Observational Retrospective Study of Effectivity and Tolerability in Patients With Lacosamide Medication
NCT ID: NCT01858870
Last Updated: 2013-05-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
860 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-04-30
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Previous studies has granted to the adjuvant therapy a significant efficacy. This is an observational study, multicenter and retrospective, in patients with epilepsy. The aim of study is the evaluation of the adjuvant treatment with Lacosamide administered over 12 months.
The investigators will collect information from 860 patients in 13 spanish centers.
The secondary aim is assess the tolerability of treatment during 3,6 and 12 month.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Trial to Demonstrate the Efficacy and Safety of Conversion to Lacosamide Monotherapy for Partial-onset Seizures
NCT00520741
Study to Investigate Lacosamide as Add-on Therapy in Subjects ≥4 Years to <17 Years of Age With Partial Onset Seizures
NCT01921205
Study of Lacosamide as an Adjunctive Drug Treatment for Epilepsy in Patients With Brain Tumors
NCT02276053
Trial to Assess Lacosamide as the First add-on Anti-epileptic Drug Treatment in Patients With Partial-onset Seizures
NCT00955357
Trial to Assess Long-term Lacosamide (LCM) Monotherapy Use and Safety of LCM Monotherapy and Adjunctive Therapy for Partial-onset Seizures
NCT00530855
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Clinical data obtained through post-hoc analysis for registered pivotal studies made in highly refractory epileptic patients show that adjuvant treatment with Lacosamide has an extra efficacy compared with placebo. It is self-depended to the treatment with or without sodium channel blockers.
This study will allow us to obtain information about real existing most population where do not exist as high refractoriness as the pivotal studies.
The population of study is:
Patients with epilepsy, with plus that 18 years old patients, with initial partial crisis treated with Lacosamide according to usual clinical practice in Spain.
Lacosamide must has been used for epilepsy treatment at least during 12 month.
The data record is collection in 5 months.
Inclusion criteria:
1. Adults (+18).
2. Patients with epilepsy partial crisis diagnostic that had been treated with Lacosamide according to usual clinical practice.
3. The patient had at least one partial crisis during the year before to the initiation of treatment with Lacosamide.
4. The patient or their legal agent is reliable and is be able to adhere to the protocol according to the investigation criteria.
Exclusion criteria:
1. Patient is in an other study of medical protocol or medical implant.
2. Patients with other kind of epilepsy.
3. patients with chronic alcoholism or abuse drug recording in the last year.
4. patients who don't be in possession of their faculties in the moment to sign Informed Consent.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lacosamide
patients with Partial Crisis of epilepsy treated with Lacosamide for at least 12 months
lacosamide
routine clinical practice
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
lacosamide
routine clinical practice
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. The patient has a diagnosis of prostate cancer of any kind, and has been treated with Lacosamide according to routine clinical practice.
3. The patient had at least one Partial Crisis during the year prior to initiation of treatment with Lacosamide.
4. The patient or their legal representative is reliable and able to adhere to the protocol (ie, is able to understand and complete the interview at the study visit), at the discretion of the investigator.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with other types of epilepsy.
3. Patients with a history of chronic alcoholism or drug abuse in the last year.
4. Patients who are not in possession of his faculties at the time of obtaining the Informed Consent.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La Fe
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Vicente V Villanueva, doctor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Iis la Fe
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Iis la Fe
Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LACO-EXP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.