Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
14 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-01-31
2015-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Observe Intestinal Tract Cleaness of Senile Constipation Patients Used Gastrointestinal External Stimulation
NCT06417424
Effect of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation on Chronic Constipation
NCT05723731
The Efficacy and Safety Study of Electro-acupuncture for Severe Chronic Functional Constipation
NCT01726504
Trancutaneous Abdominal Stimulation on Bowel Function.
NCT04627168
Colon Transit Study for Chronic Constipation Assessment and Therapy by Biofeedback With and Without TENS
NCT05946967
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
IFC stimulation is an effective, cheap and low risk intervention which has demonstrated efficacy for dysphagia, urinary incontinence, overactive bladder syndromes and chronic pain. The precise mechanism of its analgesic and pro-kinetic effect is unknown. The intervention is delivered by two separate continuous alternating electrical currents. Two pairs of pad electrodes are arranged in a quadripolar manner where each pair delivers a different frequency of current. It is suggested that this arrangement of stimulation improves colonic propagation. However as direct massage of the abdomen has demonstrated benefit in constipation it is argued that IFC is not a specific requirement and that non-IFC electrical stimulation over the abdomen is sufficient to evoke the same colonic and clinical responses. Owing to these questions the efficacy of this intervention will be further evaluated in adults.
This study has two aims. The primary aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of transabdominal electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in adult patients with chronic constipation. The secondary aim is to establish whether IFC was superior to non-IFC (TENS) electrical stimulation in adults with chronic constipation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Interferential Stimulation
Medical Device: Interferential stimulation. Stimulation parameters: 4 KHz of carrier stimulation, beat frequency between 80-160Hz, amplitude upto 33mA. Delivered via two 100mm x 50mm adhesive pads placed on the anterior abdominal wall
Interferential Stimulation
Transabdominal interferential electrcial stimulation
Standard electrical stimulation
Medical Device: Standard electrical stimulation. Parameters set to provide continuous electrical stimulation at a pulse width of 210µs and a frequency of 14Hz and an amplitude upto 33mA.
TENS stimulation
Transabdominal standard electrical stimulation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Interferential Stimulation
Transabdominal interferential electrcial stimulation
TENS stimulation
Transabdominal standard electrical stimulation
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Rome III defined constipation (frequency of defecation of less than three times a week, straining or sense of incomplete emptying associated with at least 25% of defecations. Lumpy, hard stools or anal digitation for at least 25% of defecations
* Failed Biofeedback
* Competent and willing to complete stimulation at home
* Competent and willing to complete the questionnaires and bowel diaries
Exclusion Criteria
* Active inflammatory bowel disease
* Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant during trial
* Spinal cord injuries/cauda equina syndrome
* Other implanted electrical devices
* Allergy to device components
* Neurological disorders
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St Mark's Hospital Foundation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fareed Iqbal
Clinical Research Fellow/PI
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alan Warnes, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
The London Northwest Healthcare NHS Trust
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
StMarksHF
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.