A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Types of Memory Training Programs in People With a Diagnosis of Mental Illness.

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

76 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-10-31

Study Completion Date

2015-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare the effectiveness of a psychoeducational memory program versus a computerized memory program in individuals with mental illness. Although improvements are expected with both form of interventions, we do not know which will provide maximal benefit in this population.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Measuring the Impact of Cognitive and Psychosocial Interventions in Persons With Mild Cognitive Impairment

NCT01448148

Mild Cognitive Impairment

COMPLETED NA

Making Memory Better for Seniors With Mild Cognitive Impairment

NCT01532739

Mild Cognitive Impairment

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA

Cognitive Training and Practice Effects in Mild Cognitive Impairment

NCT02301546

Mild Cognitive Impairment

COMPLETED NA

Mental Training for Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment

NCT03895346

Mild Cognitive Impairment Aging

COMPLETED NA

Effects of Cognitive Intervention for Older Adults With Memory Decline: A Pilot Study

NCT00609427

Mild Cognitive Impairment

COMPLETED PHASE1

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of the current study is to compare two memory strategies, a top-down (i.e., educational and interventional)protocol vs. a bottom-up (computerized)protocol, in a population of individuals diagnosed with mental illness. Performance on ecologically validated memory tasks will be measured before and after each intervention protocol. Improvements are expected following each protocol. However, there is no evidence available to support added benefits from one protocol over another. As such, the current study will endeavour to contrast the two intervention types (top-down vs. bottom-up) to determine which, if any, provides maximal benefit.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Memory Impairment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Memory Intervention

Two types of memory protocols (psychoeducational vs computerized) will be compared in a population of individuals with mental illness.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Memory Intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

A comparison of two type of memory intervention protocols; a psychoeducational/intervention protocol versus a computerized memory protocol in a population of individuals with mental illness.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Memory Intervention

A comparison of two type of memory intervention protocols; a psychoeducational/intervention protocol versus a computerized memory protocol in a population of individuals with mental illness.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Memory impairment equivalent to 1.5 std. dev. below average for age
* Speak and read English fluently

Exclusion Criteria

* Older than 65 years of age
* Significant visual impairment (e.g., cataracts, macular degeneration)
* Motor impairment (e.g., hemiplegia on dominant side)
* Diagnosis of Dementia
* Alcohol and/or substance abuse (in past 3 months)

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No