Understanding the Preferences and Views of Older Adults on the Use of Geriatric and Objective Functional Assessments for Cancer Treatment Planning.
NCT ID: NCT06652347
Last Updated: 2025-02-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-02-21
2026-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main question it aims to answer is if providing this information changes the treatment priorities of older adults, helping them focus on what matters most to them in their medical care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Printed Education Materials in Patients Who Are Finishing Treatment for Stage I, Stage II, or Stage IIIA Breast Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Prostate Cancer, or Chest Cancer
NCT00372840
Improving Goals of Care Discussion in Advanced Cancer Patients
NCT02374255
Study of Physical and Mental Health of Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Cancer
NCT00769951
Understanding Needs of Older Patients Prior to Starting Cancer Treatment
NCT07225920
Improving Communication in Older Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers
NCT02107443
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Investigators will determine whether sharing of geriatric and OFS assessment results affected patients' treatment priorities by measuring the absolute change from baseline in the QQ questionnaire scores for quantity and quality of life, comparing the change in the intervention versus the control group. The Investigators will also describe patients' preferences for the collection, use and sharing of their assessment data as reported in the preferences questionnaire, both overall and by race/ethnicity. To explore differences in patients' satisfaction with their decision to pursue anti-cancer therapy by functional status level, participants will complete the "Was it Worth It" (WIWI) questionnaire at the first of either 1) the conclusion of their treatment regimen or 2) three months after enrollment. The provider assessment will ask whether patients experienced any of the following: a toxicity of treatment ≥grade 3, treatment dose reduction, treatment interruption, treatment discontinuation, hospitalization, or a decline in performance status.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Early Sharing Arm
early sharing of GA and OFS results to participants
Cancer care delivery
Early vs. delayed sharing of GA and OFS diagnostic results and how that sharing affects patient preferences, decision- making, and satisfaction in the context of participants' cancer care.
Delayed Sharing Arm
delayed sharing of GA and OFS results to participants
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cancer care delivery
Early vs. delayed sharing of GA and OFS diagnostic results and how that sharing affects patient preferences, decision- making, and satisfaction in the context of participants' cancer care.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
At the time of study screening either:
* Started a new qualifying index regimen within the last 30 days (inclusive)
* Are being considered for a new qualifying index regimen
Exclusion Criteria
* Do not have the capacity to consent to study procedures
* Are unable to complete English language questionnaires
* Are already using an activity tracker on a daily basis (and therefore may be aware of their current level of activity)
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
INDUSTRY
Fox Chase Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zachary Frosch
Assistant Professor Department of Hematology/Oncology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Zachary Frosch, MD, MSHP
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
24-1020
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.