Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Outcome of Conservative Triple Target Treatment With EMG-Biofeedback in Chronic Obstipation
NCT ID: NCT01672216
Last Updated: 2013-09-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
140 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-08-31
2015-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Triple Target Treatment
In the 3T arm, patients were stimulated with a carrier wave of 25 KHz and biphasic modulations of the pulse train of 40 Hz. Anxious patients trained at first only in the biofeedback mode. The stimulation was introduced after four weeks for these patients. Patients were instructed to carry out the training at home, with an alternating combination in the morning and with EMG-triggered stimulation in the evening, each for 20-minute periods. Apart from this, the protocol of the active treatment group was identical to that of the control group.
Combination of EMG-biofeedback plus EMG-triggered AM-MF-stimulation
EMG-biofeedback alone
In the biofeedback arm, patients were instructed to carry out EMG-biofeedback training at home, standing, mornings and evenings, for 20-minute periods. The core of the task was to pull the plug-electrode upward inside the anal channel, like a lift, and to hold it there during varying periods of tension. This can only be done successfully if the perineum rises and at the same time the puborectal muscle is activated. Just squeezing the sphincter muscles does not produce this lifting effect.
EMG-biofeedback alone
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Combination of EMG-biofeedback plus EMG-triggered AM-MF-stimulation
EMG-biofeedback alone
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
dr. schwandner
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
dr. schwandner
Head of Coloproctology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thilo Schwandner, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Giessen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Gießen, Dept. of General Surgery
Giessen, Hesse, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Thilo Schwandner, Dr.
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Schwandner T, Hecker A, Hirschburger M, Hecker M, Kierer W, Padberg W. Does the STARR procedure change the pelvic floor: a preoperative and postoperative study with dynamic pelvic floor MRI. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Apr;54(4):412-7. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e318205ddda.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
101/12 ethics comm. Giessen
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id