Study to Investigate Lacosamide as Add-on Therapy in Subjects ≥4 Years to <17 Years of Age With Partial Onset Seizures
NCT ID: NCT01921205
Last Updated: 2018-07-18
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
404 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-08-29
2017-01-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of Lacosamide as Adjunctive Therapy in Subjects ≥1 Month to <4 Years With Partial-onset Seizures
NCT02477839
A Clinical Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Lacosamide as an Add on Therapy in Children With Epilepsy With Partial-onset Seizures
NCT01964560
A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Lacosamide Versus Placebo (a Pill Without Active Medication) in Patients With Idiopathic Generalised Epilepsy Who Are Already Taking Anti-epileptic Medications
NCT02408523
A Multicenter, Open-Label Study To Investigate The Safety And Pharmacokinetics Of Lacosamide In Children With Partial Seizures
NCT00938431
Safety and Efficacy of Lacosamide as Additional Therapy in Patients Suffering From Epileptic Tonic-Clonic Seizures
NCT02408549
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The secondary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of LCM in subjects ≥4 years to \<17 years of age.
An additional objective is to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of LCM in subjects ≥4 years to \<17 years of age.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lacosamide
Lacosamide
Subjects \<30 kg (LCM oral solution): 4 mg/kg - 6 mg/kg BID ( 8mg/kg/day - 12 mg/kg/day)
Subjects ≥30 kg to \<50 kg (LCM oral solution): 3 mg/kg - 4 mg/kg BID (6 mg/kg/day - 8 mg/kg/day)
Subjects ≥50 kg (LCM tablets): 150 mg - 200 mg BID (300 mg/day - 400 mg/day)
Placebo
Placebo
Subjects \<30 kg (placebo oral solution): 4 mg/kg - 6 mg/kg BID (8 mg/kg/day - 12 mg/kg/day)
Subjects ≥30 kg to \<50 kg (placebo oral solution): 3 mg/kg - 4 mg/kg BID (6 mg/kg/day - 8 mg/kg/day)
Subjects ≥50 kg (placebo tablets): 150 mg - 200 mg BID (300 mg/day - 400 mg/day)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lacosamide
Subjects \<30 kg (LCM oral solution): 4 mg/kg - 6 mg/kg BID ( 8mg/kg/day - 12 mg/kg/day)
Subjects ≥30 kg to \<50 kg (LCM oral solution): 3 mg/kg - 4 mg/kg BID (6 mg/kg/day - 8 mg/kg/day)
Subjects ≥50 kg (LCM tablets): 150 mg - 200 mg BID (300 mg/day - 400 mg/day)
Placebo
Subjects \<30 kg (placebo oral solution): 4 mg/kg - 6 mg/kg BID (8 mg/kg/day - 12 mg/kg/day)
Subjects ≥30 kg to \<50 kg (placebo oral solution): 3 mg/kg - 4 mg/kg BID (6 mg/kg/day - 8 mg/kg/day)
Subjects ≥50 kg (placebo tablets): 150 mg - 200 mg BID (300 mg/day - 400 mg/day)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subject/legal representative is considered reliable and capable of adhering to the protocol (eg, able to understand and complete diaries), visit schedule, and medication intake according to the judgment of the investigator
* Subject is male or female from ≥4 years to \<17 years of age
* Subject has a diagnosis of Epilepsy with partial-onset seizures. The results of ≥1 prior electroencephalogram (EEG) AND 1 prior magnetic resonance imaging/computerized tomography scan should be consistent with the above diagnosis
* Subject has been observed to have uncontrolled partial-onset seizures after an adequate course of treatment (in the opinion of the investigator) with ≥2 Anti-Epileptic Drugs (AEDs) (concurrently or sequentially)
* Subject must have been observed to have on average ≥2 partial onset seizures per 28 days with seizure free phase no longer than 21 days in the 8 week period prior to entry into the Baseline Period. During this study, subjects must have reported ≥2 partial onset seizures during the 8 week prospective Baseline Period to be eligible for randomization at Visit 2. (Note: In the case of simple partial onset seizures, only those seizures with motor signs will be counted towards meeting the inclusion criterion.)
* Subject is on a stable dosage regimen of 1 to ≤3 AEDs. The daily dosage regimen of concomitant AED therapy must be kept constant for a period of ≥4 weeks prior to the Baseline Period
* Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) is allowed and will not be counted as a concomitant AED. The VNS device must be implanted for ≥6 months before Visit 1, and the device settings must be stable for ≥4 weeks before Visit 1 and be kept stable during the Baseline Period. Use of the VNS device magnet is allowed
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject has participated in another study of an investigational medicinal product (IMP) or a medical device within ≤2 months of Visit 1 or is currently participating in another study of an IMP or a medical device
* Subject has any medical or psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could jeopardize or would compromise the subject's ability to participate in this study
* Subject ≥6 years of age has a lifetime history of suicide attempt (including an actual attempt, interrupted attempt, or aborted attempt), or has suicidal ideation in the past 6 months as indicated by a positive response ("Yes") to either Question 4 or Question 5 of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C SSRS) at Screening
* Subject has a known hypersensitivity to any component of the IMP or has ever received LCM
* Female subject who is pregnant or nursing, and/or a female subject of childbearing potential who is not surgically sterile or does not practice 1 highly effective method of contraception (according to International Conference on Harmonisation \[ICH\] guidance defined as those that result in a failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly), unless sexually abstinent, for the duration of the study. Female subject of childbearing potential taking enzyme inducing antiepileptic drugs (EI AEDs: carbamazepine, phenytoin, barbiturates, primidone, topiramate, oxcarbazepine) who is not surgically sterile or does not practice 1 highly effective method of contraception according to the WHO recommendation (ie, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, norethisterone enantate, intrauterine devices, combined injectables, and progestogen implants) with administration of EI AEDs OR does not practice 2 combined methods of contraception (ie, combined hormonal contraception plus barrier method with spermicidal agent), unless sexually abstinent, for the duration of the study
* Subject has a medical condition that could be expected in the opinion of the investigator to interfere with drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion
* Subject has experienced febrile seizures exclusively. The occurrence of febrile seizures in addition to other unprovoked seizures is not exclusionary
* Subject is on a ketogenic or other specialized diet. If the subject was on a specialized diet in the past, they must be off the diet for ≥2 months prior to the Baseline Period
* Subject has an alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), or total bilirubin level ≥2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), or creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min
* Subject has a clinically relevant ECG abnormality, in the opinion of the investigator (eg, second or third degree heart block at rest or a corrected QT interval \[QTc\] greater than 450 ms)
* Subject has hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease
* Subject has an arrhythmic heart condition requiring medical therapy
* Subject has a known history of severe anaphylactic reaction or serious blood dyscrasias
* Subject has nonepileptic events that could be confused with seizures
* Subject has a current diagnosis of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, primary generalized epilepsy, mixed seizure disorder (partial and primarily generalized seizures), or purely nocturnal seizures
* Subject has a history of convulsive status epilepticus ≤2 months prior to the Baseline Period
* Subject has been treated with vigabatrin and experienced any vision loss. Subjects who have received vigabatrin in the past must have documentation of an assessment for vision loss prior to study entry or documentation of why visual field testing cannot be performed
* Subject has been treated with felbamate and has experienced any serious toxicity issues (defined as liver failure, aplastic anemia) with this treatment. Subjects treated with felbamate for \<12 months are excluded. Note: any subject who has been treated with felbamate for ≥12 months and has not experienced serious toxicity issues is eligible
* Subject has a medically documented history of alcohol or drug abuse
* Subject has a known cardiac sodium channelopathy, such as Brugada syndrome
* Subject has an acute or sub acutely progressive central nervous system disease. Subject has epilepsy secondary to a progressing cerebral disease or any other progressively neurodegenerative disease (malignant brain tumor or Rasmussen Syndrome)
4 Years
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
UCB Pharma
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
UCB Cares
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
+1 877 822 9493
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
127
Boulder, Colorado, United States
105
Orlando, Florida, United States
117
Tampa, Florida, United States
103
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
124
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
112
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
121
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
115
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
102
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
640
Eugene, Oregon, United States
122
Dallas, Texas, United States
101
Tomball, Texas, United States
114
Seattle, Washington, United States
143
Buenos Aires, , Argentina
142
Córdoba, , Argentina
200
Heidelberg West, , Australia
203
Herston, , Australia
205
South Brisbane, , Australia
304
Brussels, , Belgium
310
Sofia, , Bulgaria
312
Sofia, , Bulgaria
172
Floridablanca, , Colombia
171
Medellín, , Colombia
613
Osijek, , Croatia
610
Rijeka, , Croatia
612
Zagreb, , Croatia
321
Hradec Králové, , Czechia
320
Ostrava-Poruba, , Czechia
322
Prague, , Czechia
323
Prague, , Czechia
331
Tallinn, , Estonia
330
Tartu, , Estonia
620
Tbilisi, , Georgia
621
Tbilisi, , Georgia
622
Tbilisi, , Georgia
623
Tbilisi, , Georgia
361
Budapest, , Hungary
362
Budapest, , Hungary
363
Budapest, , Hungary
364
Budapest, , Hungary
360
Debrecen, , Hungary
367
Miskolc, , Hungary
366
Pécs, , Hungary
370
Holon, , Israel
371
Kfar Saba, , Israel
374
Petah Tikva, , Israel
372
Tel Aviv, , Israel
384
Bologna, , Italy
388
Florence, , Italy
387
Genova, , Italy
380
Mantova, , Italy
381
Milan, , Italy
393
Padua, , Italy
383
Roma, , Italy
392
Roma, , Italy
386
Verona, , Italy
400
Riga, , Latvia
402
Valmiera, , Latvia
411
Kaunas, , Lithuania
569
Culiacán, , Mexico
563
Guadalajara, , Mexico
568
Monterrey, , Mexico
660
Podgorica, , Montenegro
433
Gdansk, , Poland
432
Katowice, , Poland
420
Kielce, , Poland
422
Krakow, , Poland
431
Krakow, , Poland
423
Poznan, , Poland
425
Poznan, , Poland
421
Szczecin, , Poland
429
Tyniec Mały, , Poland
430
Warsaw, , Poland
428
Wroclaw, , Poland
574
Bucharest, , Romania
572
Cluj-Napoca, , Romania
576
Sibiu, , Romania
580
Suceava, , Romania
570
Timișoara, , Romania
577
Timișoara, , Romania
443
Kazan', , Russia
444
Kazan', , Russia
442
Moscow, , Russia
449
Moscow, , Russia
441
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
446
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
440
Smolensk, , Russia
447
Voronezh, , Russia
464
Belgrade, , Serbia
460
Kragujevac, , Serbia
461
New Belgrade, , Serbia
462
Novi Sad, , Serbia
463
Novi Sad, , Serbia
470
Bardejov, , Slovakia
473
Nitra, , Slovakia
472
Nové Zámky, , Slovakia
670
Ljubljana, , Slovenia
211
Daegu, , South Korea
210
Seoul, , South Korea
212
Seoul, , South Korea
213
Seoul, , South Korea
215
Seoul, , South Korea
220
Changhua, , Taiwan
222
Taichung, , Taiwan
224
Taipei, , Taiwan
232
Bangkok, , Thailand
236
Bangkoknoi, , Thailand
231
Muang, , Thailand
233
Muang, , Thailand
235
Pathumwan, , Thailand
230
Ratchathewi, , Thailand
602
Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine
606
Kiev, , Ukraine
682
Uzhhorod, , Ukraine
603
Vinnitsa, , Ukraine
514
Birmingham, , United Kingdom
515
Birmingham, , United Kingdom
511
Leeds, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Johnson ME, McClung C, Bozorg AM. Analyses of seizure responses supportive of a novel trial design to assess efficacy of antiepileptic drugs in infants and young children with epilepsy: Post hoc analyses of pediatric levetiracetam and lacosamide trials. Epilepsia Open. 2021 Jun;6(2):359-368. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12482. Epub 2021 May 3.
Babar RK, Bresnahan R, Gillespie CS, Michael BD. Lacosamide add-on therapy for focal epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 17;5(5):CD008841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008841.pub3.
Farkas V, Steinborn B, Flamini JR, Zhang Y, Yuen N, Borghs S, Bozorg A, Daniels T, Martin P, Carney HC, Dimova S, Scheffer IE; SP0969 Study Group. Efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide in pediatric patients with focal seizures. Neurology. 2019 Sep 17;93(12):e1212-e1226. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008126. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Study Protocol
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
FDA Safety Alerts and Recalls
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2012-004996-38
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
SP0969
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.