I.D.E.A.L.-I.C.U. (Initiation of Dialysis EArly Versus deLayed in Intensive Care Unit)
NCT ID: NCT01682590
Last Updated: 2018-11-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
500 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Dialysis Strategies in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Renal Failure
NCT00322530
Clinical Trial Comparing Continuous Versus Intermittent Hemodialysis in ICU Patients
NCT01228123
Effect of Intradialytic Parenteral Nutrition on Morbidity and Mortality of Malnourished Hemodialysis Patients
NCT00314834
RandomizEd ClinicAL triaL on the Efficacy and saFety of Incremental Hemodialysis (REAL-LIFE)
NCT04360694
Dialysis Weaning in Intensive Care Units (Dialysis STOP)
NCT03763188
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Secondary objectives include: to compare the impact of the two RRT strategies on 28, 180 et 360 day mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of RRT, duration of ICU stay and duration of overall hospital stay. In addition, quality of life at 90 and 360 days will be evaluated using the EQ5D questionnaire. Tolerance of both strategies will be compared in terms of metabolic disorders, arrhythmias, pulmonary oedema by overload, hypotension, hemorrhagic complications, and dependence on RRT at hospital discharge.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Early initiation of RRT
Start of RRT within a maximum of 12 hours after randomisation.
Renal Remplacement Therapy
Investigators of each center will have the choice of the RRT technique based on their usual practice: intermittent hemodialysis, intermittent hemodiafiltration, continuous hemodialysis, continuous hemofiltration, continuous hemodiafiltration (typically the continuous techniques in the acute phase, followed by intermittent techniques after stabilization).
In case of life threatening conditions within the 48 hours after randomisation (hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis or pulmonary edema) the RRT will be initiated as soon as possible.
In case of improvement of renal function within the 48 hours after randomisation (defined as the return of spontaneous urine output \> 1000ml/24 hr or \>2000ml/24hr with diuretics), RRT is not mandatory.
Deferred RRT
Start of RRT between 48 and 60 hours after randomisation.
Renal Remplacement Therapy
Investigators of each center will have the choice of the RRT technique based on their usual practice: intermittent hemodialysis, intermittent hemodiafiltration, continuous hemodialysis, continuous hemofiltration, continuous hemodiafiltration (typically the continuous techniques in the acute phase, followed by intermittent techniques after stabilization).
In case of life threatening conditions within the 48 hours after randomisation (hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis or pulmonary edema) the RRT will be initiated as soon as possible.
In case of improvement of renal function within the 48 hours after randomisation (defined as the return of spontaneous urine output \> 1000ml/24 hr or \>2000ml/24hr with diuretics), RRT is not mandatory.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Renal Remplacement Therapy
Investigators of each center will have the choice of the RRT technique based on their usual practice: intermittent hemodialysis, intermittent hemodiafiltration, continuous hemodialysis, continuous hemofiltration, continuous hemodiafiltration (typically the continuous techniques in the acute phase, followed by intermittent techniques after stabilization).
In case of life threatening conditions within the 48 hours after randomisation (hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis or pulmonary edema) the RRT will be initiated as soon as possible.
In case of improvement of renal function within the 48 hours after randomisation (defined as the return of spontaneous urine output \> 1000ml/24 hr or \>2000ml/24hr with diuretics), RRT is not mandatory.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Septic shock is defined as severe sepsis with at least 2 to 4 "SIRS" criteria and persistent hypotension despite adequate vascular filling and need vaso-active drugs.
SIRS is defined as the simultaneous presence of at least 2 of the following criteria :
* Body temperature ≥ 38°C ou ≤ 36°C
* Heart rate ≥ 90 bpm
* Respiratory rate ≥ 20/mn or PaCO2 ≤ 32 mmHg
* Leucocytes ≥ 12,000/mm3 or ≤ 4,000/mm3 or \>10% immature forms.
Acute renal insufficiency is defined as the "failure" stage of the RIFLE classification, i.e. the presence of at least one of the following criteria:
* Increased creatinine x 3 times the baseline value
* Oliguria \< 0.3 ml/kg/h for 12 hours
* Anuria (diuresis \< 100ml) for at least 12 hours
All patients are required to provide informed consent after having been appropriately informed about the study. In case of temporary incapacity of the patient to sign, the consent form can be signed by a surrogate.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patients with chronic renal at dialysis.
2. Patients presenting acute renal failure of type obstructive and patients already presenting emergency criteria for immediate hemodialysis at the time of randomization (i.e. hyperkalemia \>6.5 mmol/L or pH\<7.15 or pulmonary oedema by fluid overload)
3. Patients already had hemodialysis before their arrival in the intensive care unit
4. Pregnant women.
5. Moribund patients whose life expectancy is less than 24 hours
6. Patients unlikely to survive to 28 days because of uncontrollable comorbidities (e.g. cardiac, pulmonary or hepatic disease at the terminal stage, hepatorenal syndrome, uncontrolled cancer, severe post-anorexic encephalopathy…)
7. Patients with advance directives indicating their wish not to be resuscitated.
8. Patients under legal guardianship.
9. Patients participing in another interventional study that may influence the prognosis of patients.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jean-Pierre QUENOT
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
Saber Davide BARBAR
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU de Nimes
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CH Avignon
Avignon, , France
CH Belfort
Belfort, , France
CHU Besançon
Besançon, , France
CH de BOURG-EN-BRESSE
Bourg-en-Bresse, , France
CHU Caen
Caen, , France
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
CH Dieppe
Dieppe, , France
CHU Dijon
Dijon, , France
CH Sud Essonne - Site Etampes
Étampes, , France
Hôpital Raymond-Poincaré GARCHES (AP-HP)
Garches, , France
CHU Grenoble
Grenoble, , France
CH de LA ROCHE sur YON
La Roche-sur-Yon, , France
Groupe Hospitalier de l'institut Catholique de LILLE
Lille, , France
CHU de Lyon
Lyon, , France
CHU Montpellier
Montpellier, , France
CHU Lapeyronie
Montpellier, , France
CHG Mulhouse
Mulhouse, , France
CHU Nancy Brabois
Nancy, , France
CHU Nîmes
Nîmes, , France
CHR d'Orléans
Orléans, , France
Hôpital Cochin
Paris, , France
HOPITAL BICHAT Claude-Bernard
Paris, , France
CH Périgueux
Périgueux, , France
CHU Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, , France
CHU de Strasbourg - Nouvel hôpital civil
Strasbourg, , France
CHR Metz
Thionville, , France
CHRU Tours
Tours, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Barbar SD, Binquet C, Monchi M, Bruyere R, Quenot JP. Impact on mortality of the timing of renal replacement therapy in patients with severe acute kidney injury in septic shock: the IDEAL-ICU study (initiation of dialysis early versus delayed in the intensive care unit): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Jul 7;15:270. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-270.
Fayad AI, Buamscha DG, Ciapponi A. Timing of kidney replacement therapy initiation for acute kidney injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 23;11(11):CD010612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010612.pub3.
Barbar SD, Clere-Jehl R, Bourredjem A, Hernu R, Montini F, Bruyere R, Lebert C, Bohe J, Badie J, Eraldi JP, Rigaud JP, Levy B, Siami S, Louis G, Bouadma L, Constantin JM, Mercier E, Klouche K, du Cheyron D, Piton G, Annane D, Jaber S, van der Linden T, Blasco G, Mira JP, Schwebel C, Chimot L, Guiot P, Nay MA, Meziani F, Helms J, Roger C, Louart B, Trusson R, Dargent A, Binquet C, Quenot JP; IDEAL-ICU Trial Investigators and the CRICS TRIGGERSEP Network. Timing of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury and Sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 11;379(15):1431-1442. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803213.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Quenot IDEAL-ICU
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.