Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1674 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-08-05
2015-03-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying a questionnaire in screening older patients with cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Screening Tools to Predict Treatment Outcome in Older Cancer Patients Who Are Undergoing Treatment
NCT01005693
A Geriatric Oncology Collaborative Care Intervention for Older Adults With Advanced Cancer
NCT03721926
Role of Geriatric Intervention in Treatment of Older Patients With Cancer (PREPARE)
NCT02704832
Optimization and Improvement of Care Course for 75 Years and Over Patient With Cancer and Living in Nursing Home on the Marseille Agglomeration
NCT03103659
Transdisciplinary Intervention Integrating Geriatric And Palliative Care With Oncology Care For Older Adults With Cancer
NCT02868112
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary
* Validate a new screening tool (G8).
Secondary
* Validate the French version of the screening tool "Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13)".
* Evaluate the merits of the screening tools (G8 and VES-13).
* Assess the screening tool in specific populations.
* Assess the number and type of interventions proposed after thorough geriatric assessment.
* Compare the two new tools (G8 vs VES-13).
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.
During the first consultation, patients have an initial clinical evaluation questionnaire comprising the G8. They also complete the self-questionnaire VES-13. Within 30 days, patients have a thorough geriatric assessment, including quality of life and physical function, by a physician without access to the G8 or VES-13 questionnaires. A blood specimen is also collected.
Information on health status and quality of life is collected from medical records or from the doctor after 1 and 5 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Included patients
Screening tests (G8 and VES-13)
Geriatric screening tests
The G-8 consists of eight items: patient age (\>85, 80-85, \<80), and seven items from the original 18-item MNA (Mini Nutritional Assessment: appetite changes, weight loss, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, medication, and self-rated health). The total score ranges from 0 to 17, with lower scores indicating a higher risk of impairments. The cut-off value for an 'impaired' reference test score was \<=14 and the time taken to complete the test was recorded.
VES-13 is a self-administered questionnaire that was completed during the first visit after enrollment. For three pre-identified centers, patients also filled in the questionnaire at the following geriatric visit. VES-13 consisted of four groups of questions: age, self-perceived health, difficulties to perform six specific activities, and difficulties to perform daily living tasks due to health concerns. The score ranged from 0 to 10 and a score \>=3 was considered to show impairment.
Multidimensional geriatric assessment
Patients underwent a geriatric evaluation in the month following the completion of G8 and VES-13 (+/- seven days) before treatment began. The nurse completed six of the seven instruments of the MGA (MNA, Timed Get up and Go (TUG), Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental ADL (IADL), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15)), and the geriatrician rated comorbidity on the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS-G), recorded the time required for the consultation, identified patients who needed personalized geriatric interventions, and, if necessary, proposed further geriatric evaluation (outside of the scope of this study).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Geriatric screening tests
The G-8 consists of eight items: patient age (\>85, 80-85, \<80), and seven items from the original 18-item MNA (Mini Nutritional Assessment: appetite changes, weight loss, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, medication, and self-rated health). The total score ranges from 0 to 17, with lower scores indicating a higher risk of impairments. The cut-off value for an 'impaired' reference test score was \<=14 and the time taken to complete the test was recorded.
VES-13 is a self-administered questionnaire that was completed during the first visit after enrollment. For three pre-identified centers, patients also filled in the questionnaire at the following geriatric visit. VES-13 consisted of four groups of questions: age, self-perceived health, difficulties to perform six specific activities, and difficulties to perform daily living tasks due to health concerns. The score ranged from 0 to 10 and a score \>=3 was considered to show impairment.
Multidimensional geriatric assessment
Patients underwent a geriatric evaluation in the month following the completion of G8 and VES-13 (+/- seven days) before treatment began. The nurse completed six of the seven instruments of the MGA (MNA, Timed Get up and Go (TUG), Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental ADL (IADL), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15)), and the geriatrician rated comorbidity on the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS-G), recorded the time required for the consultation, identified patients who needed personalized geriatric interventions, and, if necessary, proposed further geriatric evaluation (outside of the scope of this study).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Histologically confirmed cancer including the following types:
* Colon
* Rectal
* Lung
* Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
* Breast
* Prostate
* Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
* Planning to undergo first-time treatment comprising medicine, surgery, or radiotherapy
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
* No persons deprived of liberty or under guardianship
* No psychological, familial, social, or geographical reasons that would make monitoring clinically impossible
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
* See Disease Characteristics
70 Years
120 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute, France
OTHER_GOV
Institut Bergonié
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pierre Soubeyran, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institut Bergonié
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institut Bergonie
Bordeaux, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bellera CA, Artaud F, Rainfray M, Soubeyran PL, Mathoulin-Pelissier S. Modeling individual and relative accuracy of screening tools in geriatric oncology. Ann Oncol. 2017 May 1;28(5):1152-1157. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx068.
Soubeyran P, Bellera C, Goyard J, Heitz D, Cure H, Rousselot H, Albrand G, Servent V, Jean OS, van Praagh I, Kurtz JE, Perin S, Verhaeghe JL, Terret C, Desauw C, Girre V, Mertens C, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Rainfray M. Screening for vulnerability in older cancer patients: the ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 11;9(12):e115060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115060. eCollection 2014.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IB-ONCODAGE
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IB 2008-06
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2008-A00322-53
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IB 2008-06
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.