Validation of a Screening Tool in Geriatric Oncology

NCT ID: NCT00963911

Last Updated: 2021-04-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1674 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-08-05

Study Completion Date

2015-03-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: A screening questionnaire may help doctors plan better treatment for older patients with cancer.

PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying a questionnaire in screening older patients with cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

* Validate a new screening tool (G8).

Secondary

* Validate the French version of the screening tool "Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13)".
* Evaluate the merits of the screening tools (G8 and VES-13).
* Assess the screening tool in specific populations.
* Assess the number and type of interventions proposed after thorough geriatric assessment.
* Compare the two new tools (G8 vs VES-13).

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.

During the first consultation, patients have an initial clinical evaluation questionnaire comprising the G8. They also complete the self-questionnaire VES-13. Within 30 days, patients have a thorough geriatric assessment, including quality of life and physical function, by a physician without access to the G8 or VES-13 questionnaires. A blood specimen is also collected.

Information on health status and quality of life is collected from medical records or from the doctor after 1 and 5 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer Colorectal Cancer Head and Neck Cancer Lung Cancer Lymphoma Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Included patients

Screening tests (G8 and VES-13)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Geriatric screening tests

Intervention Type OTHER

The G-8 consists of eight items: patient age (\>85, 80-85, \<80), and seven items from the original 18-item MNA (Mini Nutritional Assessment: appetite changes, weight loss, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, medication, and self-rated health). The total score ranges from 0 to 17, with lower scores indicating a higher risk of impairments. The cut-off value for an 'impaired' reference test score was \<=14 and the time taken to complete the test was recorded.

VES-13 is a self-administered questionnaire that was completed during the first visit after enrollment. For three pre-identified centers, patients also filled in the questionnaire at the following geriatric visit. VES-13 consisted of four groups of questions: age, self-perceived health, difficulties to perform six specific activities, and difficulties to perform daily living tasks due to health concerns. The score ranged from 0 to 10 and a score \>=3 was considered to show impairment.

Multidimensional geriatric assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients underwent a geriatric evaluation in the month following the completion of G8 and VES-13 (+/- seven days) before treatment began. The nurse completed six of the seven instruments of the MGA (MNA, Timed Get up and Go (TUG), Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental ADL (IADL), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15)), and the geriatrician rated comorbidity on the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS-G), recorded the time required for the consultation, identified patients who needed personalized geriatric interventions, and, if necessary, proposed further geriatric evaluation (outside of the scope of this study).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Geriatric screening tests

The G-8 consists of eight items: patient age (\>85, 80-85, \<80), and seven items from the original 18-item MNA (Mini Nutritional Assessment: appetite changes, weight loss, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, medication, and self-rated health). The total score ranges from 0 to 17, with lower scores indicating a higher risk of impairments. The cut-off value for an 'impaired' reference test score was \<=14 and the time taken to complete the test was recorded.

VES-13 is a self-administered questionnaire that was completed during the first visit after enrollment. For three pre-identified centers, patients also filled in the questionnaire at the following geriatric visit. VES-13 consisted of four groups of questions: age, self-perceived health, difficulties to perform six specific activities, and difficulties to perform daily living tasks due to health concerns. The score ranged from 0 to 10 and a score \>=3 was considered to show impairment.

Intervention Type OTHER

Multidimensional geriatric assessment

Patients underwent a geriatric evaluation in the month following the completion of G8 and VES-13 (+/- seven days) before treatment began. The nurse completed six of the seven instruments of the MGA (MNA, Timed Get up and Go (TUG), Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental ADL (IADL), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15)), and the geriatrician rated comorbidity on the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS-G), recorded the time required for the consultation, identified patients who needed personalized geriatric interventions, and, if necessary, proposed further geriatric evaluation (outside of the scope of this study).

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

G-8 MGA

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

* Histologically confirmed cancer including the following types:

* Colon
* Rectal
* Lung
* Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
* Breast
* Prostate
* Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
* Planning to undergo first-time treatment comprising medicine, surgery, or radiotherapy

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

* No persons deprived of liberty or under guardianship
* No psychological, familial, social, or geographical reasons that would make monitoring clinically impossible

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

* See Disease Characteristics
Minimum Eligible Age

70 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

120 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute, France

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Institut Bergonié

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pierre Soubeyran, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institut Bergonié

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Institut Bergonie

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bellera CA, Artaud F, Rainfray M, Soubeyran PL, Mathoulin-Pelissier S. Modeling individual and relative accuracy of screening tools in geriatric oncology. Ann Oncol. 2017 May 1;28(5):1152-1157. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx068.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28327973 (View on PubMed)

Soubeyran P, Bellera C, Goyard J, Heitz D, Cure H, Rousselot H, Albrand G, Servent V, Jean OS, van Praagh I, Kurtz JE, Perin S, Verhaeghe JL, Terret C, Desauw C, Girre V, Mertens C, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Rainfray M. Screening for vulnerability in older cancer patients: the ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 11;9(12):e115060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115060. eCollection 2014.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25503576 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IB-ONCODAGE

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

IB 2008-06

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2008-A00322-53

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

IB 2008-06

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Assessment Tool for Older Patients With Cancer
NCT00477958 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA