Efficacy of Sacral Nerve Modulation in Severe Refractory Constipation

NCT ID: NCT01629303

Last Updated: 2015-07-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-06-30

Study Completion Date

2015-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Subjects with refractory chronic constipation are offered two conventional therapeutic strategies: either medical treatment, either surgery (in the case of medication failure). Nevertheless, a procedure less invasive than surgery could be an alternative strategy: the sacral nerve modulation. This procedure consists in stimulating the nerves which control the contractions of the colon and so the defecation phenomenon. Several open trials have suggested that sacral nerve modulation may be effective in reducing constipation and related symptoms. The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to assess the efficacy of the sacral nerve stimulation in patients with constipation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The prevalence of constipation is 2-27% in Western countries. For patients failing medical treatment (laxatives, biofeedback), a surgical solution may be considered (subtotal colectomy). But results are variable and it puts them at risk of functional sequelae.

Sacral nerve modulation is a minimally invasive procedure compared with the standard surgical support (colectomy) and reversible, which consists in two stages. First, a 3-week temporary stimulation test allows verifying the efficacy of neuromodulation. If the test is positive, the stimulating electrode is definitely implanted. Risks related to the procedure (infection, pain) are much smaller than those associated with a conventional surgical support.

Non comparative studies conducted with 19 and 62 patients showed that 40-73% of implanted patients have an improvement of their constipation and could benefit of permanent implantation with good results in medium term.

The primary objective of the investigators study is to evaluate the short-term efficacy (percentage of responders at 2 months) of sacral nerve modulation in the treatment of severe chronic constipation.

This is a cross-over designed, double-blinded, French multicenter clinical trial, including two periods: 2 months of stimulation ON and 2 months of stimulation OFF. Between these two periods, a 15-days period of "wash-out" will be respected during which all patients will be in OFF mode (4.5 months in total). This period of 4.5 months will be extended by a follow-up period of 7 months during which all patients will be treated (stimulation ON).

If this trial showed efficiency of this procedure, patients with severe refractory constipation could benefit of a sacral nerve modulation test before considering a surgical treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Constipation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm on-off

After the definitive implantation, stimulators are placed in position OFF during 8 weeks.

Then all the stimulators are switched OFF for 15 days. Finally stimulators are switched ON for the second arm during 8 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

sacral nerve modulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After the definitive implantation, stimulators are placed in position ON (arm on-off) or OFF (arm off-on) for the first arm and in position OFF for the second arm during 8 weeks.

Then all the stimulators are switched OFF (both first and second arms) for 15 days.

Finally stimulators are maintained in position OFF for the first arm and switched ON for the second arm during 8 weeks

Arm off-on

After the definitive implantation, stimulators are placed in position ON during 8 weeks.

Then all the stimulators are switched OFF for 15 days. Finally stimulators are maintained in position OFF during 8 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

sacral nerve modulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After the definitive implantation, stimulators are placed in position ON (arm on-off) or OFF (arm off-on) for the first arm and in position OFF for the second arm during 8 weeks.

Then all the stimulators are switched OFF (both first and second arms) for 15 days.

Finally stimulators are maintained in position OFF for the first arm and switched ON for the second arm during 8 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

sacral nerve modulation

After the definitive implantation, stimulators are placed in position ON (arm on-off) or OFF (arm off-on) for the first arm and in position OFF for the second arm during 8 weeks.

Then all the stimulators are switched OFF (both first and second arms) for 15 days.

Finally stimulators are maintained in position OFF for the first arm and switched ON for the second arm during 8 weeks

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years old
* Constipation defined by at least two of the following criteria :

* Frequency of 2 stools or less per week
* Severe outlet constipation, i.e. need to use digital extraction or enemas more than 25% of time
* Sensation of incomplete evacuation more than 25% of time
* Refractory constipation since at least 1 year to medical treatment (drug treatment and/or biofeedback) conducted in the centre (failure or intolerance to laxative osmotic treatments, stimulants, and prucalopride) for which surgery is discussed
* Patients supported in the centre for at least 3 months before inclusion
* Patients having social security system
* Patients having read and signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* Constipation secondary to ano-rectal malformation, surgical sequel, colorectal or anal organic lesions, or pelvi-perineal static disorder indicated for surgical treatment
* Constipation secondary to neurological pathology and/or concomitant treatments intake (opiates, anticholinergic agents)
* Partial colectomy history
* Patients in whom implantation of stimulating electrode is impossible due to anatomical reasons (e.g. sacral agenesis)
* Pregnant female patients or with childbearing potential without adequate contraceptive barrier (oestrogen-progesterone contraceptives or intra-uterine device)
* Skin disease associated with a risk of infection - in the opinion of the investigator
* Patient with pacemaker or defibrillator
* Patient exposed to resonance magnetic imaging
* Psychiatric disease incompatible with use of the treatment - in the opinion of the investigator
* Patient misunderstanding oral and written French language
* Patient participating to another study
* Patients who don't complete the first diary without missing data (concerning items used to define the primary endpoint)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Bordeaux

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Frank ZERBIB, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Bordeaux

Genevieve CHENE, Professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University Hospital, Bordeaux

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie et oncologie digestive

Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

Site Status

Service d' Hépato-gastro-entérologie

CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France

Site Status

Service d'exploration fonctionnelle digestive -Hospices Civils de Lyon

Lyon, Lyon, France

Site Status

: Clinique de chirurgie digestive et endocrinienne. Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (IMAD

Nantes, Nantes, France

Site Status

Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie - CHU estaing

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Service de gastroentérologie - AP HP

Colombes, , France

Site Status

Service de Chirurgie générale - CHU de Grenoble

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Service de gastroentérologie - hopital nord -AP-HM

Marseille, , France

Site Status

SMAD CHU Pontchaillou -Rennes

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Service de physiologie digestive, urinaire, respiratoire et sportive - CHU de rouen

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie et explorations fonctionnelles digestives - CHU de Tours

Tours, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zerbib F, Siproudhis L, Lehur PA, Germain C, Mion F, Leroi AM, Coffin B, Le Sidaner A, Vitton V, Bouyssou-Cellier C, Chene G; CONSTIMOD study investigators. Randomized clinical trial of sacral nerve stimulation for refractory constipation. Br J Surg. 2017 Feb;104(3):205-213. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10326. Epub 2016 Oct 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27779312 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHUBX 2011/23

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Reflexology for Chronic Constipation
NCT01599156 UNKNOWN PHASE2