Evidence-Based Interventions to Enhance Outcomes Among Struggling Readers

NCT ID: NCT04059939

Last Updated: 2024-08-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

542 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-08-01

Study Completion Date

2024-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Despite decades of research on reading disabilities, little is known about improving reading in the middle grades (i.e., grades 3-6) and advancements have been hindered by the narrow focus on reading problems alone without acknowledgement of non-academic factors shown to affect learning (e.g., child self-regulation). This proposal employs a highly innovative approach aimed at improving intervention outcomes through the integration of evidence-based practices for addressing reading, as well as self-regulation/socioemotional skills, difficulties known to occur in a substantial percentage of struggling readers and to negatively influence academic performance. This project represents translational research that directly informs the practice community (schools, clinicians, teachers, parents), by identifying novel instructional practices that can be aggregated to more effectively influence student outcomes and reduce disparities in academic and socioemotional domains.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

While considerable knowledge has been accumulated on improving reading for students with reading disabilities in the primary grades, reading interventions conducted with middle-grades (i.e., grades 3-6) have been rare and have typically evidenced low impacts, even when more intensive interventions are provided for increasingly longer durations. One hindrance to extant interventions has been the narrow focus on reading problems without addressing non-academic (e.g., self-regulation, socioemotional) factors known to also affect learning. Thus, investigations of the efficacy derived from integrating additional components into standard reading skills interventions are necessary. Anxiety represents a particularly salient target for such an approach, as it is among the most commonly reported mental health issues of childhood, and significant associations have been found between anxiety and academic outcomes. Further, an overwhelming number of children who are struggling to read or who fail to respond to reading interventions report elevated anxiety. The purpose of this proposal is to evaluate an integrated program designed for middle-grade readers and comprised of evidence-based practices for the treatment of anxiety and reading difficulties. A pilot study of this program, conducted with 36 students randomized to treatment and control conditions, demonstrated its feasibility and positive effects on anxiety outcomes. The RCT will extend this work by comparing the combined reading and anxiety intervention with a reading-only condition and a control condition. Struggling readers will be included in this study and will receive two years of intervention. The study will assess efficacy of the interventions at reducing anxiety and improving reading at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up (Aim 1). This project significantly enhances extant research on interventions for struggling reading by examining mechanisms of action associated with augmented outcomes among students who receive the combined intervention (Aim 2), and by determining potential moderators of intervention effects (Aim 3). In all, between 300 and 350 ethnically diverse students will be recruited. A multi-informant (student, parent, teacher), multi-method (e.g., survey, standardized test, experiential sampling) assessment will be used. Relevance of this project lies in the determination of whether the inclusion of anxiety management skills enhances existing intervention outcomes for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades (concurrently/longitudinally). Examination of contextual and mitigating factors are further relevant for understanding the complex etiology of response to intervention among struggling readers. This project represents translational research that directly informs the practice community (e.g., clinicians, teachers) by identifying novel instructional practices that can be aggregated to more effectively influence student outcomes. By providing socioemotional skills training with a reading intervention using a school-based delivery model, this work has the potential of reducing disparities in mental health outcomes by reaching students of diverse backgrounds (e.g., ethnicity, SES) who would be otherwise less likely to receive such services.

NOTE: The Covid-19 pandemic emerged mid-project and altered several of our plans for this project, as well as led to a mid-project extension. Specifically, this was designed as a 2-cohort, multi-year intervention study. While Cohort 1 completed all planned milestones and activities, for Cohort 2 the intervention was ongoing when the pandemic closed all schools. A third Cohort was then added when schools reopened, but students in Cohort 3 only received 1 year of the intended 2-year intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Reading Disability Anxiety

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
participants and evaluators are not told which interventions individual participants have been assigned to

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Reading Plus Attention Control

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Reading

Intervention Type OTHER

Small group reading instruction

Attention Control (math practice)

Intervention Type OTHER

Attention Control (math practice)

Reading Plus Anxiety

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Reading

Intervention Type OTHER

Small group reading instruction

Anxiety Management

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

small group anxiety management skills instruction

BAU

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Classroom Business as Usual

Intervention Type OTHER

Classroom Business as Usual

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Reading

Small group reading instruction

Intervention Type OTHER

Anxiety Management

small group anxiety management skills instruction

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Classroom Business as Usual

Classroom Business as Usual

Intervention Type OTHER

Attention Control (math practice)

Attention Control (math practice)

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Students enrolled in the 3rd or 4th grade
* Demonstrate difficulty with reading (which is defined as scoring at or below a standard score of 90 on the Gates MacGinite Reading Comprehension Test
* Difficulty with reading must be confirmed by classroom teacher/school

Exclusion Criteria

* Students with limited English proficient (due to all assessments being administered in English only)
* Students in life skills classes (due to task appropriateness)
* Students who have an unrelated neurological disorder (e.g., tumor, traumatic brain injury)
* Students who have a severe psychiatric disorder that prevents assessment (e.g., autism), or who have an uncorrected sensory disorder
Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

14 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Texas at Austin

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Boston University Charles River Campus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Amie E. Grills

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amie E Grills, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Boston University

Sharon Vaughn, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Texas at Austin

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Texas at Austin

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RHD087706A

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Efficacy of Let's Know! First Grade
NCT06945289 COMPLETED NA