Treating Phantom Limb Pain Using Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Department of Defense Funded Multicenter Study
NCT ID: NCT01824082
Last Updated: 2024-05-08
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
144 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-12-01
2020-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The exact reason that phantom limb pain occurs is unclear, but when a nerve is cut-as happens with a traumatic amputation-changes occur in the brain and spinal cord that actually worsen with increasing phantom pain. These abnormal changes may often be corrected by putting local anesthetic-termed a "peripheral nerve block"-on the injured nerve, keeping any "bad signals" from reaching the brain, with resolution of the phantom limb pain. However, when the nerve block ends after a few hours, the phantom pain returns. But, this demonstrates that the brain abnormalities-and phantom pain-that occur with an amputation may be dependent upon the "bad" signals being sent from the injured nerve(s), suggesting that a very long peripheral nerve block-lasting many days rather than hours-may permanently reverse the abnormal changes in the brain, and provide lasting relief from phantom pain.
Until recently, extending a peripheral nerve block beyond 16 hours was unrealistic. However, a treatment option called a "continuous peripheral nerve block" is now available. This technique involves the placement of a tiny tube-smaller than a piece of spaghetti-through the skin and next to the nerves supplying the amputated limb. The tiny tube may be placed with minimal discomfort in about 15 minutes. Numbing medicine called local anesthetic is then infused through the tube, blocking any signals that the injured nerve sends to the spinal cord and brain. Using a small, portable infusion pump, this prolonged nerve block may be provided in individuals' own homes.
The ultimate objective of the proposed research study is to determine if a 6-day continuous peripheral nerve block provided at home is an effective treatment for persistent phantom limb pain following a traumatic limb amputation. The primary hypothesis (what the researchers predict) is that phantom limb pain intensity will be significantly decreased 4 weeks following treatment with a 6-day continuous peripheral nerve block.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Improving Postamputation Functioning by Decreasing Phantom Pain With Perioperative Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Department of Defense Funded Multicenter Study
NCT03461120
Ambulatory Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Treatment of Post-Amputation Phantom Limb and Stump Pain
NCT00667264
Naval Medical Center San Diego (NMCSD) - Ambulatory Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Treatment of Post-Amputation Phantom Limb and Stump Pain
NCT00768248
Prevention of Phantom Limb and Stump Pain Using Ambulatory Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Pilot Study
NCT00771862
Cryoanalgesia to Treat Phantom Limb Pain Following Above-Knee Amputation
NCT06071715
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective. To determine if ambulatory CPNB is an effective treatment for intractable phantom limb pain following a traumatic limb amputation. Previously-published small, uncontrolled series describe patients immediately following surgical amputation whose phantom limb pain dramatically decreased or completely resolved with CPNB. We have data from a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, crossover pilot study suggesting great promise treating intractable phantom limb pain with ambulatory CPNB: participants (n=3) experienced no change in their phantom pain following a 6-day infusion of normal saline; however, with a 6-day CPNB of potent local anesthetic administered 4 months later, subjects (n=2; one patient returned to duty before crossover infusion) experienced complete resolution of their phantom limb pain. Within the 12-week follow-up period, one subject experienced no phantom pain recurrence; and the other subject reported mild pain occurring once each week of just a small fraction of his original pain.
Specific Aims. The primary hypothesis is that phantom limb pain intensity will be significantly decreased 4 weeks following an ambulatory CPNB (as measured by the Numeric Rating Scale of the Brief Pain Inventory).
Study Design. We propose a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, simultaneous parallel and crossover, human-subjects clinical trial. We will include subjects with an existing upper or lower amputation who experience phantom limb pain at least daily for the previous 4 weeks. Catheter site(s) will be determined by amputation location. Subjects will be randomized to receive one of two study solutions in a double-masked manner: either a local anesthetic (ropivacaine 0.5%) or placebo (normal saline). Catheters will be removed after 6 days of at-home infusion. Although not required, each subject has the option to return for the alternative treatment four weeks later (crossover infusion). The primary endpoint will be the difference in average phantom pain intensity at baseline and 4 weeks following the initial infusion as measured with the Numeric Rating Scale between treatment groups for the initial infusion. Major secondary endpoints will involve intra- and inter-subject comparisons of additional measures of pain and health-related quality-of-life.
Clinical Impact. From 2001-2006, over 70% of all U.S. military casualties endured a major limb injury, with an amputation rate of 28% within Operation Enduring Freedom alone. Previous conflicts have left tens-of-thousands of United States Armed Forces Veterans with missing limbs. CPNB are now relatively ubiquitous within the United States, but applied nearly exclusively to provide acute post-injury/surgical analgesia. If the proposed study demonstrates that ambulatory CPNB is a reliable treatment for intractable phantom limb pain, the resulting impact in treating the consequences of traumatic amputation will be immediate and profound, as healthcare providers within the United States Armed Forces and Veterans Affairs Medical Centers already have expertise placing and managing perineural catheters. Currently, CPNB is provided exclusively in the acute setting-to treat pain immediately following a battlefield injury or surgery-and not chronic, intractable phantom limb pain. However, because there is little technical difference in providing CPNB for acute versus chronic pain, the thousands of U.S. Veterans and active duty personnel suffering from intractable phantom pain could be treated relatively easily, rapidly, and with negligible additional costs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ropivacaine 0.5%
Electronic, programmable, portable infusion pumps will be used to administer perineural study solution at fixed rates for over 6 days. Subjects will receive a total of 1,100 mL of study fluid from either one (upper extremity) or two (lower extremity) pump and external reservoir combinations. The continuous basal infusion rate will be determined by catheter location: femoral 2.5 mL/h; popliteal-sciatic 5 mL/h; and infraclavicular 7.5 mL/h (37.5 mg/h for both upper and lower extremity subjects). No patient-controlled bolus dose will be included. Subjects assigned this treatment for their initial infusion will have the option of returning 4-16 weeks later for a second infusion of the alternate treatment: normal saline.
Perineural infusion [continuous peripheral nerve block(s)]
Electronic, programmable, portable infusion pumps will be used to administer perineural study solution at fixed rates for over 6 days. Subjects will receive a total of 1,100 mL of study fluid from either one (upper extremity) or two (lower extremity) pump and external reservoir combinations. The continuous basal infusion rate will be determined by catheter location: femoral 2.5 mL/h; popliteal-sciatic 5 mL/h; and infraclavicular 7.5 mL/h (37.5 mg/h for both upper and lower extremity subjects). No patient-controlled bolus dose will be included. Subjects will have the option of returning 4-16 weeks later for a second infusion of the alternate treatment solution.
Normal saline (salt water) infusion
Electronic, programmable, portable infusion pumps will be used to administer perineural study solution at fixed rates for over 6 days. Subjects will receive a total of 1,100 mL of normal saline placebo fluid from either one (upper extremity) or two (lower extremity) pump and external reservoir combinations. The continuous basal infusion rate will be determined by catheter location: femoral 2.5 mL/h; popliteal-sciatic 5 mL/h; and infraclavicular 7.5 mL/h (37.5 mg/h for both upper and lower extremity subjects). No patient-controlled bolus dose will be included. Subjects assigned this treatment for their initial infusion will have the option of returning 4-16 weeks later for a second infusion of the alternate treatment: ropivacaine 0.5%.
Perineural infusion [continuous peripheral nerve block(s)]
Electronic, programmable, portable infusion pumps will be used to administer perineural study solution at fixed rates for over 6 days. Subjects will receive a total of 1,100 mL of study fluid from either one (upper extremity) or two (lower extremity) pump and external reservoir combinations. The continuous basal infusion rate will be determined by catheter location: femoral 2.5 mL/h; popliteal-sciatic 5 mL/h; and infraclavicular 7.5 mL/h (37.5 mg/h for both upper and lower extremity subjects). No patient-controlled bolus dose will be included. Subjects will have the option of returning 4-16 weeks later for a second infusion of the alternate treatment solution.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Perineural infusion [continuous peripheral nerve block(s)]
Electronic, programmable, portable infusion pumps will be used to administer perineural study solution at fixed rates for over 6 days. Subjects will receive a total of 1,100 mL of study fluid from either one (upper extremity) or two (lower extremity) pump and external reservoir combinations. The continuous basal infusion rate will be determined by catheter location: femoral 2.5 mL/h; popliteal-sciatic 5 mL/h; and infraclavicular 7.5 mL/h (37.5 mg/h for both upper and lower extremity subjects). No patient-controlled bolus dose will be included. Subjects will have the option of returning 4-16 weeks later for a second infusion of the alternate treatment solution.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Upper or lower limb traumatic or surgical amputation at least 12 weeks prior to enrollment at or distal to the mid-humerus or hip (femoral head remaining), respectively; and including at least one metacarpal or metatarsal bone, respectively.
* Experiencing at least moderate phantom limb pain (defined as 2 or higher on the numeric rating scale, NRS 0-10), at least three times each week for the previous 8 weeks.
* Accepting of an ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve block for 6 days.
* Willing to avoid changes to their analgesic regimen from 4 weeks prior to and at least 4 weeks following the initial catheter placement (preferably 4 weeks following the second/crossover catheter insertion as well).
* Having a "caretaker" who will transport the subject home following the catheter insertion(s), and remain with the subject for the first night of the infusions.
Exclusion Criteria
* Allergy to study medications
* Pregnancy
* Incarceration
* Inability to communicate with the investigators
* Morbid obesity (BMI greater than 40)
* Comorbidity that results in moderate-to-severe functional limitation (ASA greater than 2)
* Possessing any contraindication to ambulatory perineural catheter placement or perineural local anesthetic infusion:
* Current infection
* Immune-compromised status of any etiology
* Uncontrolled anxiety/panic disorder
* Inability to contact investigators during the perineural infusion
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
United States Department of Defense
FED
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Brian M. Ilfeld, MD, MS
Professor of Anesthesiology, In Residence
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Brian M Ilfeld, MD, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Diego
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Veteran's Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System
Palo Alto, California, United States
University of California, San Diego, Hillcrest Medical Center
San Diego, California, United States
Walter Reed Army National Medical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ilfeld BM, Khatibi B, Maheshwari K, Madison S, Ali Sakr Esa W, Mariano ER, Kent M, Hanling S, Sessler DI, Eisenach JC, Cohen SP, Mascha E, Li S, Turan A; PAINfRE Investigators. Patient-centered results from a multicenter study of continuous peripheral nerve blocks and postamputation phantom and residual limb pain: secondary outcomes from a randomized, clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Sep;48(9):471-477. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104389. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
Ilfeld BM, Khatibi B, Maheshwari K, Madison SJ, Ali Sakr Esa W, Mariano ER, Kent ML, Hanling S, Sessler DI, Eisenach JC, Cohen SP, Mascha EJ, Yang D, Padwal JA, Turan A; PAINfRE Investigators. Immediate Effects of a Continuous Peripheral Nerve Block on Postamputation Phantom and Residual Limb Pain: Secondary Outcomes From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 2021 Oct 1;133(4):1019-1027. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005673.
Ilfeld BM, Khatibi B, Maheshwari K, Madison SJ, Esa WAS, Mariano ER, Kent ML, Hanling S, Sessler DI, Eisenach JC, Cohen SP, Mascha EJ, Ma C, Padwal JA, Turan A; PAINfRE Investigators. Ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve blocks to treat postamputation phantom limb pain: a multicenter, randomized, quadruple-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Pain. 2021 Mar 1;162(3):938-955. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002087.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Phantom Pain Treatment (DoD)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.