New Gentle Biopsy Method of Cervix Lesions Using Superficial Curettage/Protocol ID: CX-CUR

NCT ID: NCT01836588

Last Updated: 2013-04-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-03-31

Study Completion Date

2014-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

It is to investigate to what extent a gentle tissue extraction of CIN lesions of the cervix will bring the same conclusion than the conventional cervix biopsy, but with less pain and morbidity, after patients were undergoing a conisation in order to treat CIN.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

CIN Cervical Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

gentle tissue extraction (curettage)

Object of this study is the evaluation of two different methods of gaining cervical tissue in order to determine whether, and if so in what extent, a CIN is existent. The first method is a cervical biopsy, the second method is a gentle tissue saving curettage of the cervix uteri. Also is to be investigated that the latter method shows a reduction of pain and morbidity after the procedure.

For this reason the pathological outcome of the two methods will be compared to the result of a conisation, which will be received by the patient to cure their cervical lesions.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

conventional cervix biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Object of this study is the evaluation of two different methods of gaining cervical tissue in order to determine whether, and if so in what extent, a CIN is existent. The first method is a cervical biopsy, the second method is a gentle tissue saving curettage of the cervix uteri. Also is to be investigated that the latter method shows a reduction of pain and morbidity after the procedure.

For this reason the pathological outcome of the two methods will be compared to the result of a conisation, which will be received by the patient to cure their cervical lesions.

conventional cervix biopsy

Object of this study is the evaluation of two different methods of gaining cervical tissue in order to determine whether, and if so in what extent, a CIN is existent. The first method is a cervical biopsy, the second method is a gentle tissue saving curettage of the cervix uteri. Also is to be investigated that the latter method shows a reduction of pain and morbidity after the procedure.

For this reason the pathological outcome of the two methods will be compared to the result of a conisation, which will be received by the patient to cure their cervical lesions.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

conventional cervix biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Object of this study is the evaluation of two different methods of gaining cervical tissue in order to determine whether, and if so in what extent, a CIN is existent. The first method is a cervical biopsy, the second method is a gentle tissue saving curettage of the cervix uteri. Also is to be investigated that the latter method shows a reduction of pain and morbidity after the procedure.

For this reason the pathological outcome of the two methods will be compared to the result of a conisation, which will be received by the patient to cure their cervical lesions.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

conventional cervix biopsy

Object of this study is the evaluation of two different methods of gaining cervical tissue in order to determine whether, and if so in what extent, a CIN is existent. The first method is a cervical biopsy, the second method is a gentle tissue saving curettage of the cervix uteri. Also is to be investigated that the latter method shows a reduction of pain and morbidity after the procedure.

For this reason the pathological outcome of the two methods will be compared to the result of a conisation, which will be received by the patient to cure their cervical lesions.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women between 18 and 80
* Karnofsky-Index of 80 and higher
* Cytological suspicious CIN and a colposcopical impression of a major lesion (therapeutical endpoint: conisation)

Exclusion Criteria

* Former malign disease oft he pelvic organs
* Pregnancy
* Serious internistic diseases
* Drug addiction
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Deutsche Klinik fuer Diagnostik

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Charite University, Berlin, Germany

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tim Schellenberg

physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Achim Schneider, Prof. Dr., MPH

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Charité University Berlin, Germany

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Charité

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CX-CUR

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cervix:Hypoxia, Interstitial Fluid Pressure and GSH Levels
NCT00188539 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2