New Gentle Biopsy Method of Cervix Lesions Using Superficial Curettage/Protocol ID: CX-CUR
NCT ID: NCT01836588
Last Updated: 2013-04-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-03-31
2014-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Endocervical Evaluation With the Curette Versus Cytobrush for the Diagnosis of Dysplasia of the Uterine Cervix
NCT01435590
Comparison of 2 Types of Cervical Specimens in Patients With a Pathological Screening Smear
NCT04000477
Coughing at Time of Cervical Biopsy
NCT06149598
Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) Grade III With Non-invasive Physical Plasma
NCT04753073
Diagnostic Cervical Conization for Persistent Infection or Integration of HPV
NCT05510830
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
gentle tissue extraction (curettage)
Object of this study is the evaluation of two different methods of gaining cervical tissue in order to determine whether, and if so in what extent, a CIN is existent. The first method is a cervical biopsy, the second method is a gentle tissue saving curettage of the cervix uteri. Also is to be investigated that the latter method shows a reduction of pain and morbidity after the procedure.
For this reason the pathological outcome of the two methods will be compared to the result of a conisation, which will be received by the patient to cure their cervical lesions.
conventional cervix biopsy
Object of this study is the evaluation of two different methods of gaining cervical tissue in order to determine whether, and if so in what extent, a CIN is existent. The first method is a cervical biopsy, the second method is a gentle tissue saving curettage of the cervix uteri. Also is to be investigated that the latter method shows a reduction of pain and morbidity after the procedure.
For this reason the pathological outcome of the two methods will be compared to the result of a conisation, which will be received by the patient to cure their cervical lesions.
conventional cervix biopsy
Object of this study is the evaluation of two different methods of gaining cervical tissue in order to determine whether, and if so in what extent, a CIN is existent. The first method is a cervical biopsy, the second method is a gentle tissue saving curettage of the cervix uteri. Also is to be investigated that the latter method shows a reduction of pain and morbidity after the procedure.
For this reason the pathological outcome of the two methods will be compared to the result of a conisation, which will be received by the patient to cure their cervical lesions.
conventional cervix biopsy
Object of this study is the evaluation of two different methods of gaining cervical tissue in order to determine whether, and if so in what extent, a CIN is existent. The first method is a cervical biopsy, the second method is a gentle tissue saving curettage of the cervix uteri. Also is to be investigated that the latter method shows a reduction of pain and morbidity after the procedure.
For this reason the pathological outcome of the two methods will be compared to the result of a conisation, which will be received by the patient to cure their cervical lesions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
conventional cervix biopsy
Object of this study is the evaluation of two different methods of gaining cervical tissue in order to determine whether, and if so in what extent, a CIN is existent. The first method is a cervical biopsy, the second method is a gentle tissue saving curettage of the cervix uteri. Also is to be investigated that the latter method shows a reduction of pain and morbidity after the procedure.
For this reason the pathological outcome of the two methods will be compared to the result of a conisation, which will be received by the patient to cure their cervical lesions.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Karnofsky-Index of 80 and higher
* Cytological suspicious CIN and a colposcopical impression of a major lesion (therapeutical endpoint: conisation)
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Serious internistic diseases
* Drug addiction
18 Years
80 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Deutsche Klinik fuer Diagnostik
OTHER
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tim Schellenberg
physician
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Achim Schneider, Prof. Dr., MPH
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Charité University Berlin, Germany
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Charité
Berlin, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Related Info
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CX-CUR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.