Accelerating Word Learning in Children With Language Impairment
NCT ID: NCT01829360
Last Updated: 2019-11-14
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
35 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-03-31
2018-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Kindergarten Children Acquiring Words Through Storybook Reading
NCT03586479
Retrieval-Based Word Learning in Developmental Language Disorder During Book Reading II
NCT07048392
Retrieval-Based Word Learning in Developmental Language Disorder During Book Reading
NCT06026124
Word Learning in Children With Autism
NCT03419611
Neural Prediction to Enhance Language
NCT05962359
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study further tests the adequate intensity of 36 exposures. Each child will receive two treatments at the identified adequate intensity. Children were randomized to two treatments: the standard treatment and 1 of 2 alternative treatments. The standard treatment used in prior research was balanced between the amount of times the new word is heard within the book (dose 6) and the amount of times the book is read (dose frequency 6). The alternative treatments were more heavily weighted for either repetitions within the book (high dose/low dose frequency, i.e., dose 9 x dose frequency 4) or the amount of times the book is read (low dose/high dose frequency, i.e., dose 4 x dose frequency 9). Ultimately, this study determines how best to achieve the adequate intensity of 36 exposures.
A secondary goal was to further examine the pre-treatment factors associated with the number of words learned by children with SLI during interactive book reading. We once again explore a variety of potential predictors including those that were significant in a prior study (i.e., phonological awareness, nonword repetition, and semantics) as well as those that were not significant in a prior study but that had the potential to be related to a child's ability to learn during interactive book reading. That is, a child's general language abilities (as measured by the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-4, CELF-4, Core Language score) and their ability to understand verbally presented stories (as measured by the CELF-4 Understanding Spoken Paragraphs score) could impact their success in encoding new words during interactive book reading.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard then Alternative: High Dose
Children in this arm are assigned to the standard treatment for the first round of intervention (dose 6 x dose frequency 6) and then the alternative treatment that maximizes dose (dose 9 x dose frequency 4)
Treatment (interactive book reading, dialogic reading, shared book reading)
Children receive 2 rounds of treatment with interactive book reading. Each treatment teaches 30 words that the children do not know. Treatments vary in dose (the number of times the words is heard/taught in an individual book reading session: 4 vs. 6 vs. 9) and dose frequency (the number of times book reading sessions are repeated: 4 vs. 6. vs. 9). Across all dose x dose frequency combinations, children hear/are taught the 30 words 36 times, which has been shown to be the adequate overall intensity of the intervention.
Alternative: High Dose then Standard
Children in this arm are assigned to the alternative treatment that maximizes dose (dose 9 x dose frequency 4) in the first round of intervention and then to the standard treatment for the second round of intervention (dose 6 x dose frequency 6)
Treatment (interactive book reading, dialogic reading, shared book reading)
Children receive 2 rounds of treatment with interactive book reading. Each treatment teaches 30 words that the children do not know. Treatments vary in dose (the number of times the words is heard/taught in an individual book reading session: 4 vs. 6 vs. 9) and dose frequency (the number of times book reading sessions are repeated: 4 vs. 6. vs. 9). Across all dose x dose frequency combinations, children hear/are taught the 30 words 36 times, which has been shown to be the adequate overall intensity of the intervention.
Alternative: High Dose Frequency then Standard
Children in this arm are assigned to the alternative treatment that maximizes dose frequency (dose 4 x dose frequency 9) in the first round of intervention and then to the standard treatment for the second round of intervention (dose 6 x dose frequency 6)
Treatment (interactive book reading, dialogic reading, shared book reading)
Children receive 2 rounds of treatment with interactive book reading. Each treatment teaches 30 words that the children do not know. Treatments vary in dose (the number of times the words is heard/taught in an individual book reading session: 4 vs. 6 vs. 9) and dose frequency (the number of times book reading sessions are repeated: 4 vs. 6. vs. 9). Across all dose x dose frequency combinations, children hear/are taught the 30 words 36 times, which has been shown to be the adequate overall intensity of the intervention.
Standard then Alternative: High Dose Frequency
Children in this arm are assigned to the standard treatment for the first round of intervention (dose 6 x dose frequency 6) and then the alternative treatment that maximizes dose frequency (dose 4 x dose frequency 9)
Treatment (interactive book reading, dialogic reading, shared book reading)
Children receive 2 rounds of treatment with interactive book reading. Each treatment teaches 30 words that the children do not know. Treatments vary in dose (the number of times the words is heard/taught in an individual book reading session: 4 vs. 6 vs. 9) and dose frequency (the number of times book reading sessions are repeated: 4 vs. 6. vs. 9). Across all dose x dose frequency combinations, children hear/are taught the 30 words 36 times, which has been shown to be the adequate overall intensity of the intervention.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Treatment (interactive book reading, dialogic reading, shared book reading)
Children receive 2 rounds of treatment with interactive book reading. Each treatment teaches 30 words that the children do not know. Treatments vary in dose (the number of times the words is heard/taught in an individual book reading session: 4 vs. 6 vs. 9) and dose frequency (the number of times book reading sessions are repeated: 4 vs. 6. vs. 9). Across all dose x dose frequency combinations, children hear/are taught the 30 words 36 times, which has been shown to be the adequate overall intensity of the intervention.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 5 to 6 years
* Normal hearing
* Nonverbal Intelligence Quotient (IQ) of 85 or higher on the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scale
* Score below 82 on the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals
* Score at or below the 10% percentile on one of the approved standardized vocabulary assessments.
Exclusion Criteria
* Health history indicating neurologic or other disorder that would exclude a diagnosis of SLI (e.g., autism, developmental disability, seizure disorder)
5 Years
6 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Kansas
OTHER
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
NIH
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Holly Storkel
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Kansas
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Kansas
Lawrence, Kansas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Study Documents
Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.
Other Identifiers
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.