One Year Outcome Using the Ajust System for Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence

NCT ID: NCT01754558

Last Updated: 2014-05-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-05-31

Study Completion Date

2014-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

During the last decade numerous new procedures have been presented regarding surgical treatment of urinary stress incontinence (1,2). Development of the midurethral tape procedure (TVT) changed the surgical procedure dramatically both regarding the extent of the surgical procedure and also decreased the morbidity remarkably. The success rate of the TVT procedure has been proven to be high (1,2 ). However, the development of the TOT/TVT-O procedures disclosed a new fixation point and further decreased the risk of bladder injury (1,2). Since the introduction of trans-obturator slings several mini-slings have been introduced in order to reduce the need of perforation of the skin and muscles (3,4,5). Although some systems seem promising (5) others have disclosed a long learning curve, pain problems following the procedure and lower success rates, compared to the traditional sling procedures. None of these mini-slings have been adjustable.

Recently the Ajust system for treatment of stress urinary incontinence was introduced. The system is a single incision sling procedure and consists of an adjustable Polypropylene mesh sling with self fixation anchors (6). In a feasibility study (6), the 6 months objective cure rate was 82%, but there is a lack of information regarding adverse events and durability of treatment success. Our preliminary experiences suggest, that the procedure has a rapid learning curve, low pain scores postoperatively and a 94% cure rate at 3 months follow-up (personal observation). Recently, several abstracts have indicated that the cure rate obtained by Ajust is comparable to TVT or TVT-O (10-12).

The purpose of the present study is (primary outcome):

To test the hypothesis that the Ajust and TVT, TVT-O and TOT, respectively are equal regarding subjective cure rate (cure is defined as subjectively not incontinent at all), i.e. the study is designed as a non-inferiority study. The study is performed as a randomised controlled trial without blinding. The study is powered to detect a 9% difference between the two groups. The subjective cure rate is based on ICIQ measurement

Secondary outcome:

* To test the hypothesis that Ajust is associated with a significantly lower postoperative pain perception.
* To test the hypothesis that antibiotic treatment is not necessary

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary endpoint: A cured patients is defined as no subjective symptoms (ICIQ-UI SF and ICIQ-OAB) and no objective detectable urinary leakage during coughing (300cc in the bladder and no leakage during coughing)

Secondary outcome: Pain-perception is evaluated by VAS scoring daily during the first postoperative week, including assessing the need for painkilling medication

The endpoint regarding the use of antibiotics is based on the number of urinary tract infections and infections related to the vaginal closure during the first postoperative months. All patients will evaluated postoperative by physical examination and by urinary dipstick

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Stress Incontinence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ajust sling

The sling a a new device for stress urinary incontinence. The sling is ajustable and is not penetrating the skin, i.e. is only attached to the obturator membrane

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ajust system

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The use of Ajust system for stress incontinence

TVT/TVT-O

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

sling surgery

TVT/TVT-O, polypropylne slings

TVT/TVT-O system. These two systems is wellknown and used for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. The sling penetrate the skin in order to secure adjustment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ajust system

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The use of Ajust system for stress incontinence

TVT/TVT-O

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

sling surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ajust system

The use of Ajust system for stress incontinence

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TVT/TVT-O

sling surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- 1. A medical history of stress urinary incontinence, i.e. leakage during coughing, sneezing or leakage during physical exertion. OR 2. A medical history of mixed urinary stress incontinence defined as complaint of involuntary leakage associated with urgency and stress incontinence. Stress incontinence has to the dominating symptom defined as more episodes of leakage due to coughing or physical exertion than with urgency.

3\. A provocative stress test up to ten coughs at a standardized bladder volume (300 ml) confirming urinary leakage from the urethra while the patient is asked to cough or perform a Valsalva manoeuvre standing or lying (7). Furthermore, the patient has to present hypermobility of the urethra/bladder neck defined as significant downward rotation when coughing or during Valsalva.?

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous anti-incontinence surgery.
2. Residual urine volume \>100 ml
3. Bladder capacity \<200ml according to diary.
4. Planned or current pregnancy
5. Repeated urinary tract infections (\>4 cystitis last year )
6. Current anticoagulation therapy that can´t be interrupted in due time prior to surgery
7. Known abnormal coagulation
8. Allergy to local anaesthetics
9. Co-existing pelvic pathology, such as ovarian mass etc
10. Vaginal POPQ anterior prolapse grade \>=2
11. A medical history of predominantly urge urinary incontinence.
12. Patients unable to understand the protocol and a follow up
13. Patients younger than 18 and above or equal to 60 years.
14. Known or suspected neurological condition
15. Patients who have not paused acethylsalicylic acid (ASA) medication 7 days prior to surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zealand University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Martin Rudnicki

Ass. Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Martin Rudnicki

Roskilde, Roskilde, Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Temtanakitpaisan T, Buppasiri P, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Rattanakanokchai S. Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing infection after continence surgery in women with stress urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD012457. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012457.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35349162 (View on PubMed)

Rudnicki M, von Bothmer-Ostling K, Holstad A, Magnusson C, Majida M, Merkel C, Prien J, Jakobsson U, Teleman P. Adjustable mini-sling compared with conventional mid-urethral slings in women with urinary incontinence. A randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Nov;96(11):1347-1356. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13205. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28815547 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SJ-252

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Efficacy/Safety of Midurethral Sling
NCT05255289 RECRUITING NA
Mid-Urethral Sling Tensioning Trial
NCT02480231 COMPLETED NA