Outpatient Induction Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT01807091
Last Updated: 2021-03-05
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
17 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-05-21
2020-01-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Early Discharge and Outpatient Care After Chemotherapy in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT00844441
Feasibility and Outcomes of Allogeneic HCT Compared to Chemotherapy in Older AML Patients
NCT01929408
Early Discharge and Outpatients Care in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Acute Myeloid Leukemia Previously Treated With Intensive Chemotherapy
NCT01235572
Decitabine With or Without Bortezomib in Treating Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT01420926
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Valspodar in Treating Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT00003190
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Assess the feasibility of outpatient induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) by examining whether:
1. \> 50% of patients treated as outpatients can complete chemotherapy without being admitted to hospital.
2. \< 5% of patients die within 14 days of beginning outpatient chemotherapy.
OUTLINE:
Patients receive outpatient induction chemotherapy.
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The study was monitored to assure that there was not an excess probability of admission to the hospital during receipt of outpatient chemotherapy or death within 14 days of initiating chemotherapy as assessed by Bayesian posterior probabilities using the "predictive probabilities" tool (MD Anderson Cancer Center Department of Statistics).
Stopping earlier would happen under 2 circumstances:
1. Excess probability that patients required admission to hospital during the 4-7 days of outpatient chemotherapy (predictive probability be \< 0.10, or 7 patients admitted and 3 not admitted among 10 patients enrolled versus the maximum acceptable rate of 4 patients admitted and 6 not admitted among 10 patients enrolled).
2. Excess probability that patients die during the 14 days after beginning outpatient treatment (predictive probability be \>0.90, for example in cases where there are 2 patient deaths within 14 days and less than 5 patients without deaths within 14 days, or in any case where there are 3 patient deaths within 14 days).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment (chemotherapy)
Participants received intensive initial or salvage induction chemotherapy regimens. These regimens would usually be administered in the inpatient setting, however participants received them outpatient. This study did not dictate the choice of induction chemotherapy regimen. The regimen was decided upon by patient and their treating oncologist and clinical care team. The induction chemotherapy regimens administrations spanned 4-7 days.
Chemotherapy
Receive outpatient induction chemotherapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Chemotherapy
Receive outpatient induction chemotherapy
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The signed informed consent
* The benefits/risks of the induction chemotherapy regimen will be reviewed, and a second consent may be necessary if the regimen will be administered according to a separate protocol
* AML (acute promyelocytic leukemia \[APL\] excepted) or high-risk MDS (10-19% blasts in marrow by morphology or flow cytometry or blood)
* Treatment-related mortality (TRM) score \< 9.21 corresponding to a TRM rate of 3% when chemotherapy of similar intensity as proposed here is administered to inpatients
* Blast count =\< 10,000
* Fibrinogen \> 200
* Afebrile with clear chest imaging and no signs of active viral, bacterial, fungal infection unless determined to be, at the discretion of the investigator, not clinically significant in the context of this study
* Adequate cardiac function as demonstrated by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 45% or greater, by multiple gated acquisition (MUGA) or echocardiogram; no ongoing cardiac issues such as uncontrolled arrhythmias or unstable angina or congestive heart failure
* Patient must have an outpatient caregiver available
* Patient must live within 30 minutes of the treating physician's office during outpatient treatment
* Patient must be willing to return to the treating physician's office for outpatient follow-up once outpatient treatment is completed
* Logistical requirements:
* Space available in infusion room
* Outpatient infusion pump available if continuous infusion required
* Case discussed with infusion room nursing staff
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
University of Washington
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Elihu H. Estey
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pamela Becker
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Eli Estey
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bozeman Deaconess Hospital
Bozeman, Montana, United States
Kadlec Clinic Hematology and Oncology
Kennewick, Washington, United States
EvergreenHealth Medical Center
Kirkland, Washington, United States
Skagit Valley Hospital
Mount Vernon, Washington, United States
Olympic Medical Center
Port Angeles, Washington, United States
Group Health Cooperative
Redmond, Washington, United States
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Seattle, Washington, United States
Multicare Health System
Tacoma, Washington, United States
Wenatchee Valley Hospital and Clinics
Wenatchee, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2013-00483
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
7910
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
RG1000945
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
7910
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.