailed information about the RT schedule will be registered by the end of RT.

Patient reported outcomes (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L) will be assessed at baseline, by the end of RT, and thereafter 4, 8, 16, 32 and 52 weeks after RT. Physical performance tests, i.e. Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Timed Up and Go (TUG), grip strength and one-legged balance test, will be applied at baseline and 8 and 16 weeks after the end of RT. Cognitive function will be tested at baseline using the MiniCog.

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the intervention in comparison to control (standard care), detailed information on the patients' use of health care services (home based and institutional care) will be registered throughout the intervention period and during follow-up (one year, week 52).

Feasibility will be assessed by a process evaluation, aiming to identify facilitators and barriers for a successful implementation, using mixed methodology. Measures recommended for each patient's intervention plan will be consecutively registered, as will patients' compliance and adherence through weekly contact with the coordinating nurse (log notes). Further data will include interviews with patients and providers. Questionnaires to involved primary health care nurses and other relevant professionals will also be applied.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cancer Radiotherapy Older Patients

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The present study is a controlled cluster-randomized pilot study. Cluster-randomization is chosen to avoid contamination of the control group. Before patient recruitment commences, a selection of 32 municipalities and city districts (= clusters) will be stratified into blocks in accordance with number of inhabitants. The selection will include city districts, large and smaller municipalities to ensure sample size and representativity. Clusters within each block will be randomly assigned to intervention or control by using a computer-generated code, 1:1, i.e. 16 in each group

Eligible, consenting patients from municipalities/city districts randomized to control will enter the control group. Eligible, consenting patients from municipalities randomized to intervention will enter the intervention group
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention

Geriatric assessment with management

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Geriatric assessment with management

Intervention Type OTHER

A multicomponent intervention, carried out in cooperation between hospital and community services, based on a geriatric assessment (GA) followed by individually adapted measures targeting identified needs.

The GA and the start of the intervention will be handled by a PhD student (geriatrician) or project cancer nurse at start of RT. Pre-planned guidelines will be followed. Contribution from relevant hospital professionals will be sought according to needs. Then the intervention will be offered in the primary health care taking advantage of existing services, e.g. home care, rehabilitation services, exercise groups etc. A community-based coordinating nurse will follow the patients with weekly contacts throughout RT and to end of intervention 8 weeks post-RT. To ensure that each patient's intervention is properly adjusted to changing needs, repeated clinical assessments will be performed by the end of RT and 4 weeks post-RT.

Control

Patients receiving supportive care and follow up according to routine practice

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Geriatric assessment with management

A multicomponent intervention, carried out in cooperation between hospital and community services, based on a geriatric assessment (GA) followed by individually adapted measures targeting identified needs.

The GA and the start of the intervention will be handled by a PhD student (geriatrician) or project cancer nurse at start of RT. Pre-planned guidelines will be followed. Contribution from relevant hospital professionals will be sought according to needs. Then the intervention will be offered in the primary health care taking advantage of existing services, e.g. home care, rehabilitation services, exercise groups etc. A community-based coordinating nurse will follow the patients with weekly contacts throughout RT and to end of intervention 8 weeks post-RT. To ensure that each patient's intervention is properly adjusted to changing needs, repeated clinical assessments will be performed by the end of RT and 4 weeks post-RT.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ≥65 years of age
* confirmed cancer diagnosis (histology/cytology)
* living in one of the participating municipalities in the catchment area of Innlandet Hospital Trust or in the municipality of Trondheim
* referred for palliative or curative RT
* fluency in Norwegian, orally and in writing
* ability to fill in self-report questionnaires
* provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* severely ill with a life expectancy \< 3months
* referred to receive one fraction of RT only (one day treatment)
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Trondheim University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Trondheim Kommune

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oslo University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Oslo

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oslo Metropolitan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sykehuset Innlandet HF

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marit S Jordhøy, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sykehuset Innlandet HF

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Innlandet Hospital Trust

Gjøvik, , Norway

Site Status

St Olav Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital

Trondheim, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Royset I, Saltvedt I, Rostoft S, Gronberg BH, Kirkevold O, Oldervoll L, Bye A, Benth JS, Bergh S, Melby L, Halsteinli V, Dohl O, Rostad T, Eriksen GF, Sollid MIV, Rolfson D, Slaaen M. Geriatric assessment with management for older patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy. Protocol of a Norwegian cluster-randomised controlled pilot study. J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 Apr;13(3):363-373. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34776384 (View on PubMed)

Sollid MIV, Melby L, Slaaen M, Eilertsen G, Royset IM, Kirkevold O. Experiences With an Intervention Based on Geriatric Assessment With Management: A Qualitative Study. Nurs Open. 2025 Apr;12(4):e70220. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70220.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40223637 (View on PubMed)

Slaaen M, Royset IM, Saltvedt I, Gronberg BH, Halsteinli V, Dohl O, Vossius C, Kirkevold O, Bergh S, Rostoft S, Oldervoll L, Bye A, Melby L, Rosstad T, Eriksen GF, Sollid MIV, Rolfson D, Saltyte Benth J. Geriatric assessment with management for older patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy: a cluster-randomised controlled pilot study. BMC Med. 2024 Jun 10;22(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03446-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38853251 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34776384/

Røyset et al. Protocolpaper, JGO 2022 Apr;13(3):363-373. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.11.001.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SI0303150406

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.