Practical Geriatric Assessment in Older Adults With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

NCT ID: NCT06987890

Last Updated: 2025-07-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-26

Study Completion Date

2026-06-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

National guidelines recommend that older adults with cancer undergo a special health assessment before starting cancer treatment. This type of assessment evaluates physical function, nutrition, social support, psychological well-being, medical conditions (both cancer-related and non-cancer-related), and cognitive function. The results can help doctors make better treatment decisions and determine whether additional support services-such as nutrition counseling, physical therapy, or social work-would be beneficial. Even though these assessments are recommended, they are not typically used because they need to be performed by a specialist and can take over an hour to complete. Given these challenges, a 10-15-minute assessment called the Practical Geriatric Assessment (PGA) was recently developed. The PGA can be completed by any healthcare provider and helps identify older adults who may need extra support alongside their cancer treatment. While the PGA has the potential to make geriatric assessments more accessible, the investigators do not yet know whether patients will find it useful or easy to complete.

Additionally, it is unclear whether using the PGA will lead to more referrals for recommended supportive care services. This study aims to address these questions. The investigators will evaluate whether using the PGA impacts the number of patients referred to recommended supportive care services. Investigators will also evaluate how participants feel about completing the PGA, including how easy or difficult it is, and to assess the feasibility of implementing this survey on a larger scale. Finally, the investigators will use facial photographs and audio-visual data from the PGA to develop and evaluate artificial intelligence algorithm(s) to identify vulnerable patients who might benefit from additional supportive care services.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is one proven mechanism for delineating baseline care needs and improving outcomes in older adults with lung cancer. This type of geriatrician-led assessment, which captures functional ability, health, and socio-environmental situation, can be used to identify vulnerable older adults for whom tailored interventions might optimize care. However, CGA can be resource-intensive to perform, and may not practically possible in all settings, particularly given national shortages in geriatricians. At BWH/DFCI, retrospective work among patients with stage I-II NSCLC suggests fewer than 5% of patients receive CGA, despite 76% meeting national guidelines for this type of evaluation. These findings underscore the practical challenges of assessing geriatric needs, even in high-resource settings.

To address these barriers, abridged instruments capturing the key domains of the CGA which can be completed by any provider within 10-25 minutes have recently been developed, including the practical geriatric assessment (PGA) tool. This screening tool, which is now recommended by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the International Society for Geriatric Oncology (SIOG), and the Cancer \& Aging Research Group (CARG), has the potential capacity to delineate relevant baseline features in geriatric populations without creating undue provider burden. However, the feasibility of implementing the PGA and its acceptability to patients remain unclear. Further, relationships between the PGA and salient outcomes, including subsequent patterns of recommended care delivery, remain underexplored. To improve outcomes among high-risk subgroups interfacing with radiation oncology, including older adults with NSCLC undergoing SBRT, further interrogation of these practical factors is needed.

Finally, the investigators will use facial photographs and audio-visual data from the PGA to develop and evaluate artificial intelligence algorithm(s) to identify vulnerable patients who might benefit from additional supportive care services.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Geriatric Assessment Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PGA IMPLEMENTED IN NSCLC WITH SBRT

Providers will be made aware of PGA results and all recommended referrals based on PGA results. Providers will be reminded weekly for up to one month regarding these recommendations.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Practical Geriatric Assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

The Practical Geriatric Assessment (PGA) is an abridged version of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). This tool can be completed by any provider within 10-25 minutes while still capturing the key domains of the CGA. This screening tool, which is now recommended by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the International Society for Geriatric Oncology (SIOG), and the Cancer \& Aging Research Group (CARG), has the potential capacity to delineate relevant baseline features in geriatric populations without creating undue provider burden.

SUPPORTIVE CARE WITHOUT PGA IN NSCLC WITH SBRT

Though PGA questions will be completed to characterize baseline impairment, providers will not be notified of PGA results or recommended referrals based on PGA results. Providers will assess for geriatric impairment at their discretion, and will make any service referrals they deem necessary, also at their discretion.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Practical Geriatric Assessment

The Practical Geriatric Assessment (PGA) is an abridged version of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). This tool can be completed by any provider within 10-25 minutes while still capturing the key domains of the CGA. This screening tool, which is now recommended by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the International Society for Geriatric Oncology (SIOG), and the Cancer \& Aging Research Group (CARG), has the potential capacity to delineate relevant baseline features in geriatric populations without creating undue provider burden.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PGA

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 65 years old at time of study enrollment.
* Radiographically or pathologically confirmed stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer.
* All patients must have undergone appropriate complete imaging of their cancer consistent with the standard of care.
* Patient is expected to undergo stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
* Able to read questions in English or willing to complete survey questionnaires with the assistance of an interpreter.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Raymond Mak

Associate Professor of Radiation Oncology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Raymond Mak

Role: primary

6177328651

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

25-009

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Assessment Tool for Older Patients With Cancer
NCT00477958 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA