A Trial of Lidocaine Patch for Lower Limb Amputation Pain
NCT ID: NCT02696720
Last Updated: 2018-01-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE2
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-05-13
2017-06-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The lidocaine patch 5% is a topical analgesic acting by blocking sodium channels of peripheral nerve endings and by inhibiting ectopic discharges in sensitized and hyperactive cutaneous nociceptors. The patch is noninvasive, with minimal systemic absorption resulting in a reduced risk of drug-drug interaction. In addition, a central analgesic effect of lidocaine has been suggested. The lidocaine patch 5% is currently licensed for the treatment of symptomatic postherpetic neuralgia. It also has been successfully used in patients with other neuropathic pain states, such as entrapment neuropathies, painful idiopathic distal sensory polyneuropathies and postoperative/post traumatic neuropathic chronic cutaneous pain. The lidocaine patch has not been studied for the management and prevention of phantom limb pain.
The aim of the present research is to investigate if a lidocaine patch 5% is effective for reducing PLP and primary/secondary scar hyperalgesia. The hypothesis is that persistent peripheral nociceptive input from the stump after surgery may drive maladaptive cortical reorganization leading to chronic central pain and thus promote chronic phantom limb pain. Treating scar hyperalgesia on the stump with topical lidocaine may reduce the activity of peripheral nociceptive afferents and thus decrease the likelihood of developing persistent phantom limb pain.
This study is designed as a randomized controlled multicentric double blind trial, in which the effectiveness of applying a 5% lidocaine patch for 6 weeks will be compared with a sham.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Postamputation Pain: Peripheral Mechanisms
NCT03317600
The Pain in Amputees Reduced by Administration of Diet Examination
NCT05460845
Impact of 5% Lidocaine Medicated Plaster on Allodynic Symptoms of Localized Neuropathic Pain After Knee Surgery
NCT02763592
Prevention of Phantom Limb and Stump Pain Using Ambulatory Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Pilot Study
NCT00771862
Prevention of Phantom Limb Pain After Transtibial Amputation
NCT01626755
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lidocaine
During a period of six weeks, a lidocaine patch will be applied around the wound (cut in two parts, 1cm above and below the wound, without direct contact with the scar) for a total of twelve hours per day, during night time.
Lidocaine
Sham
During a period of six weeks, a visually identical patch (sham) will be applied around the wound (cut in two parts, 1cm above and below the wound, without direct contact with the scar) for a total of twelve hours per day, during night time.
Sham
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lidocaine
Sham
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* History of major psychiatric disease (MMS\<23/30, HADS\>8/21)
* Pregnancy
* Known hypersensitivity to local anesthetics (lidocaine, bupivacaine, etidocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine)
* skin irritation on the stump
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Brugmann University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Samar Hatem
Head of clinic
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Samar Hatem, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU Brugmann
Simone Brienza, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU Brugmann
Valérie Gangji, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Erasme
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Brugmann - Queen Astrid
Brussels, , Belgium
Erasme -CTR
Brussels, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Robinson LR, Czerniecki JM, Ehde DM, Edwards WT, Judish DA, Goldberg ML, Campbell KM, Smith DG, Jensen MP. Trial of amitriptyline for relief of pain in amputees: results of a randomized controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Jan;85(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00476-3.
HARDY JD, WOLFF HG, GOODELL H. Experimental evidence on the nature of cutaneous hyperalgesia. J Clin Invest. 1950 Jan;29(1):115-40. doi: 10.1172/JCI102227. No abstract available.
Gammaitoni AR, Alvarez NA, Galer BS. Safety and tolerability of the lidocaine patch 5%, a targeted peripheral analgesic: a review of the literature. J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Feb;43(2):111-7. doi: 10.1177/0091270002239817.
Koppert W, Ostermeier N, Sittl R, Weidner C, Schmelz M. Low-dose lidocaine reduces secondary hyperalgesia by a central mode of action. Pain. 2000 Mar;85(1-2):217-24. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00268-7.
Nalamachu S, Crockett RS, Gammaitoni AR, Gould EM. A comparison of the lidocaine patch 5% vs naproxen 500 mg twice daily for the relief of pain associated with carpal tunnel syndrome: a 6-week, randomized, parallel-group study. MedGenMed. 2006 Aug 9;8(3):33.
Herrmann DN, Barbano RL, Hart-Gouleau S, Pennella-Vaughan J, Dworkin RH. An open-label study of the lidocaine patch 5% in painful idiopathic sensory polyneuropathy. Pain Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;6(5):379-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.00058.x.
Hans G, Joukes E, Verhulst J, Vercauteren M. Management of neuropathic pain after surgical and non-surgical trauma with lidocaine 5% patches: study of 40 consecutive cases. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Nov;25(11):2737-43. doi: 10.1185/03007990903282297.
Bouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, Boureau F, Brochet B, Bruxelle J, Cunin G, Fermanian J, Ginies P, Grun-Overdyking A, Jafari-Schluep H, Lanteri-Minet M, Laurent B, Mick G, Serrie A, Valade D, Vicaut E. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain. 2005 Mar;114(1-2):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.010. Epub 2005 Jan 26.
Bouhassira D, Attal N, Fermanian J, Alchaar H, Gautron M, Masquelier E, Rostaing S, Lanteri-Minet M, Collin E, Grisart J, Boureau F. Development and validation of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory. Pain. 2004 Apr;108(3):248-257. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.024.
Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain. 1987 Aug;30(2):191-197. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8.
Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CHUB-patch lidocaine
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.